Skip to main content

Persuasion and Structure: Reform as Recognition from Within

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discourse and Disjuncture between the Arts and Higher Education

Part of the book series: The Arts in Higher Education ((AHE))

  • 367 Accesses

Abstract

The founding of the Arts in Education Program (AIE) at the Harvard Graduate School of Education provides an example of replicable reform that uncovers and builds on in-place resources and practices. In this chapter, the author tells the story of the inception and development of this one-year master’s program that supports individualized arts-related pathways through a mainstream curriculum. With an eye to replication, the author concludes by outlining a generalizable framework and guidelines for adaptation of this flourishing model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arts in Education Concentration. (1997). John Landrum Bryant 1996–7 Lecture/Performance Gift Tribute Series Collection. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • BoixMansilla, V. (2006). Interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical examinations of expert interdisciplinary epistemologies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 24, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1981). Lines, space, and the organization of meaning in human figure drawings made by children eight to fifteen years, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (1991). Artistry lost: U-shaped development in graphic symbolization, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (1993). The co-arts assessment handbook. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero, President and Fellows of Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (1996). The MUSE BOOK (Museums uniting with schools in education: Building on our knowledge). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero, Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (Ed.). (2001). Passion and industry: Schools that focus on the arts. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (2005). Framing education as art: The Octopus has a good day. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (2008). Why our schools need the arts. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (2012). Why our high schools need the arts. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., & Gardner, H. (1992). The cognitive revolution: Its consequences for the understanding and education of the child as artist. In B. Reimer & R. A. Smith (Eds.), The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing: Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 92–123). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Soep, L., Remba, N., Maira, S., & Putnoi, D. (1993). Safe havens: Portraits of educational effectiveness in community art centers that focus on education in economically disadvantaged communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero, Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1989). Zero-based arts education: An introduction to ARTS PROPEL. Studies in Art Education, 30, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. (1995[orig. 1950]). The story of art (16th ed.). London: Phaidon Publishers, distributed by Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Graduate School of Education. (1999). Challenge, Fall, 1999, a publication for alumni and friends, Development Office, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Ed. Andy Hrycyna. Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Housen, A. (1983). The eye of the beholder: Measuring aesthetic development, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housen, A. (2002). Aesthetic thought, critical thinking and transfer. Arts Learning Journal, 2002(18), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. (1967). The psychology of children’s art. New York: Random House Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korzenik, D. (1972). Children’s drawings: changes in representation between the ages of five and seven, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, S. L. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. L., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. (1989). Tonio Kröger. In Death in Venice and seven other stories (pp. 75–132). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (1996). March 13. Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1994). The intelligent eye: Learning to think by looking at art. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Education Institute for the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1972). Developmental origins of graphic symbolization in the paintings of children three to five, a thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1983). Experience and art. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sondheim, S. (1991). Sunday in the park with George [libretto]. New York: Applause Theatre Book Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, D. (1989). Jack Levine: A feast of pure reason. http://davidsutherland.com/films/jack-levine-feast-of-pure-reason

  • Tolstoy, L. (1996 [orig. 1898]). What is art? New York: Viking Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, M. (1982). Spiders and spinsters: Women and mythology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, J.H. (2016). Persuasion and Structure: Reform as Recognition from Within. In: Hoffmann Davis, J. (eds) Discourse and Disjuncture between the Arts and Higher Education. The Arts in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55243-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics