Abstract
Existing theories on human capital, labor market segmentation, and discrimination fail to fully explain gender gaps—for example, the large gender gap in elite occupations where women apparently possess high labor market power. This chapter seeks a more complete, occupation-related understanding, through the interaction between labor segmentation, regulation content, and regulation distance, the last referring to the extent to which employment of particular workers is (un)regulated. Regulation distance encompasses a continuum from “regulation proximity” to “market proximity.” The domestic sphere, the state, unions, and class relations all influence the content of regulation. Each of these also influences norms by which groups in power operate. A greater reliance on the “market” does not necessarily remove pay distortions; rather, it might increase their impact through gendered norms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peetz, D. (2017). Regulation Distance, Labor Segmentation, and Gender Gaps. In: Peetz, D., Murray, G. (eds) Women, Labor Segmentation and Regulation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55495-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55495-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56122-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55495-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)