Skip to main content

Enacting Community on Dartmoor: MED Theatre’s Badgerland: A Dartmoor Comedy (2015) and the Spatial Praxis of Community Performance Within a Conservation Zone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Histories of Cultural Participation, Values and Governance

Part of the book series: New Directions in Cultural Policy Research ((NDCPR))

  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter examines the emergence of a community-based theatre organisation on Dartmoor in response to post-war practices of conservation management of the National Park area located in the South-West of England. Noting the tension between the governmental construction of the Dartmoor landscape as ‘nature’ conserved for national prosperity and alternative (locally lived) understandings of the landscape as anthropic, Schaefer examines how a community-based theatre attends to Dartmoor as, primarily, a cultural and ecological landscape. The chapter locates the practices of MED Theatre, an inter-generational, educational and developmental theatre organisation on Dartmoor, in relation to other, relevant (influencing) models of collective creation: rural-touring community theatre (Kershaw in Theatre Quarterly 8: 65–91, 1978) and the community play (Jellicoe in Community Plays: How to Put Them On. Methuen, London, 1987). Drawing on a dynamic notion of community extrapolated from analysis of community arts (including community theatre) practice, the argument is made that MED Theatre’s work actively resists, or exceeds, socio-spatial containment by national park conservation management and instrumental cultural policy discourse. The chapter considers how recovery of the concepts of dynamic community and cultural democracy might re-animate fundamental political arguments for a democratic public policy in the UK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Community theatre was a part of the alternative theatre movement that emerged in the UK in the 1960s (see Kershaw 1991, 1992). Much of that ‘popular oppositional’ practice is now included within what is referred to as applied theatre and performance. In the USA, the term more commonly used is community-based theatre or community performance to differentiate it from amateur practice known as ‘community theatre’. In Australia, where I hail from, the term community arts or community cultural development includes community theatre, which is probably why I work across what are perhaps more separate fields of practice in the UK (see Jeffers and Moriarty 2017, 23).

  2. 2.

    The Shelton Trust was a national umbrella organisation for community artists formed in the 1980s after a re-structure of the Association for Community Artists devolved its operations to the regional level. As well as organising national conferences, the Shelton Trust published a regular magazine, Another Standard. The ‘Culture and Democracy Manifesto’ appeared in Another Standard in 1986 and was collectively authored by Trust members, including Owen Kelly (see Jeffers and Moriarty, 37).

  3. 3.

    For more information on Dartmoor National Park (including maps), see the Authority webpage: http://www.dartmoor.gov.uk/index.

  4. 4.

    See Schaefer et al. (2017) for a broader discussion of rurality and cultural participation.

  5. 5.

    Anthropologist, Kate Crehan, noted in Community Art: An Anthropological Perspective (2011) that academics have not studied the history of community arts, leaving main accounts of the practice to practitioners (p. 80). Happily, that situation is changing. Crehan’s text on seminal community arts organisation, Free Form, was quickly followed by a chapter on select community arts practices within Claire Bishop’s Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship (2012), Eugene van Erven’s Community Art Power: Essays from ICAF (2013a) and Community Arts Dialogues (2013b), Rimi Khan’s Art in Community: The Provisional Citizen (2015) and, recently, Jeffers and Moriarty’s Culture, Democracy and the Right to Make Art (2017) and François Matarasso’s A Restless Art: How Participation Won and Why It Matters (2019) (see https://arestlessart.com/).

  6. 6.

    In 1987, the Community Arts Board was reformed as the Community Cultural Development (CCD) Committee. See McEwen (2008) for an extended discussion of CCD’s close links with government policy.

  7. 7.

    Merli’s critique is in two parts: one problematises Matarasso’s lack of research methodology and the other is a moral/ethical critique related to the purported use of arts and culture to remediate the effects of social exclusion. It is this latter issue that I address here. For his own response, see Matarasso (2003).

  8. 8.

    Images of the original production are available here: http://www.medtheatre.themoon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Article-Badgers-and-the-Scottish-Referendum.pdf.

  9. 9.

    The popularity of the CTT community play model exceeded the bounds of the South-West of England. Kerhsaw notes that it even became possible to speak of an international community play movement (1992, 186). Claque Theatre (artistic director, Jon Oram) continues the CTT tradition of the community play. The community play is experiencing something of a practical and critical revival. See, for instance, Salford Community Theatre’s Love on the Dole and https://communitytheatreplaywright.wordpress.com/.

  10. 10.

    In addition to Beeson as Artistic Director, the company employs an Education team (Abby Stobart and Helen Gilbert), Company Development Officer (Gillian Webster) and an Artistic and Administrative Assistant (Suvi Rehell).

  11. 11.

    Rising Lights (5–7 years); Bright Lights (8–10 years); Bright Nights (10–12 years); and Wild Nights Young Company (13–19 years).

  12. 12.

    Cete refers to the group name for badgers. Badgers live in a sett. Their scientific (Latin) name is meles meles.

  13. 13.

    A fungus-like infection that can kill trees and shrubs, Phytophthora, presents a considerable threat to natural ecosystems and forest-based industries, see: http://www.dartmoor.gov.uk/lookingafter/laf-naturalenv/laf-treeswoodlands/laf_pram16710.

Bibliography

  • Adam, B., Beck, U., & Van Loon, J. (Eds.). (2000). The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London, Thousand Oaks, and Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, N. (2001). Things Can Only Get Better. Available online at: http://www.dartmoorsociety.com/files/debates/natpark.html#things%20better. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.

  • Beck, U. (1992). The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, Thousand Oaks, and Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M. (1991, March 28). A Superficial View of Landscape. The Independent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M. (1998). A Study of John Ford: John Ford and Dartmoor. Available online at: http://www.dartmoorresource.org.uk/performance/theatre-on-dartmoor/theatre-history-of/298-a-study-of-john-ford. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.

  • Beeson, M. (2013, February 22). Interviewed by: Schaefer, K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M. (2015). Badgers and the Scottish Referendum. Available online at: http://www.medtheatre.themoon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Article-Badgers-and-the-Scottish-Referendum.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2015.

  • Beeson, M., & Greeves, T. (1993). The Image of Dartmoor. Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, 125, 127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M., & Stobart, A. (2010, November 16). MED Theatre. Lecture and Workshop Presented at the University of Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. (2002). Art as a Means of Alleviating Social Exclusion: Does It Really Work? A Critique of Instrumental Cultural Policies and Social Impact Studies in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. (2006). The Social Impacts of the Arts—Myth or Reality? In M. Mirza (Ed.), Culture Vultures: Is UK Arts Policy Damaging the Arts? (pp. 20–37). London: Policy Exchange Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braden, S. (1978). Artists and People. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Community. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; London and New York: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crehan, K. (2011). Community Art: An Anthropological Perspective. Oxford and New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (2003). Community. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson, S. (2003). MED Theatre. Available online at: http://www.dartmoorresource.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=266. Accessed 16 May 2015.

  • Dilsaver, L. M., & Wyckoff, W. (2005). The Political Geography of National Parks. Pacific Historical Review, 74(2), 237–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dower, J. (1945). National Parks in England and Wales. London, UK: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Act. (1995). Chapter 25 Part III National Parks. Available online at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/25/part/III. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.

  • Ertürk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., Moran, M., & Williams, K. (2011). City State Against the National Settlement: UK Economic Policy and Politics After the Financial Crisis (Working Paper No. 101). University of Manchester: CRESC. Available online at: http://www.cresc.ac.uk/medialibrary/workingpapers/wp101.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2014.

  • Greeves, T. (2001). Twas Purty to Hear The Jumpers Going’—Dartmoor National Park: A Culture Misplaced. Available online at: http://www.dartmoorsociety.com/files/debates/natpark.html#purty. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.

  • Hawkins, G. (1993). From Nimbin to Mardi Gras: Constructing Community Arts. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, R. (1992). The Future of the Pastoral, Management of Public Access to the Heritage Landscape Architectural Heritage, No. 24 (pp. 49–54). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, T. B., & Everett, J. (2007). Resisting Rationalisation in the Natural and Academic Life-World: Critical Tourism Research or Hermeneutic Charity? In I. Ateljevic, A. Pritchard, & N. Morgan (Eds.), The Critical Turn in Tourism Studies: Innovative Research Methodologies (pp. 57–76). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, A., & Moriarty, G. (Eds.). (2017). Culture, Democracy and the Right to Make Art: The British Community Arts Movement. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellicoe, A. (1987). Community Plays: How to Put Them On. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R. (2015). Art in Community: The Provisional Citizen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, O. (1984). Community, Art and the State: Storming the Citadels. London: Comedia Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. (2014, July 3). What the 70s Can Tell Us About Culling Badgers. The Guardian. Available online at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jul/03/what-the-70s-can-tell-us-about-culling-badgers-gassing. Accessed 18 July 2016.

