Skip to main content

A Brief History of Systemic Thought in the Social and Natural Sciences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complexity and Resilience in the Social and Ecological Sciences
  • 596 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a history and critique of mid-twentieth century general, and social systems theory. The history of systemic thought is familiar to most students of social science. What is less well integrated into current sociological theory and practice is the ‘second wave’ of systemic theory or ‘complexity theory’, which succeeded the general systems program. It beings with a critical re-evaluation of the legacies of ‘classical’ general systems theorists, and the early multidisciplinary promise of their work. Social systems theory emphasises the role of functional pre-requisites for social stability and reproduction, allied to a model of social structure often referred to as ‘structural functionalism’. The chapter concludes that the two tasks can productively be separated, and that there is nothing inherently conservative in specifying structural models as guiding ideal-types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The relative youth of sociology in comparison to that of the ‘mature’ physical sciences may account for the current ambiguity of its epistemology and subject matter – although the postmodern turn offers little evidence of a trajectory corresponding to that of Kuhn (Eliot and Kiel 2004; Harvey and Reed 2004). Conversely, others have suggested that it is possible for disciplines to experience periods of ‘non-paradigm, multi-paradigm, or dual paradigm activity’ (see Johnston and Sidaway 2004: 12).

  2. 2.

    A comprehensive, but disjointed history of this group, variously operating as the Committee on the Behavioral Sciences, the ‘Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences’ (under the auspices of the Ford Foundation (est. 1936), and the International Society for the Systems Sciences is offered in Debora Hammond’s (2003) The Science of Synthesis: Exploring the Social Implications of General Systems Theory. The political implications of post-war research funding, and the humanistic connotations of holistic conceptualisation are also addressed. The term General Systems Theory is credited to Ludwig Von Bertalanffy (1901–1972), whereas Living Systems Theory is credited to James Grier Miller’s (b1916) publication of the same name (1978). These terms are used interchangeably, as both approaches inform and complement each other, and the authors share common origins in the above groups – the term ‘systems theory’ is therefore an umbrella term for work within these traditions. The intricacies of these earlier debates and divergences are beyond the scope of this present discussion, and the reader is directed to Hammond (2003) and Skyttner (2005) for a comprehensive history.

  3. 3.

    Recent attempts to pointedly operationalise such measures of disorder include the analogical adoption of the concept of entropy (Miller and Miller 1992; Bailey 2006). The laws of the conservation of energy specify that closed systems, in their appropriation of energy, transform such energies into increasingly diffuse and less useful forms (Atkins 2007). A key principle of systems theory is that open living systems by necessity counteract this tendency by appropriating more energy from their environments, stored as surplus energy; degradation of structure is consequently conditional on this reverse process of negentropy. This level of analysis is clearly beyond the scope of conventional sociology, due to the impossible task of quantifying various social processes in terms of energy conservation.

  4. 4.

    Turner (1991) also offers a suitable summary of the pattern variable as an attempt to account for differing subjective orientations to action (1991: xxi). These variables were ultimately outlined by Parsons as a universal set, consisting of; affectivity vs. affective neutrality; self vs. collective orientation; universalism vs. particularism; achievement vs. ascription; specificity vs. diffuseness. As normative standards governing individual choice, the respective sets of pattern variables demonstrate similarities both to Tonnies’ distinction of gemeinschaft and gesellschaft (Turner 1991: xxi), and to the social contexts of Durkheim’s mechanical and organic solidarities.

References

  • Ashman, Keith M., and Philip S. Baringer, eds. 2001. After the Science Wars. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, Peter. 2007. Four Laws That Govern the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Kenneth. 1984. Beyond Functionalism: Towards a Nonequilibrium Analysis of Complex Social Systems. The British Journal of Sociology 35 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Kenneth D. 1994. Talcott Parsons, Social Entropy Theory, and Living Systems Theory. Behavioral Science 39 (1): 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Fifty Years of Systems Science: Further Reflections. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 22: 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Living Systems Theory and Social Entropy Theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23: 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Boundary Maintenance in Living Systems Theory and Social Entropy Theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 25: 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, John. 2007. Environment and Social Theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth. 1956. General Systems Theory – The Skeleton of Science. Management Science 3 (2): 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James, James Gillooly, Andrew Allen, Van Savage, and Geoffrey West. 2004. Toward a Metabolic Theory of Ecology. Ecology 85 (7): 1771–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Walter. 1967. Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, David. 1998. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, Brian, and Frederic William Hafferty. 2009. Sociology and Complexity Science: A New Field of Inquiry. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, Noel. 2002. False Antitheses? Marxism, Nature and Actor-Networks. Antipode 34 (1): 111–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, Noel, and Tom MacMillan. 2001. Dissolving Dualisms: Actor-Networks and the Reimagination of Nature. In Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics, ed. N. Castree and B. Braun, 208–224. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, Paul. 1998. Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, Robert, John H. Cumberland, Herman Daly, Robert Goodland, and Richard Norgaard. 1997. An Introduction to Ecological Economics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, Gerard. 2009. The Foundations of Social Theory. In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, ed. Brian Turner, 19–38. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, Peter. 1996. Reconstructing Nature: Alienation, Emancipation and the Division of Labour. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, Euel, and L. Douglas Kiel. 2004. Introduction. In Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications, ed. Douglas Kiel and Euel Elliot, 1–15. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, William R., Scott Frickel, and Robert Gramling. 1995. Beyond the Nature/Society Divide: Learning to Think About a Mountain. Sociological Forum 10 (3): 361–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, Judith. 1997. Beyond Dualism – The Social Construction of Nature and the Natural and Social Construction of Human Beings. Progress in Human Geography 21 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, Uta. 2002. Talcott Parsons: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A.D., and R.E. Fagen. 1956. Definition of System. General Systems 1: 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David L., and Michael Reed. 2004. Social Science as the Study of Complex Systems. In Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications, ed. L. Douglas Kiel and Euel Elliot, 295–323. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, Debora. 2003. The Science of Synthesis: Exploring the Social Implications of General Systems Theory. Boulder: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmwood, John. 2009. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Post-Parsonian Developments. In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, ed. B.S. Turner, 38–59. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Doyle Paul. 2008. Contemporary Sociological Theory: An Integrated Multi-level Approach. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.J., and J.D. Sidaway. 2004. Geography and Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography Since 1945. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, John H. 1999. Are There General Laws in Ecology? Oikos 84 (2): 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, Richard, and Richard Lewontin. 1985. The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manual-Navarrete, David. 2008. Approaches and Implications of Using Complexity Theory for Dealing with Social Systems. Complexity and Social Systems. http://research.yale.edu/CCR/environment/papers/manuel_complexity.pdf

  • Mazoyer, Marcel, and Laurence Roudart. 2006. A History of World Agriculture from the Neolithic Age to the Current Crisis. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, James Grier. 1955. Toward a General Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. The American Psychologist 10 (9): 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Jessie L., and James G. Miller. 1992. Greater than the Sum of Its Parts. Behavioural Science 37 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1954. Essays in Sociological Theory. Illinois: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Review: Concrete Systems and “Abstracted” Systems. Contemporary Sociology 8 (5): 696–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991 [1951]. The Social System. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, Keith R. 2001. Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Sociological Theory. American Journal of Sociology 107 (3): 551–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sciortino, Giuseppe. 2009. Functionalism and Social Systems Theory. In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, ed. B.S. Turner, 106–123. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyttner, Lars. 2005. General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, John, and Chris Jenks. 2006. Qualitative Complexity: Ecology, Cognitive Processes and the Re-emergence of Structures in Post-humanist Social Theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snooks, Graeme Donald. 2008. A General Theory of Complex Living Systems: Exploring the Demand Side of Dynamics. Complexity 13 (6): 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Brian. 1991. Preface to the New Edition of the Social System. In The Social System, ed. Talcott Parsons, xiii–xxxx. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, John. 2005. The Complexity Turn. Theory, Culture and Society 22 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadya, Andrew P. 1983. Progressive Contextualisation: Methods for Research in Human Ecology. Human Ecology 11 (3): 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Ruth, and Alison Wolf. 2006. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Flaherty, E. (2019). A Brief History of Systemic Thought in the Social and Natural Sciences. In: Complexity and Resilience in the Social and Ecological Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54978-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54978-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54977-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54978-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics