Skip to main content

Turkish Academics’ Encounters with the Index in Social Sciences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universities in the Neoliberal Era

Part of the book series: Palgrave Critical University Studies ((PCU))

Abstract

This chapter is an ethnographic attempt to interrogate the changing nature of the relationship between everyday academic life, knowledge production practices, and expansive use of information and communication technologies in higher education in Turkey. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in Ankara, the capital of Turkey, I argue that performance-based evaluation systems influence academics’ understanding of scientific knowledge and publication, generating new coping strategies in the neoliberal academia. Most academics feel neither safe nor empowered in neoliberal universities that manage them according to points, performance indicators, competition, academic titles, and time pressure. While the academics’ responses to such transformations vary between resistance and acceptance due to their different profiles and personal skills, for many, the neoliberal restructuring of university creates despair.

The present chapter is part of an ongoing doctoral research project exploring the experiences of social scientists regarding the use of information and communication technologies. The project is supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, Hacettepe University, Turkey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bino, P. G. D., & Krishna, M. (2011). Does Social Network Matter in Knowledge Output? Science, Technology & Society, 16(2), 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binz-Scharf, M. C., Kalish, Y., & Paik, L. (2015). Making Science: New Generations of Collaborative Knowledge Production. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(5), 531–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (1994). The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism. Critical Inquiry, 20(2), 328–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R. (2014). Playing the Citations Game: From Publish or Perish to be Cited or Sidelined. Australasian Marketing Journal, 22, 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1). doi:10.1086/517897

  • Goffman, E. (1990). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. (2014). Academic Sell-Out: How an Obsession with Metrics and Rankings is Damaging Academia. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 24(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A. W. (2007). Publish or Perish. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm

  • Hine, C. (2006). Databases as Scientific Instruments and Their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemielniak, D., & Greenwood, D. J. (2015). Wake Up or Perish: Neo-Liberalism, the Social Sciences, and Salvaging the Public University. Cultural Studies⇔Critical Methodologies, 15(1), 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. A. (2002). Rank Injustice. Nature, 415, 835–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. A. (2003). The Politics of Publication. Nature, 422, 259–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. A. (2008). Lost in Publication: How Measurement Harms Science. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 9–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2014). Academic Capitalism. Universities in the Global Struggle for Excellence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelger, C., & Grottke, M. (2015). What about the Future of the Academy? Some Remarks on the Looming Colonisation of Doctoral Education. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. (1992). Performance and Accountability in “Post-Industrial Society”: The Crisis of British Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 17(2), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purani, K., Sahadev, S., & Kumar, D. S. (2014). Globalization and Academic Research: The Case of Sustainability Marketing. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 3(1), 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez Medina, L. (2013). Centers and Peripheries in Knowledge Production. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, F. R. (1992). Origins of Bibliometrics, Citation Indexing, and Citation Analysis: The Neglected Legal Literature. Journal of The American Society for Information Science, 43(5), 337–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (2010). Academic Capitalism and The New Economy: Markets, State and Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2011). Another Science is Possible! A Plea for Slow Science, pp. 1–13. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from http://we.vub.ac.be/aphy/sites/default/files/stengers2011_pleaslowscience.pdf

  • Vostal, F. (2015). Speed Kills, Speed Thrills: Constraining and Enabling Accelerations in Academic Work-Life. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(3), 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A. (2015). The Rules of the Game: A Short Guide for PhD Students and New Academics on Publishing in Academic Journals. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (2011). Journal List Fetishism and the Perversion of Scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS List. Organization, 18(4), 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Çetinkaya, E. (2017). Turkish Academics’ Encounters with the Index in Social Sciences. In: Ergül, H., Coşar, S. (eds) Universities in the Neoliberal Era. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55212-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55212-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55211-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55212-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics