Abstract
At its very best, the study of art education in higher education is a rich field of inquiry that knows no bounds. At its worst, it is a subject that has separated learning from the contemporary art field and left us with a fleet of teachers more concerned with meeting standards and developing lesson plans. In contrast, the concept of the artist-teacher is rooted in the nineteenth century but has ramifications for the contemporary classroom. Through a review of several art teachers in higher education, their studio and classroom work is analyzed in order to highlight artistic dispositions that translate into educational practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, J. (2003). The artist-teacher scheme as postgraduate professional development in higher education. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 22(2), 183–194.
Baldessari, J. (1992, April 4). C. Knight (Tape recording and transcript). Oral history interview with John Baldessari. Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Bell, C. V. (1945). Pasmore, Harmondsworth. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
Carter, M. R. (2014). The teacher monologues: Exploring the identities and experiences of artist-teachers. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cho, J. M. (1993). Hans Hofmann and Josef Albers: The significance of their examples as artist-teachers. Ed.D. Diss., Columbia University, Teachers College, New York.
Daichendt, G. J. (2010). Artist-teacher: A philosophy for creating and teaching. Bristol: Intellect.
Danto, A. (1998). After the end of art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Davidts, W., & Paice, K. (2009). Introduction. In W. Davidts & K. Paice (Eds.), The fall of the studio: Artists at work (pp. 1–22). Valiz: Antennae.
Davis, J. H. (2005). Framing education as art: The octopus has a good day. New York: Teachers College Press.
Efland, A. (1990). A history of art education: Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
Elkins, J. (2001). Why art cannot be taught. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Field, R. S. (1974). Richard Hamilton graphics. Edinburgh: Scottish Arts Council.
Hamilton, R. (1983). Collected Works. London: Thames and Hudson.
Herne, S., Cox, S., & Watts, R. (2009). Readings in primary art education. Bristol: Intellect Books.
Hickman, R. (2005). Why we make art and why it is taught. Bristol: Intellect Books.
Horne, H. H. (1916). The teacher as artist: An essay in education as an aesthetic process. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Lanier, V. (1959). Affectation and art education. Art Education, 12(7), 10, 21.
Lim, H. (2006). Influences of studio practice on art teachers’ professional identities. Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Edication, the University of Iowa.
Logan, F. M. (1955). Growth of art in American schools. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Macdonald, S. (1970). The history and philosophy of art education. London: University of London Press.
McCracken, W. (1959). Artist-teacher: A symptom of growth in art education. Art Education, 12(9), 4–5.
McDermott, M. (2002). Collaging pre-service teacher identity. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(4), 53–68.
Morphet, R. (1992). Richard Hamilton: The longer view (pp. 11–26). London: Tate Gallery.
Packer, W. (1998, Jan. 16). That Very English Bogey man: For a while even more than his contemporaries, Victor Pasmore was the Epitome of the Modern Artist, Financial Times, pp. 15.
Pardo, P., & Dean, R. (2012). The making of John Baldessari’s cremation project. New Haven, CT: Yale Press. Retrieved from https://yalepress.wordpress.com/2012/07/24/the-making-of-john-baldessaris-cremation-project/.
Siegesmund, R. (1998). Why do we teach art today? Conceptions of Art Education and 132 their justification. Studies in Art Education, 39(3), 197–214.
Yeomans, R. (1987). The foundation course of Victor Pasmore and Richard Hamilton 1954–1966. Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, Institute of Education.
Zwirn, S. G. (2002). To be or not to be: The teaching-artist conundrum. Ed.D. dissertation. New York: Teachers College. Columbia University. Chapter Three.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daichendt, G.J. (2016). The Artist-Teacher: Models of Experiential Learning. In: Hoffmann Davis, J. (eds) Discourse and Disjuncture between the Arts and Higher Education. The Arts in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55243-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55243-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56195-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55243-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)