  • Kelly, M. (2015). Quartz and Feldspar: Dartmoor: A British Landscape in Modern Times. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, B. (1978). Theatre Art and Community Action: The Achievement of Medium Fair. Theatre Quarterly, 8(30), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, B. (1991). Theatre and Community: Alternative and Community Theatre in Britain: 1960–1985. An Investigation into Cultural History and Performance Efficacy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, B. (1992). The Politics of Performance: Radical Theatre as Cultural Intervention. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarasso, F. (1997). Use or Ornament: The Social Impact of Participation in the Arts. London: Comedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarasso, F. (2003). Smoke and Mirrors: A Response to Paola Merli’s “Evaluating the Social Impact of Participation in Arts Activities”, IJCP, 2002, vol. 8(1). International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9(3), 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarasso, F. (2019). A Restless Art: How Participation Won and Why It Matters. Lisbon and London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. https://arestlessart.com/.

  • McConachie, B. (2001). Approaching the “Structure of Feeling” in Grassroots Theater. In S. C. Haedicke & T. Nellhaus (Eds.), Performing Democracy: International Perspectives on Urban Community-Based Performance. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, C. (2008). Investing in Play: Expectations, Dependencies and Power in Australian Practices of Community Cultural Development. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • MED Theatre. (2015). Badgerland: A Dartmoor Comedy. Playscript. Available online at: http://www.medtheatre.themoon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Badgers-8.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2015.

  • Merli, P. (2002). Evaluating the Social Impact of Participation in Arts Activities: A Critical Review of François Matarasso’s Use or Ornament? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A. (2002). Re-imagining Cultural Studies: The Promise of Cultural Materialism. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirza, M. (Ed.). (2006). Culture Vultures: Is UK Arts Policy Damaging the Arts? London: Policy Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, M., & Smith, P. (2010). Art, Governance and the Turn to Community: Putting Art at the Heart of Local Government. Globalism Research Centre, RMIT University. Available online at: http://mams.rmit.edu.au/fc1d0uu0zhpm1.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2015.

  • National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 Chapter 97 12, 13, 14 Geo 6. Available online at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/12-13-14/97/enacted. Accessed 15 May 2015.

  • Pitts, G., and Watt, D. (2001). The Imaginary Conference. Artwork Magazine, Issue 50. Available online at: http://www.ccd.net/pdf/art50_imaginary_conference.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2015.

  • Rose, G. (1997a). Performing Inoperative Community: The Space and Resistance of Some Community Arts Projects. In S. Pile & M. Keith (Eds.), Geographies of Resistance (pp. 184–202). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (1997b). Spatialities of ‘Community’, Power and Change: The Imagined Geographies of Community Arts Projects. Cultural Studies, 11(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, K., Edwards, D., & Milling, J. (2017). Performing Moretonhampstead: Rurality, Participation and Cultural Value. Cultural Trends, 26(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Shelton Trust. (1986). Culture and Democracy: The Manifesto. London: Comedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Erven, E. (2013a). Community Art Power: Essays from ICAF 2011. Rotterdam: Rotterdams Wijktheater.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Erven, E. (2013b). Community Arts Dialogues. Utrecht: Treaty of Utrecht Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, D. (1991). Interrogating ‘Community’: Social Welfare Versus Cultural Democracy. In V. Binns (Ed.), Community and the Arts: History, Theory, Practice: Australian Perspectives (pp. 55–66). Leichhardt, NSW: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1958). Culture and Society. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1961). The Long Revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, D., MacDowell, L., & Mulligan, M. (2013). Critical Introduction: The Turn to Community in the Arts. Journal of Arts and Communities, 5(2–3), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerrie Schaefer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schaefer, K. (2019). Enacting Community on Dartmoor: MED Theatre’s Badgerland: A Dartmoor Comedy (2015) and the Spatial Praxis of Community Performance Within a Conservation Zone. In: Belfiore, E., Gibson, L. (eds) Histories of Cultural Participation, Values and Governance. New Directions in Cultural Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55027-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics