Advertisement

Single Male Rural-Urban Migrant Workers and the Negotiation of Masculinity in China

  • Xiaodong Lin
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter examines male migrant workers’ articulation and negotiation of being single. A central question is how migrant men make sense of their status of being single. The men recount heteronormative cultural values in relation to the family, which serve as central resources in forging their identities. It highlights that traditional cultural values, such as those attached to being a capable man, are lived out in single migrant men’s everyday lives. More specifically, their articulations regarding “ben shi” (capability) and “mian zi” (the face), in relation to heterosexual relationships and marriage, are central in making sense of the attributes of their masculine identities.

Keywords

Migrant Worker Single Woman Filial Piety Heterosexual Relationship Masculine Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anagnost, A. (2004). The corporeal politics of quality (Suzhi). Public Culture, 16(2), 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, M. H. (Ed.) (2010). The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, P. J. (2006). Men accessing education: Gendered aspirations. British Educational Research Journal, 32(5), 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R. W. (2014). Margin becoming centre: For a world-centred rethinking of masculinities. NORMA International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 19(4), 217–231.Google Scholar
  7. Cornwall, A., & Lindisfarne, N. (1994). Dislocating masculinity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fei, H. T. (2008). Peasant life in China. London: Hesperides Press.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, A. (2003). Research practice for cultural studies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ho, D. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingraham, C. (1996) ‘The Heterosexual Imaginary: Feminist Sociology and Theories of Gender’, in S. Seidman (ed.) Queer Theory/Sociology, pp. 168–93. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Jacka, T. (1997). Women’s work in rural China: Change and continuity in an era of reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson, S. (2006). Interchanges: Gender, sexuality and heteterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kong, T. S.-K. (2011). Chinese male homosexualities: Memba, Tongzhi and golden boy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Lawler, S. (2013). Identity: Sociological perspectives (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Lin, X. (2013). Gender, modernity and male migrant workers in China: Becoming a ‘modern’ man. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Lin, X. (2014). Filial son’, the family and identity formation among male migrant workers in urban China. Gender Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 21(6), 717–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Louie, K. (2002). Theorizing Chinese Masculinities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mac an Ghaill, M., & Haywood, C. (2007). Gender, culture and society: Contemporary femininities and masculinities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. McDowell, L. (2000). The trouble with men? Young people, gender transformations and the crisis of masculinity. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, D. (2006). The crisis in masculinity. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and women studies (pp. 109–123). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Potter, S. H., & Potter, J. M. (1990). China’s peasants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pun, N., & Chan, C. K. (2008). The subsumption of class discourse in China. Boundary 2, 35(2), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qi, X. (2011). Face: A Chinese concept in a global sociology. Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qi, X. (2014). Filial obligation in contemporary China: Evolution of the cultural-system. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. First published online: 20 Feb 2014 | doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12052.Google Scholar
  27. Reynolds, J., & Wetherall, M. (2003). The discursive climate of singleness: The consequences for women’s negotiation of a single identity. Feminism and Psychology, 13(4), 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson, S. (2000). Marked men: White masculinity in crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sigley, G. (2009). Suzhi, the body, and the fortunes of technoscientific reasoning in contemporary China. Positions, 17(3), 537–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Song, G., & Hird, D. (2013). Men and masculinities in contemporary China. Leiden: Brill Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. To, S. (2013). Understanding Sheng Nu (“Leftover Women”): The phenomenon of late marriage among Chinese professional women. Symbolic Interaction, 36(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yan, H. (2003). Neo-liberal governmentality and neo-humanism: Organizing value flow through labor recruitment agencies. Cultural Anthropology, 18(4), 493–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yan, H. (2008). New masters, new servants: Migration, development, and women workers in China. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang, J. (2010). The crisis of masculinity: Class, gender, and kindly power in post-Mao China. American Ethnologist, 37(3), 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaodong Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations