Abstract
This chapter explores the kinship between Sherlock Holmes and Conan Doyle’s next best-known serial protagonist, Professor George Edward Challenger, examining some of the ways that Challenger is a continuation and a criticism of what Holmes embodied. Holmes the “scientific detective” is taken here as an instantiation of the modern professional expert, a pivotal figure in the Victorian knowledge revolution. The portrayal of Holmes’s powers is an index of the awe in which Conan Doyle and his contemporaries held these experts, but it also reveals an anxiety about the way these masters of knowledge could appear inhuman and irresponsible. These tendencies in Holmes reappear in the person of Challenger, the scientific investigator pursuing knowledge with an egotistical disregard for the consequences.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
References in this chapter to Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes stories are to the Penguin edition.
- 2.
For example, the adding machine patented by William Seward Burroughs in 1888, the year after the first appearance of Holmes in print.
- 3.
In A Study in Scarlet Holmes expounds his own theory of interpretative backtelling in his article “The Book of Life,” which speaks of inferring an Atlantic or a Niagara from a drop of water (23).
- 4.
“Rationally regulated association within a structure of domination finds its typical expression in bureaucracy…The charismatic structure of domination rests upon individual authority which is based neither upon rational rules nor upon tradition” (ii 954).
- 5.
For a more detailed exposition of the relation of Doyle’s life and writing to cultures of knowledge, see Kerr (41–122).
- 6.
Masculine pronouns seem appropriate for generalizations about Victorian doctors. See Digby, Loudon, Porter, and Perkin. Women were utterly debarred from the profession until the 1870s, and began to practice in very small numbers thereafter. See Dixon Smith, and Doyle’s story “The Doctors of Hoyland” (Round the Red Lamp 256–72).
- 7.
See Sebeok and Umiker-Sebeok.
- 8.
He wrote about what he saw in Berlin in a letter to the Daily Telegraph (Letters to the Press 35–37), a commissioned article for W. T. Stead’s Review of Reviews (“Dr Koch”), and later in the memoir Memories and Adventures (87–91), in which he details Bergmann’s bullying and unprofessional bad manners as he “rushed on with his court all grinning at the snub which the presumptuous Englishman had received.” Doyle was less critical of Koch, while suggesting, and in later tellings confirming, that Koch’s tuberculin treatment was not an effective cure for the disease. He later claimed his Telegraph letter was “the very first which appeared upon the side of doubt and caution” about the cure (90). See also Kerr (79–99).
- 9.
Challenger does not appear ever to have held a university position, and finances his work by private means. His title may be simply honorific, as seems also to be the case with his irascible exact contemporary, Professor Henry Higgins in Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion (1912). It appears later, in The Land of Mist (278–79), that Challenger did practice as a doctor in his youth.
- 10.
This is a trope that goes back to Aristotle, but had also figured in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, in which scientific research is consistently represented as a stripping and penetration of feminized nature.
Works Cited
Conrad, Joseph. Nostromo. Ed. Jacques Berthoud and Mara Kalnins. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009.
Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species. Ed. J. W. Burrow. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968.
Digby, Anne. The Evolution of British General Practice 1850–1948. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.
Dixon Smith, R. “Feminism and the Role of Women in Conan Doyle’s Domestic Fiction.” ACD: Journal of the Arthur Conan Doyle Society 5 (1994): 50–60.
Doyle, Arthur Conan. “Dr. Koch and his Cure.” Review of Reviews 2.12 (1890): 552–56.
———. Letters to the Press. Ed. John Michael Gibson and Richard Lancelyn Green. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1986.
———. Memories and Adventures. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.
———. Round the Red Lamp: Being Facts and Fancies of Medical Life. Fairfield, IA: First World Library, 2004.
———. The Crime of the Congo. Honolulu: UP of the Pacific, 2004.
———. The Land of Mist. London: Hutchinson, 1926.
———. The Maracot Deep and Other Stories. London: John Murray, 1929.
———. The Penguin Complete Sherlock Holmes. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1981.
Edwards, Owen Dudley. The Quest for Sherlock Holmes: A Biographical Study of Arthur Conan Doyle. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984.
Galton, Francis. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. 2nd edn. London: Frank Cass, 1970.
Huxley, Thomas H. “On the Method of Zadig.” Collected Essays. Vol. 4. London: Macmillan, 1911. 1–23.
Keats, John. “On First Looking into Chapman’s Homer.” The Major Works. 1990 Ed. Elizabeth Cook. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008. 32.
Kerr, Douglas. Conan Doyle: Writing, Profession, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013.
Loudon, Irvine. Medical Care and the General Practitioner 1750–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
Perkin, Harold. The Rise of Professional Society: England Since 1880. 1989. London: Routledge, 1990.
Porter, Roy. Disease, Medicine and Society in England 1550–1860. 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993.
Sebeok, Thomas A. and Jean Umiker-Sebeok, “‘You Know My Method’: A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes.” The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Ed. Umberto Eco and Thomas A. Sebeok. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1983. 11–54.
Shaw, George Bernard. Pygmalion. Ed. Dan H. Laurence. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2003.
Tyndall, John. “The Scientific Use of the Imagination.” Scientific Addresses. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1995. 33–74.
Weber, Max. Economy and Society. 2 vols. Ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley and Los Angeles: U of California P, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kerr, D. (2017). Holmes into Challenger: The Dark Investigator. In: Naidu, S. (eds) Sherlock Holmes in Context. Crime Files. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55595-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55595-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55594-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55595-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)