Skip to main content

Dignity in Organizing from the Perspective of Hannah Arendt’s Worldliness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dignity and the Organization

Part of the book series: Humanism in Business Series ((HUBUS))

  • 1037 Accesses

Abstract

Hannah Arendt is not one of the more frequently cited names in today’s dignity discourse, despite having made an early contribution to the debate popularized (McCrudden 2008) by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In her book, On the Origins of Totalitarianism, written around the time of the declaration and when many were experiencing rightlessness, superfluousness, and statelessness, she devotes a chapter to “the perplexities of the rights of man,” in which she formulates her view of the “right to have rights.” In her foreword, she states that “human dignity needs a new guarantee which can be found only in a new political principle, in a new law on earth” (OT, p. ix).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Birmingham (2006), Menke (2007), Parekh (2008), Ingram (2008), Borren (2010), Schaap (2011), Kesby (2012), and Lacroix (2015).

  2. 2.

    From an organizing point of view Arendt’s writing on rights, speech, and organization is unproblematic, but political theorists who focus on legal rights debate over its meaning applied to citizenship (Ingram 2008; Schaap 2011; Lacroix 2015).

  3. 3.

    As an organizing principle close to the “logic of appropriateness” (March and Olsen 2006) with emphasis on the personal element and freedom.

  4. 4.

    I do not wish to diminish, but rather to complement this action perspective, most thoroughly elaborated by Vino. Hicks’ (2011) experiences of conflict management, where personal storytelling of experiences of dignity breaches opened spaces for communication, and thereby action, can also be read as illuminating Arendt’s view of storytelling as a way to restore dignity to the past and to all the actors and sufferers in the story.

  5. 5.

    I do not sympathize with readings which project a hierarchy between Arendtian activities. Kateb (2007) equates his own hierarchical concept of human status and stature with her existential “values.” Sennett (2009), more influential in organization theory than Arendt and in a tone similar to Kateb, accuses her of lacking respect for the working man.

References

Works by Hannah Arendt Are Referred to by Abbreviations

  • BPF. 1961. Between Past and Future. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OR. 1973a. On Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • OT. 1973b. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • LM. 1978. The Life of the Mind: Part One/Thinking. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • HA. 1979. On Hannah Arendt. In Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, ed. M. Hill. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LKPP. 1982. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. R. Beiner. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EJ. 1974. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. 1994. Essays in Understanding 1930–1954. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • HC. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KMT. 2002. Karl Marx and the Tradition of Western Political Thought. Social Research 69(2): 273–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • PP—Arendt, H. 2005. The Promise of Politics. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnouw, D. 1990. Visible Spaces: Hannah Arendt and the German-Jewish Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, P. 2006. Hannah Arendt and Human Rights: The Predicament of Common Responsibility. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borren, M. 2010. Amor Mundi: Hannah Arendt’s Political Phenomenology of World. Diss., Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M. 1992. Hannah Arendt. A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S.P. 2002. Memory as a Moral Decision: The Role of Ethics in Organizational Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, A. 2008. The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., and A. Spicer. 2007. Contesting the Corporation: Struggle, Power and Resistance in Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, G.K. 2011. Corporation and the Polis. Journal of Business Ethics 103: 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Donna. 2011. Dignity: The Essential Role It Plays in Resolving Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R. 2004. Dignity at Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J.D. 2008. What Is a ‘Right to Have Rights’? Three Images of the Politics of Human Rights. American Political Science Review 102(4): 401–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kateb, G. 2007. Existential Values in Arendt’s Treatment of Evil and Morality. Social Research 74(3): 811–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesby, A. 2012. The Right to Have Rights: Citizenship, Humanity, and International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, J. 2015. The “Right to Have Rights” in French Political Philosophy: Conceptualising a Cosmopolitan Citizenship with Arendt. Constellations 22(1): 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. 2006. The Logic of Appropriateness. In Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, eds. M. Moran, M. Rein, and R.E. Goodin. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrudden, C. 2008. Human. Dignity and Judicial Interpretations of Human Rights European Journal of International Law 19(4): 655–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke, C. 2007. The “Aporias of Human Rights” and the “One Human Right”: Regarding the Coherence of Hannah Arendt’s Argument. Social Research 74(3): 739–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R.P. 2014. Hannah Arendt (1906–1975). In The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies, eds. J. Helin, T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, and R. Holt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1984. Arendt’s Action Philosophy and the Manager as Eichmann, Richard III, Faust, or Institution Citizen. California Management Review 26(3): 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, Serena. 2008. Hannah Arendt and the Challenge of Modernity: A Phenomenology of Human Rights. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, M., and C. Dierksmeier. 2014. Reconnecting Management Theory and Social Welfare: A Humanistic Perspective. Humanistic Management Network (Research Paper No. 13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. 2012. Dignity—Its History and Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. 2009. The Craftsman. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, A. 2011. Enacting the Right to Have Rights: Jacques Rancière’s Critique of Hannah Arendt. European Journal of Political Theory 10(1): 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoelstra, S. 2007. What is Organization? Lund: Lund Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2010. Business Miracles. Culture and Organization 16(1): 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vino, A. 1996. Telling Stories, Reflecting, Learning: Hannah Arendt and Organization. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 2(2): 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virno, P. 2004. A Grammar of the Multitude. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. 2006. Arendt’s Constitutional Politics. In The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, ed. D. Villa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Bruehl, E. 1982. Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ingman, S. (2017). Dignity in Organizing from the Perspective of Hannah Arendt’s Worldliness. In: Kostera, M., Pirson, M. (eds) Dignity and the Organization. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55562-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics