Advertisement

East Asian Men pp 237-258 | Cite as

Pathways Toward Progressive Gender Consciousness for Young Men in Taiwan

  • Herng-Dar Bih
Chapter

Abstract

Bih provides a fruitful description and analysis of the trajectory that the individual man develops a concern for gender equity in a non-Western social context. In order to reach gender equity, boys’ and men’s participations are crucial. Based on rich interviewing data, this chapter specifies that having a subjective experience of gender discrimination in society or seeing women suffering gender oppression does not necessarily lead a man to develop progressive gender consciousness. Only through the help of feminist discourse is a person able to develop an awareness of the existence of sexism and patriarchy. However, gender consciousness is an ongoing process; how they make choices to support or resist gender equity depends on the negotiation of personal, relational and political interests.

Keywords

Domestic Violence Gender Issue Gender Equity Hegemonic Masculinity Male Role 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his gratitude to the young men who participated in this research, to Chang-Ling and Shu-Yuan for their help for data collection, to Prof. Raewyn Connell and Ying-Chao Kao for their critical comments on an earlier draft, and to the National Science Council (NSC87-2413-H002-003) for financial support.

References

  1. Bergling, T. (2001). Sissyphobia: Gay men and effeminate behavior. New York: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bih, H. D. (2003). The formation of men’s gender consciousness. Research in Applied Psychology, 17, 51–84 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  3. Bih, H. D. (2004). The formation of women’s gender consciousness in Taiwan. Journal of General Education, 11(1/2), 117–146 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. Brod, H. (2013). Men’s studies: A retrospective view. Journal of Men’s Studies, 21(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christian, H. (1994). The making of anti-sexist men. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornish, P. A. (1999). Men engaging feminism: A model of personal change and social transformation. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 7(2), 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Digby, T. (1998). Introduction. In T. Digby (Ed.), Men doing feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Flood, M. (2011). Involving men in efforts to end violence against women. Men and Masculinities, 14(3), 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffin, C. (1989). “I’m not a women’s libber, but…”: Feminism, consciousness and identity. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Holmgren, L. E. (2008). Performing feminist affinity: Interviewing feminist men in Sweden. Atenea: A Bilingual Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 28(2), 107–120.Google Scholar
  13. Holmgren, L. E., & Hearn, J. (2009). Framing “men in feminism”: Theoretical locations, local contexts and practical passings in men’s gender-conscious positionings on gender equality and feminism. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, A. G. (2005). The gender knot: Unraveling our patriarchal legacy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson II, B. (2010). Toward an anti-sexist black American male identity. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11(3), 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahane, D. J. (1998). Male feminism as Oxymoron. In T. Digby (Ed.), Men doing feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Levtov, R. G., Barker, G., Contreras-Urbina, M., Heilman, B., & Verma, R. (2014). Pathways to gender equitable men: Findings from the international men and gender equality survey in eight countries. Men and Masculinities, 17(5), 467–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Messner, M. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Pease, B. (2000). Recreating men: Postmodern masculinity politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Pease, B. (2002). (Re)constructing men’s interests. Men and Masculinities, 5(2), 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schacht, S. P., & Ewing, D. (1997). The many paths of feminism: Can men travel any of them? Journal of Gender Studies, 6(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology (new ed.). New York: Routldege.Google Scholar
  24. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Femininity/masculinity. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (rev. ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Wang, H. W. (1998). Taiwanese men. Taipei: Unitas (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herng-Dar Bih
    • 1
  1. 1.National Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations