Abstract
Thanks to the EU citizenship and other EU principles, citizens of the EU member-states may have access to the public services of a member-state they are not citizen of. This access is called transnational access. Taking the example of the transnational access to social security rights, this chapter shows that, to ensure its implementation, the EU created obligations of cooperation between the member-states and backed them by dense and complex cooperation mechanisms including support bodies; hence the expression of ‘administrative machineries’ to qualify these elements. The chapter discusses the scope of the legal obligations of cooperation, together with the frameworks and forms according to which cooperation has to be fulfilled to concretely grant these transnational accesses.
References
Azoulai, L. (2007). Le principe de bonne administration. In J. Dutheil de la Rochère & J.-B. Auby (dir.), Droit administratif européen. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Azoulai, L. (2010). La citoyenneté européenne, un statut d’intégration sociale. In Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean-Paul Jacqué (p. 1). Paris: Dalloz.
Barcevicius, E., Weishaup, T., & Zeitlin, J. (2014). Assessing the open method of coordination: Institutional design and national influence of eu social policy coordination. Basingstocke: Palgrave MacMilan.
Barnard, C., & Peers, S. (2014). European union law. Oxford: OUP.
Chevalier, E. (2014). Bonne administration et Union européenne. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Damay, L., & Mercenier, H. (2016). Free movement and EU citizenship: A virtuous circle? Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1186212.
European Commission. (2011). Administrative commission for the coordination of social security systems in explanatory notes on modernized social security coordination.
European Commission. (2013). EU citizenship Report 2013—EU citizens: Your rights, your future, COM(2013) 269 final.
European Commission. (2017). EU citizenship Report 2017—Strengthening citizen’s Rights in a Union of democratic change, Publication office of the European Union.
Iliopoulou, A. (2008). Libre circulation et non-discrimination, éléments du statut de citoyen de l’UE. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
ILO—International Labour Organisation. (2010). Coordination of social security systems in the European Union: An explanatory report on EC regulation No 883/2004 and its implementing regulation No 987/2009. Geneva: ILO.
ICF GHK in association with Milieu. (2013). A fact finding analysis on the impact on the Member States social security systems of the entitlements of non-active intra-EU migrants to special non-contributory cash benefits and healthcare granted on the basis of residence. Final report, DG employment, social affairs and inclusion via DG justice framework contract.
Goudappel, F. (2010). The effects of EU citizenship, economic, social and political rights in a time of constitutional change. Den Haag: TMC Asser.
Jorens, Y. (Ed.). (2009). 50 years of social security coordination Past—Present—Future. report of the conference celebrating the 50th anniversary of the European coordination of social security, Prague 7 and 8 May 2009, European Commission, DG employment, social affairs and equal opportunities.
Lafarge, F. (2010). Administrative cooperation between member states and implementation of EU Law. European Public Law, 16, 597–616.
Majone, G. (2005). Dilemmas of European integration: The ambiguities and pitfalls of integration by stealth. Oxford: Oxford University.
Mangan, G. (2016). Eu social security law: A commentary on eu regulations 883/3004 and 987/2009. Administration, 54, 1.
Marzo, G. (2011). La dimension sociale de la citoyenneté Européenne. Aix-en-Provence: PUAM.
Mendes, J. (2009). La bonne administration en droit communautaire et le code Européen de bonne conduite administrative. Revue française d’administration publique, 131, 555–571.
Metcalfe, L. (1994). International policy co-ordination and public management reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 60, 271–290.
Pennings, F. (2015). Principles of EU coordination of social security. In F. Pennings & G. Vonk (Eds.), Research handbook on European social security law. London: Edward Elgar.
Poptcheva, E. -M. (2014). Freedom of movement and residence of EU citizens. Access to social benefits, European Parliamentary Research Service, 140808REV1.
Rogers, N., Scannell, R., & Walsh, J. (2012). Free movement of persons in the enlarged European union. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Schneider, J.-P. (2014). Basic structure of information management in the European administrative union. European Public Law, 20(1), 89–106.
Van Overmeiren, F., Eichenhofer, E., & Verschueren, H., (Eds.), (2011). Social security coverage of non-active persons moving to another member state. Organisation and coordination of a network on the coordination of social security schemes in the European union, Project DG EMPL—VC/2010/0436.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lafarge, F. (2018). EU Citizens and Public Services: The Machinery Behind the Principles. In: Ongaro, E., Van Thiel, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55268-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55269-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)