Abstract
While some countries have developed robust economies and high standards of living, along with stable and democratic political systems, others languish in poverty and are bedeviled by endemic corruption, authoritarianism, and violence. What explains this variation? The notion that there is a resource curse is perhaps the most counterintuitive and controversial hypothesis that has been tendered to address this question. Early work on the idea that oil and minerals doom countries to underdevelopment was largely inductive, building from observations made about Middle Eastern nations that experienced economic and political dysfunction in the face of bountiful resource endowments. The second wave includes authors who built stronger theories centered on the fiscal contract model of state building. The third wave saw scholars looking to establish the external validity of past claims about the resource curse using large-n data and statistical inference. Entries in the fourth wave share a strong focus on establishing causal inference. Within this set, a relatively recent group of scholars argues against the prevailing wisdom altogether. They cast doubt on the very existence of a resource curse.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are several authors that focus on potential ways to ‘treat’ the resource curse, a topic that is not the main focus of this review. For those interested, Humphreys et al. (2007) is a useful starting point for exploring this literature. See also Darimani and Kebemba (2009) and Sala-i-Martin & Subramanian on how professionals in the policy world seek to address the so-called curse.
- 2.
This contrasts with those Marxists and dependency scholars who focused on class relations.
- 3.
Michael Ross (2015) cites Auty as the first person to use the term ‘resource curse’ in print.
- 4.
See also Ross (2012, p. 206) on this point.
- 5.
The first usage of this term is found in The Economist, 26 November 1977, p. 82, in reference to the decline in the Dutch manufacturing sector following the discovery of the Groningen gas field.
- 6.
Ross retreats somewhat from earlier claims made by him and others about oil’s negative impacts on economic growth, however. He argues that dependence on oil does not lead to negative growth, but instead that oil states are decidedly average in this category. This is itself a puzzle for Ross, given strong priors about how a resource windfall should negatively impact a national economy. Ross argues that oil may have an indirect slowing influence on growth by restricting economic opportunities for women. When women are kept out of the workforce, birth rates increase, resulting in slower per capita growth overall. Further, politicians are unlikely to enact policies to counteract oil’s volatile economic impact, both because of public pressure and because of selection of oil industry-friendly elites into office.
- 7.
Menaldo (2016) responds to this argument, however. He shows that, once oil income per capita is instrumented with giant oil field discoveries and measures of regional oil stocks, and oil exploration efforts are adequately controlled for, the post-1980s period yields no more evidence for a curse than any other period for which there are data. In fact, across both periods there is strong evidence of a resource blessing.
- 8.
The factor endowment approach entails exploiting variation in climate, soil quality, the size of the native population, and disease in order to explain contemporary variation in political and economic institutions. This is useful for addressing questions of the direction of the causal arrow between institutions and dependent variables such as economic growth and democracy. The approach has been used in political science for the last two decades, perhaps most prominently by Acemoglu et al. (2001).
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
Andersen, J., & Ross, M. (2014). The big oil change. Comparative Political Studies, 47(7), 993–1021.
Auty, R. (1990). Resource-based industrialization: Sowing the oil in eight developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beblawi, H., & Luciani, G. (1987). The rentier state. London: Croom Helm.
Beckford, G. (1972). Persistent poverty: Underdevelopment in the plantation regions of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brunnschweiler, C., & Bulte, E. (2008). The resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(3), 248–264.
Brunnschweiler, C., & Bulte, E. (2009). Linking natural resources to slow growth and more conflict. Science, 320, 616–617.
Burgis, T. (2015). The looting machine: Warlords, tycoons, smugglers, and the systematic theft of Africa’s wealth. London: William Collins.
Collier, P. (2000). Economic causes of civil conflict and their implications for policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (1998). On economic causes of Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers, 50(4), 563–573.
Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2002). On the incidence of Civil War in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1), 13–28.
Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595.
Cooley, A. A. (2001). Booms and busts: Theorizing institutional formation and change in oil states. Review of International Political Economy, 8(1), 163–180.
Corden, W. M. (1984). Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: Survey and consolidation. Oxford Economic Papers, 36, 359–380.
Corden, W. M., & Neary, P. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 825–848.
Darimani, A., & Kabemba, C. (2009). Breaking the curse: How transparent taxation and fair taxes can turn Africas mineral wealth into development (K. Lambrechts, Ed.). Johannesburg: Open Society Institute of Southern Africa.
de Soysa, I. (2000). The resource curse: Are civil wars driven by rapacity or paucity? In M. Berdal & D. Malone (Eds.), Greed & grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Dunning, T. (2008). Crude democracy: Natural resource wealth and political regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fearon, J. (2004). Why do some Civil Wars last so much longer than others? Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 275–301.
Fearon, J. (2005). Primary commodity exports and Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 483–507.
Fearon, J., & Laitin, D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and Civil War. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.
Frankel, J. (2010). The natural resource curse: A survey (No. 15836). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gelb, A. (1988). Oil windfalls: Blessing or curse? New York: Oxford University Press.
Girvan, N. (1971). Foreign capital and economic underdevelopment in Jamaica. Jamaica: Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of the West Indies.
Haber, S., & Menaldo, V. (2011). Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 1–26.
Haber, S., Maurer, N., & Razo, A. (2003). The politics of property rights: Political instability, credible commitments, and economic growth in Mexico, 1876–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicks, C. (2015, April 14). Is Chad managing to beat the oil curse? The Guardian.
Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Homer-Dixon, T. (2010). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Humphreys, M. (2005). Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution uncovering the mechanisms. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 508–537.
Humphreys, M., Sachs, J., & Stiglitz, J. (2007). Escaping the resource curse. New York: Columbia University Press.
Indra de Soysa (2000). “The Resource Curse: Are Civil Wars Driven By Rapacity or Paucity?” in Mats Berdal and David Malone eds. Greed & Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Karl, T. L. (1997). The paradox of plenty: Oil booms and petro-states. Berkeley: University of California Press.
LeBillon, P. (2001). The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflicts. Political Geography, 20(5), 561–584.
Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. F. (2007). Natural resources, neither curse nor destiny. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Lei, Y.-H., & Michaels, G. (2014). Do giant oilfield discoveries fuel internal armed conflicts? Journal of Development Economics, 110, 139–157.
Lujala, P., Gleditsch, N. P., & Gilmore, E. (2005). A diamond curse? Civil War and a lootable resource. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 538–562.
Mahdavy, H. (1970). The patterns and problems of economic development in rentier states: The case of Iran. In M. A. Cook (Ed.), Studies in the economic history of the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matsuyama, K. (1992). Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 58(2), 317–334.
Menaldo, V. (2016). The Institutions Curse: Natural Resources, Politics, and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenstein-Rodan, P. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The Economic Journal, 53, 202–211.
Ross, M. (1999). The political economy of the resource curse. World Politics, 51(2), 297–322.
Ross, M. (2001a). Timber booms and institutional breakdown in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, M. (2001b). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325–361.
Ross, M. (2006). A closer look at oil, diamonds, and Civil War. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 265–300.
Ross, M. (2012). The oil curse: How petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ross, M. (2015). What have we learned about the resource curse? Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 239–259.
Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth (No. 5398). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Sala-i-Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the natural resource curse: An illustration from Nigeria (No. 9804). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
The Economist. (2015, June 20). Nigerias moment.
Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van der Ploeg, F. (2011). Natural resources: Curse or blessing? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 366–420.
Watkins, M. (1963). A staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique, 29(2), 141–158.
Yates, D. A. (1996). The rentier state in Africa: Oil rent dependency and neocolonialism in the Republic of Gabon. Trenton: Africa World Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gochberg, W., Menaldo, V. (2016). The Resource Curse Puzzle Across Four Waves of Work. In: Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., Klare, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55630-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55631-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)