Skip to main content

Introducing Western Lobbying to China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lobbying and Foreign Interests in Chinese Politics

Part of the book series: Politics and Development of Contemporary China ((PDCC))

  • 395 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the research puzzle of foreign interest groups that seek to shape policies in China’s top-down system. It maps China’s political environment, Western interest groups, China’s state–society relations, and briefly elaborates on the differences between Chinese and Western interest groups. As more and more Western companies have invested in China’s vast economy, their ambition to actively influence the policies of China’s authoritarian state has also grown. The existing mechanisms for monitoring the activities of Chinese actors proved ill-suited to exert a similar degree of power over the foreign actors entering the system. This chapter concludes by introducing the methodological rationale of the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumgartner, F., & Leech, B. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton, NJ/Sussex, UK: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J., Eising, R., & Maloney, W. (Eds.) (2010). Interest group politics in Europe. Oxon, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blecher, M., & Shue, V. (2001). Into leather: State-led development and the private sector in Xinji. The China Quarterly, 166, 368–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology? The British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawson, A. (1986). Corporatism and political theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Y.-H., Chang, Y.-T., & Huang, M.-H. (2004). Modernization, institutionalism, traditionalism, and the development of democratic orientation in rural China. In A comparative survey of democracy, governance and development (pp. 1–46). Taipei, Taiwan: Asian Barometer Project Office, National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H. (2007). The change in China’s state governance and its effects upon urban scale. Environment and Planning, 39, 789–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (1979). Inducements versusconstraints: Disaggregating “corporatism”. The American Political Science Review, 73(4), 967–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1967). Pluralist democracy in the United States: Conflict and consent. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences – A pluralist perspective. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire, D., & Derbyshire, I. (1990). Political systems of the world. New Delhi, India: Allied Publisher Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, B. J. (2000–2001). Cooptation and corporatism in China: The logic of party adaptation. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4), 517–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, B. J. (2008). Wealth into power, the communist party’s embrace of China’s private sector. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, D. (2011). Indigenous innovation and globalization –The challenge for China’s standardization strategy. Honolulu, HI: East-West Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, S. (2004). Das politische System der Volksrepublik China (Vol. 2). Wiesbaden, Germany: Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holbig, H., & Gilley, B. (2010). In search of legitimacy in post-revolutionary China: Bringing ideology and governance back in. GIGA Working Papers, 127, 6–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbig, H., & Reichenbach, T. (2005). Verbandliche Interessenvermittlung in der VR China, Der Bund fuer Industrie und Handel zwischen staatlichem Kontrollanspruch und privatwirtschaftlicher Selbstbehauptung. Hamburg, Germany: Institut fuer Asienkunde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. (1994). Refashioning state-society relations in China. The European Journal of Development Research, 6(1), 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J., & Hasmath, R. (2013a). The changing faces of state corporatism. In J. Hsu & R. Hasmath (Eds.), The Chinese corporatist state; Adaption, survival and resistance. Oxon, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J., & Hasmath, R. (Eds.) (2013b). The Chinese corporatist state – Adaption, survival and resistance. Oxon, UK/New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinping, X. (2014). The governance of China. Beijing, China: Foreign Languages Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. (2005). The business of lobbying in China. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. (2009). Comparing formal and informal lobbying practices in China. China Information, XXIII(2), 95–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1982). Patterns of corporatist policy-making. London/Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberthal, K., & Oksenberg, M. (1988). Policy making in China: Leaders, structures, and processes. Princeton, NJ/Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, C. (2008). Brussels versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union (American governance and public policy). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, C. (2013). Refurbishing state capitalism: A policy analysis of efforts to rebalance China’s political economy. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 42(4), 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, C., Lüthje, B., & Ten Brink, T. (2013). Rebalancing China’s emergent capitalism: State power, economic liberalization and social upgrading. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 42(4), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksenberg, M. (2002). China’s political sytem: Challenges of the twenty-first century. In J. Unger (Ed.), The nature of Chinese politics: From Mao to Jiang. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, M. (2005). The business of governing business in China: Institutions and norms of the emerging regulatory state. World Politics, 57(2), 296–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saich, T. (2000). Negotiating the state: The development of social organizations in China. The China Quarterly, 161, 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, R. N., & Guvenli, T. (2001). Relations between multinational firms and host governments: The experience of American-owned firms in China. In J. T. Li (Ed.), Managing international business ventures in China. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1957). Intensity, visibility, direction and scope. The American Political Science Review, 51(4), 933–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 3(6), 85–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shue, V. (1994). State power and social organization in China. In State power and social forces: Domination and transformation in the Third World. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, D. (1993). The governmental process: Political interests and public opinion. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J. (1996). “Bridges”: Private business, the Chinese government and the rise of new associations. The China Quarterly, 147, 795–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J. (2008a). The strange marriage between the state and private business in Beijing. In J. Unger (Ed.), Associations and the Chinese state (pp. 117–148). New York/London: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J. (Ed.) (2008b). Associations and the Chinese state. New York/London: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J., & Chan, A. (1995). China, corporatism, and the East Asian model. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 33, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. (2013). Keep business for business, associations of private enterprises in China. In J. Y. J. Hsu & R. Hasmath (Eds.), The Chinese corporatist state – Adoption, survival and resistance. Oxon, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weil, S. (2017). Introducing Western Lobbying to China. In: Lobbying and Foreign Interests in Chinese Politics. Politics and Development of Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55620-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics