Abstract
The founding of the Arts in Education Program (AIE) at the Harvard Graduate School of Education provides an example of replicable reform that uncovers and builds on in-place resources and practices. In this chapter, the author tells the story of the inception and development of this one-year master’s program that supports individualized arts-related pathways through a mainstream curriculum. With an eye to replication, the author concludes by outlining a generalizable framework and guidelines for adaptation of this flourishing model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arts in Education Concentration. (1997). John Landrum Bryant 1996–7 Lecture/Performance Gift Tribute Series Collection. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
BoixMansilla, V. (2006). Interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical examinations of expert interdisciplinary epistemologies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 24, 1–31.
Burton, J. (1981). Lines, space, and the organization of meaning in human figure drawings made by children eight to fifteen years, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.
Davis, J. H. (1991). Artistry lost: U-shaped development in graphic symbolization, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.
Davis, J. H. (1993). The co-arts assessment handbook. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero, President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Davis, J. H. (1996). The MUSE BOOK (Museums uniting with schools in education: Building on our knowledge). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero, Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.
Davis, J. H. (Ed.). (2001). Passion and industry: Schools that focus on the arts. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Davis, J. H. (2005). Framing education as art: The Octopus has a good day. New York: Teachers College Press.
Davis, J. H. (2008). Why our schools need the arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
Davis, J. H. (2012). Why our high schools need the arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
Davis, J. H., & Gardner, H. (1992). The cognitive revolution: Its consequences for the understanding and education of the child as artist. In B. Reimer & R. A. Smith (Eds.), The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing: Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 92–123). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Davis, J. H., Soep, L., Remba, N., Maira, S., & Putnoi, D. (1993). Safe havens: Portraits of educational effectiveness in community art centers that focus on education in economically disadvantaged communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero, Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.
Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1989). Zero-based arts education: An introduction to ARTS PROPEL. Studies in Art Education, 30, 71–83.
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. London: Oxford University Press.
Gombrich, E. (1995[orig. 1950]). The story of art (16th ed.). London: Phaidon Publishers, distributed by Oxford University Press.
Harvard Graduate School of Education. (1999). Challenge, Fall, 1999, a publication for alumni and friends, Development Office, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Ed. Andy Hrycyna. Cambridge, MA
Housen, A. (1983). The eye of the beholder: Measuring aesthetic development, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.
Housen, A. (2002). Aesthetic thought, critical thinking and transfer. Arts Learning Journal, 2002(18), 1.
Kellogg, R. (1967). The psychology of children’s art. New York: Random House Publication.
Korzenik, D. (1972). Children’s drawings: changes in representation between the ages of five and seven, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.
Lightfoot, S. L. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. New York: Basic books.
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. L., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mann, T. (1989). Tonio Kröger. In Death in Venice and seven other stories (pp. 75–132). New York: Vintage Books.
Murphy, J. (1996). March 13. Personal communication
Perkins, D. (1994). The intelligent eye: Learning to think by looking at art. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Education Institute for the Arts.
Smith, N. (1972). Developmental origins of graphic symbolization in the paintings of children three to five, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.
Smith, N. (1983). Experience and art. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sondheim, S. (1991). Sunday in the park with George [libretto]. New York: Applause Theatre Book Publishers.
Sutherland, D. (1989). Jack Levine: A feast of pure reason. http://davidsutherland.com/films/jack-levine-feast-of-pure-reason
Tolstoy, L. (1996 [orig. 1898]). What is art? New York: Viking Penguin Books.
Weigle, M. (1982). Spiders and spinsters: Women and mythology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, J.H. (2016). Persuasion and Structure: Reform as Recognition from Within. In: Hoffmann Davis, J. (eds) Discourse and Disjuncture between the Arts and Higher Education. The Arts in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55243-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55243-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56195-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55243-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)