Skip to main content

The Resource Curse Puzzle Across Four Waves of Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Handbooks in IPE ((PHIPE))

Abstract

While some countries have developed robust economies and high standards of living, along with stable and democratic political systems, others languish in poverty and are bedeviled by endemic corruption, authoritarianism, and violence. What explains this variation? The notion that there is a resource curse is perhaps the most counterintuitive and controversial hypothesis that has been tendered to address this question. Early work on the idea that oil and minerals doom countries to underdevelopment was largely inductive, building from observations made about Middle Eastern nations that experienced economic and political dysfunction in the face of bountiful resource endowments. The second wave includes authors who built stronger theories centered on the fiscal contract model of state building. The third wave saw scholars looking to establish the external validity of past claims about the resource curse using large-n data and statistical inference. Entries in the fourth wave share a strong focus on establishing causal inference. Within this set, a relatively recent group of scholars argues against the prevailing wisdom altogether. They cast doubt on the very existence of a resource curse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are several authors that focus on potential ways to ‘treat’ the resource curse, a topic that is not the main focus of this review. For those interested, Humphreys et al. (2007) is a useful starting point for exploring this literature. See also Darimani and Kebemba (2009) and Sala-i-Martin & Subramanian on how professionals in the policy world seek to address the so-called curse.

  2. 2.

    This contrasts with those Marxists and dependency scholars who focused on class relations.

  3. 3.

    Michael Ross (2015) cites Auty as the first person to use the term ‘resource curse’ in print.

  4. 4.

    See also Ross (2012, p. 206) on this point.

  5. 5.

    The first usage of this term is found in The Economist, 26 November 1977, p. 82, in reference to the decline in the Dutch manufacturing sector following the discovery of the Groningen gas field.

  6. 6.

    Ross retreats somewhat from earlier claims made by him and others about oil’s negative impacts on economic growth, however. He argues that dependence on oil does not lead to negative growth, but instead that oil states are decidedly average in this category. This is itself a puzzle for Ross, given strong priors about how a resource windfall should negatively impact a national economy. Ross argues that oil may have an indirect slowing influence on growth by restricting economic opportunities for women. When women are kept out of the workforce, birth rates increase, resulting in slower per capita growth overall. Further, politicians are unlikely to enact policies to counteract oil’s volatile economic impact, both because of public pressure and because of selection of oil industry-friendly elites into office.

  7. 7.

    Menaldo (2016) responds to this argument, however. He shows that, once oil income per capita is instrumented with giant oil field discoveries and measures of regional oil stocks, and oil exploration efforts are adequately controlled for, the post-1980s period yields no more evidence for a curse than any other period for which there are data. In fact, across both periods there is strong evidence of a resource blessing.

  8. 8.

    The factor endowment approach entails exploiting variation in climate, soil quality, the size of the native population, and disease in order to explain contemporary variation in political and economic institutions. This is useful for addressing questions of the direction of the causal arrow between institutions and dependent variables such as economic growth and democracy. The approach has been used in political science for the last two decades, perhaps most prominently by Acemoglu et al. (2001).

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J., & Ross, M. (2014). The big oil change. Comparative Political Studies, 47(7), 993–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auty, R. (1990). Resource-based industrialization: Sowing the oil in eight developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beblawi, H., & Luciani, G. (1987). The rentier state. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, G. (1972). Persistent poverty: Underdevelopment in the plantation regions of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnschweiler, C., & Bulte, E. (2008). The resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(3), 248–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnschweiler, C., & Bulte, E. (2009). Linking natural resources to slow growth and more conflict. Science, 320, 616–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgis, T. (2015). The looting machine: Warlords, tycoons, smugglers, and the systematic theft of Africa’s wealth. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2000). Economic causes of civil conflict and their implications for policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (1998). On economic causes of Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers, 50(4), 563–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2002). On the incidence of Civil War in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, A. A. (2001). Booms and busts: Theorizing institutional formation and change in oil states. Review of International Political Economy, 8(1), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W. M. (1984). Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: Survey and consolidation. Oxford Economic Papers, 36, 359–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W. M., & Neary, P. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 825–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darimani, A., & Kabemba, C. (2009). Breaking the curse: How transparent taxation and fair taxes can turn Africas mineral wealth into development (K. Lambrechts, Ed.). Johannesburg: Open Society Institute of Southern Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soysa, I. (2000). The resource curse: Are civil wars driven by rapacity or paucity? In M. Berdal & D. Malone (Eds.), Greed & grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, T. (2008). Crude democracy: Natural resource wealth and political regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. (2004). Why do some Civil Wars last so much longer than others? Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. (2005). Primary commodity exports and Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J., & Laitin, D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and Civil War. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. (2010). The natural resource curse: A survey (No. 15836). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, A. (1988). Oil windfalls: Blessing or curse? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girvan, N. (1971). Foreign capital and economic underdevelopment in Jamaica. Jamaica: Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of the West Indies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, S., & Menaldo, V. (2011). Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haber, S., Maurer, N., & Razo, A. (2003). The politics of property rights: Political instability, credible commitments, and economic growth in Mexico, 1876–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, C. (2015, April 14). Is Chad managing to beat the oil curse? The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. (2010). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M. (2005). Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution uncovering the mechanisms. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 508–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M., Sachs, J., & Stiglitz, J. (2007). Escaping the resource curse. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indra de Soysa (2000). “The Resource Curse: Are Civil Wars Driven By Rapacity or Paucity?” in Mats Berdal and David Malone eds. Greed & Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, T. L. (1997). The paradox of plenty: Oil booms and petro-states. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBillon, P. (2001). The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflicts. Political Geography, 20(5), 561–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. F. (2007). Natural resources, neither curse nor destiny. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Y.-H., & Michaels, G. (2014). Do giant oilfield discoveries fuel internal armed conflicts? Journal of Development Economics, 110, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lujala, P., Gleditsch, N. P., & Gilmore, E. (2005). A diamond curse? Civil War and a lootable resource. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 538–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavy, H. (1970). The patterns and problems of economic development in rentier states: The case of Iran. In M. A. Cook (Ed.), Studies in the economic history of the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama, K. (1992). Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 58(2), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menaldo, V. (2016). The Institutions Curse: Natural Resources, Politics, and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein-Rodan, P. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The Economic Journal, 53, 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1999). The political economy of the resource curse. World Politics, 51(2), 297–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (2001a). Timber booms and institutional breakdown in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (2001b). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (2006). A closer look at oil, diamonds, and Civil War. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 265–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (2012). The oil curse: How petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (2015). What have we learned about the resource curse? Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth (No. 5398). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the natural resource curse: An illustration from Nigeria (No. 9804). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2015, June 20). Nigerias moment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg, F. (2011). Natural resources: Curse or blessing? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 366–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. (1963). A staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique, 29(2), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, D. A. (1996). The rentier state in Africa: Oil rent dependency and neocolonialism in the Republic of Gabon. Trenton: Africa World Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gochberg, W., Menaldo, V. (2016). The Resource Curse Puzzle Across Four Waves of Work. In: Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., Klare, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics