Advertisement

Jérôme Bel pp 173-223 | Cite as

Critical Subjects

  • Gerald SiegmundEmail author
Chapter
  • 216 Downloads
Part of the New World Choreographies book series (NWC)

Abstract

“Critical Subjects” shifts the focus away from the production of knowledge to aspects of power inherent in contemporary dance practices and its institutions. From 2004 to 2009 in pieces like Véronique Doisneau, Pichet Klunchun and Myself, Cédric Andrieux, and Lutz Förster, Jérôme Bel allows dancers to take centre stage and speak about their working experiences in their respective dance companies. Drawing on Judith Butler’s notion of subjectivity and Michel Foucault’s idea of critique, Bel’s work on the subjugating practices of dance companies can be read as an act of desubjugation and emancipation for the dancing subjects. In regard to Pichet Klunchun and Myself the question arises if emancipation may be achieved under post-colonial conditions.

Keywords

Andrieux Dance Practice Contemporary Dance Dance Company discourseDiscourse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barker, Clive. 1996. The Possibilities and Politics of Intercultural Penetration and Exchange. In The Intercultural Performance Studies Reader, ed. Patrice Pavis, 247–256. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, Una. 2008. Jérôme Bel. An Interview. Performance Research 13 (1): 42–48.Google Scholar
  3. Bel, Jérôme. Cedric Andrieux. No credits.Google Scholar
  4. Bel, Jérôme. 2004. Véronique Doisneau. Directed by Jérôme Bel at Pierre Dupouey. Opéra National de Paris Telemondis, France 2, and Mezzo.Google Scholar
  5. Bel, Jérôme. 2006. Pichet Klunchun and Myself. Taipeh, Taiwan: Novel Dance.Google Scholar
  6. Bel, Jérôme. 2007. Email conversation with Gerald Siegmund. May, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  7. Bel, Jérôme. 2009. Lutz Förster. Directed by Andrea Keiz. Berlin: Mime Centrum.Google Scholar
  8. Bel, Jérôme. 2011. Pichet Klunchun and Myself. Directed by Aldo Lee and Jérôme Bel. Brussels: Kaaitheater.Google Scholar
  9. Bel, Jérôme, and Boris Charmatz. 2013. Emails 2009–2010. Dijon: Les presses du réel.Google Scholar
  10. Burt, Ramsay. 2017. Ungoverning Dance. Contemporary European Theatre Dance and the Commons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power. Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, Judith. 2004. What is Critique? An Essay on Foucault’s Virtue. In The Judith Butler Reader, ed. Sara Salih with Judith Butler, 302–322. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Chatterjea, Ananya. 2013. On the Value of Mistranslations and Contaminations: The Category of “Contemporary Choreography“ in Asian Dance. DRJ: Dance Research Journal 41 (1): 7–21.Google Scholar
  14. Dean, Tim. 2000. Beyond Sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dickinson, Peter. 2014. Cédric Andrieux: With Bel, Benjamin, and Brecht in Vancouver. TDR: The Drama Review 58 (Fall): 162–169.Google Scholar
  16. Dolar, Mladen. 2006. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Finter, Helga. 2014a. Das Kameraauge des Postmodernen Theaters. In Die soufflierte Stimme: Text, Theater, Medien, 47–66. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  18. Finter, Helga. 2014b. Zur Dioptrik von Text, Bühne und Zuschauer. In Die soufflierte Stimme: Text, Theater, Medien, 221–230. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Foster, Susan Leigh. 2011. Choreographing Empathy. Kinesthesia in Performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, Michel. 1977. What is an Author? In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, trans. Donald F. Bouchard and Sherry Simon, ed. Donald F. Bouchard, 113–138. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, Michel. 1997. What is Enlightenment? In Ethics. The Essential Works 1, ed. Paul Rabinow, 303–319. London: Alan Lane and The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, Michel. 2000. The Subject and Power. In Power: The Essential Works 3, ed. James D. Faubion, 326–348. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  23. Freud, Sigmund. 2001. Instincts and their Vicissitudes. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XIV (1914–1916), trans. James Strachey and Anna Freud, 109–140. London: Vintage the Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hardt, Yvonne. 2011. Staging the Ethnographic of Dance History: Contemporary Dance and Its Play with Tradition. DRJ: Dance Research Journal 43 (1): 27–42.Google Scholar
  25. Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture. The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  26. Kristeva, Julia. 1998. Das Theater der Psyche. In Grenzgänge. Das Theater und die anderen Künste, ed. Grabriele Brandstetter, Helga Finter, and Markus Weßendorf, 23–30. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
  27. Kwan, SanSan. 2014. Even As We Keep Trying: An Ethics of Interculturalism in Jérôme Bel’s Pichet Klunchun and Myself. Theatre Survey 55 (2): 185–201.Google Scholar
  28. Laplanche, Jean, and Jean-Bertrand Pontalis. 1988. The Language of Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lepecki, André. 2006. Exhausting Dance. Performance and the Politics of Movement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lepecki, André. 2007. Choreography as Apparatus of Capture. TDR: The Drama Review 51: 119–123.Google Scholar
  31. Melly, George. 1972. Revolt into Style: Pop Arts in Britain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Osborne, Peter. 2013. Anywhere or Not at All. Philosophy of Contemporary Art. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. Pavis, Patrice (ed.). 1996. The Intercultural Performance Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  35. Schechner, Richard and Pavis, Patrice. 1996. Interculturalism and the Culture of Choice. In The Intercultural Performance Reader, ed. Partrice Pavis, 41–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Siegmund, Gerald. 2006. Abwesenheit. Eine performative Ästhetik des Tanzes. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siegmund, Gerald. 2012a. Cédric Andrieux von Jérôme Bel. Choreographische Strategien der Subjektwerdung. In Theater und Subjektkonstitution. Theatrale Praktiken zwischen Affirmation und Subversion, ed. Friedemann Kreuder, Michael Bachmann, Julia Pfahl, and Dorothea Volz, 41–54. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  38. Siegmund, Gerald. 2012b. Negotiating Choreography, Letter, and Law in William Forsythe. In New German Dance Studies, eds. Susan Manning and Lucia Ruprecht, 200–216. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  39. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorti. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson, and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams, David (ed.). 1992. Peter Brook and the Mahabharata. Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Internet Sources

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Justus-Liebig UniversityGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations