Skip to main content
  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

In the final part of her autobiography Histoire de ma vie [Story of my Life] (1854–55), George Sand provided a surprising take on her own career trajectory: she would, she claimed, rather have been a digger than a writer. This chapter takes as its point of departure Sand’s fleeting fantasy of a life of hard labour with a view to re-examining her reflections on the legitimacy and ethics of the writer’s vocation. Sand’s dream of class solidarity, achieved through shared physical work, is read alongside her defence of the worker-poet. The latter’s radical refusal of a prevailing social division of manual and intellectual labour provides, it is argued, a model of transgression that informs Sand’s own account of her work as writer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    English translations are my own, except where indicated.

  2. 2.

    Janet Beizer links this passage from Histoire de ma vie to the central role Sand attributes to the ‘chanvreur’ [hemp raker] in her pastoral trilogy of novels (1846–49). The association of manual labour and writing is born of ‘ce besoin constant d’effectuer une réconciliation’ [this constant need to bring about a reconciliation] (106).

  3. 3.

    In a letter to her son Maurice, written in the Autumn of 1843, Sand described the overhaul of her garden that she was undertaking: ‘Le jardin n’offre que trous, plates-bandes retournées, terres sens dessus dessous. On dirait d’un champ labouré’ [The garden is nothing but holes, dug-up flower beds, and all the ground is turned over. It looks like a ploughed field]. 1970–71, 6, 274.

  4. 4.

    Sand famously played a decisive role in the provisional government, producing propaganda in support of its ideals. See Hamon, 233–302.

  5. 5.

    Working-class writers assisted by Sand include the carpenter Agricol Perdiguier, the locksmith Jérôme Gilland, and the weaver Magu. See also her article on ‘Les poëtes populaires’ of November 1841 (1878, 73–8). For a developed account of Sand’s correspondence with Poncy, see Brigitte Diaz.

  6. 6.

    The note was designed to preface two of his collections of verse: Marines [Seascapes] and Le Chantier [The Building Yard].

  7. 7.

    Diaz discerns a similar imperative in Sand’s correspondence with Poncy: ‘elle tient à ce que le poète n’évince pas en lui l’ouvrier. C’est au contraire l’alliage de ces deux identités, incompatibles selon l’ordre bourgeois, qu’elle prise’ (313) [she is eager for the poet not to replace the worker in him. On the contrary, it is the conjoining of these two identities, held to be incompatible by the bourgeois order, that she values].

  8. 8.

    A similar point is made by William Sewell. Charges of naivety or political inefficacy aside, ‘The very existence of worker-poets, the coupling of the terms poête and ouvrier, was itself a novel and potent statement about labour’ (236).

  9. 9.

    ‘Soiez plûtost Maçon, si c’est vostre talent,/Ouvrier estimé dans un art nécessaire,/Qu’Ecrivain du commun et Poëte vulgaire’ [Be a stonemason instead, if this is your talent/An esteemed worker in a necessary art/Than a common writer and a vulgar poet] (Boileau-Despréaux, 110).

  10. 10.

    See Sand’s 1851 ‘Notice’ to Le Compagnon du Tour France [The Companion of the Tour of France] (1840), in which she reflects on the scandal produced by her hero, a ‘prolétaire philosophe’ [proletarian philosopher]: ‘on cria, dans certaines classes, à l’impossible, à l’exagération, on m’accusa de flatter le peuple et de vouloir l’embellir. Eh bien, pourquoi non?’ [in some classes, this was declared impossible, an exaggeration. I was accused of flattering the people, and wanting to embellish them. Well, why not?] (1988, 31).

  11. 11.

    Published in Le Charivari on 26 February 1844. Its caption reads: ‘La mère est dans le feu de la composition, l’enfant est dans l’eau de la baignoire!’ [The mother is in the heat of composition, the baby is in the bathwater!].

Works Cited

  • Barthes, Roland. (1967) Writing Degree Zero, trans. Annette Lavers and Colin Smith. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beizer, Janet. (2004) ‘“Écoute le chant du labourage”: chant et travail de l’écriture dans “Les Veillées du chanvreur”’, Littérature, 134: 195–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boileau-Despréaux, Nicolas. (1939) Épîtres. Art poétique. Lutrin, ed. Charles-H. Boudhors. Paris: Société les Belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boime, Albert. (2007) Art in an Age of Civil Struggle, 1848–1871. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, Brigitte. (1998) ‘Portrait de l’artiste en maçon. La correspondance entre George Sand et Charles Poncy (1842–1876)’, in Le Siècle de George Sand, ed. David A. Powell. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 309–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilland, Jérôme. (1849) Conteurs ouvriers: dédiés aux enfants des classes laborieuses. Preface by George Sand. Paris: [author].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamon, Bernard. (2001) George Sand et la politique. ‘Cette vilaine chose…’. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaney, Seamus. (1966) Death of a Naturalist. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiddleston, Janet. (1999) George Sand and Autobiography. Oxford: Legenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. (1878) French Poets and Novelists. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, Édouard. (2015) La Dame de Nohant, ou La Vie passionnée de George Sand. Paris: Éditions Publibook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, Manon. (2016) ‘“L’esprit, le cœur et les bras”: Rethinking Art as Labour in George Sand’, The Modern Language Review, 111: 104–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naginski, Isabelle. (1991) George Sand: Writing for Her Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1996) ‘Piocheurs sublimes: Sand et Flaubert épistoliers’, in De Baudelaire à Lorca: approches de la modernité littéraire, vol. 1, ed. José Manuel Losada Goya. Kassel: Édition Reichenberger, 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (2013) Republic, ed. and trans. Christ Emlyn-Jones and William Preddy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poncy, Charles. (1846) Poésies de Charles Poncy. Paris: Bureau de la société de l’industrie fraternelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, Christopher. (1986) The Order of Mimesis: Balzac, Stendhal, Nerval, Flaubert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. (2012) Proletarian Nights: The Workers’ Dream in Nineteenth-Century France, trans. John Drury, with an Introduction by Donald Reid. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2009) ‘Smoke Rings: Worker-Poets in the France of Louis-Philippe’, in Poetry and Cultural Studies: A Reader, ed. Maria Damon and Ira Livingston. Urbana: Illinois Press, 237–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Martine. (2003) Signer Sand: l’œuvre et le nom. Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Kristin. (2008) The Emergence of Social Space: Rimbaud and the Paris Commune. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruskin, John. (2007) The Stones of Venice, 3 vols. New York: Cosimo.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1905) The Works of John Ruskin, vol. 20, ed. E. T. Cook and Alexander Wedderburn. London: George Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainte-Beuve, Charles-Augustin. (1857) Causeries du lundi, 3rd edn, vol. 1. Paris: Garnier Frères.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand, George. (1964–91) Correspondance, 26 vols, ed. Georges Lubin. Paris: Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2005) François le champi, ed. André Fermigier. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1988) Le Compagnon du Tour de France, ed. René Bourgeois. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2011) Œuvres complètes, 1845–46: Kourroglou, Teverino, La Mare au Diable, ed. Françoise Genevray and Véronique Bui. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2013) Œuvres complètes, 1849: La petite Fadette, ed. Andrée Mansau. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1970–71) Œuvres autobiographiques, 2 vols, ed. Georges Lubin. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1878) Questions d’art et de littérature. Paris: Calmann Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, Naomi. (1993) George Sand and Idealism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard. (2008) The Craftsman. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, William. (1980) Work and Revolution in France: The Language of Labour from the Old Regime to 1848. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

White, C. (2018). George Sand, Digging. In: Waithe, M., White, C. (eds) The Labour of Literature in Britain and France, 1830-1910. Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55253-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics