Advertisement

Climate Change and Moral Philosophy

  • Tim MulganEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Drawing on the author’s 2011 book Ethics for a Broken World, this chapter asks whether Rawlsian political liberalism could adapt to a broken world where resources are insufficient to meet everyone’s basic needs and our affluent way of life is no longer an option. This credible future lacks three presumptions of recent moral and political thought: future people are worse-off than present people; the interests of different generations conflict sharply; and Rawlsian favourable conditions have been lost. The chapter explores the moral impact of these differences through a lecture from an imaginary philosopher in the broken future who seeks to adapt Rawls to her world.

Keywords

Broken world Climate change Favourable conditions Future people Inter-generational justice Rawls 

Bibliography

  1. Dreben, B. On Rawls and political liberalism, in Freeman, S., ed. (2003), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Haidt, J. (2012), The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion, Penguin: Great Britain.Google Scholar
  3. Mulgan, T. (2007), Understanding Utilitarianism, Acumen: Durham.Google Scholar
  4. Mulgan, T. (2011), Ethics for a broken world: reimagining philosophy after catastrophe, Acumen: Durham.Google Scholar
  5. Mulgan, T. (2015a), Theory and intuition in a broken world, in T. Chappell (ed.), Intuition, theory, and anti-theory, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
  6. Mulgan, T. (2015b), Utilitarianism for a Broken World, Utilitas, 27, pp. 92–114.Google Scholar
  7. Mulgan, T. (2016a), Answering to Future People, The Journal of Applied Philosophy. Online early: doi: 10.1111/japp.12222.
  8. Mulgan, T. (2016b), Theorising about justice for a broken world, In K. Watene and J. Drydyk (eds.), Theorizing Justice: Critical Insights and Future Directions, London: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
  9. Mulgan, T. (2017). How should utilitarians think about the future?, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (2–3), 290–312.Google Scholar
  10. Putnam, R. (2010), American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us, Simon and Schuster: New York.Google Scholar
  11. Rawls, J. (1996), Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press: New York, expanded edition.Google Scholar
  12. Rawls, J. (1999a), A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press: United States of America, revised edition.Google Scholar
  13. Rawls, J. (1999b), The Law of Peoples, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations