Advertisement

What Do You Mean When You Show and Say This? Where Does It Take You?

  • Lorenzo Natali
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology book series (PSGC)

Abstract

This chapter describes how coming into contact with the narratives of environmental victims—promoted by the use of photography—helps to develop different forms of reflexivity also useful for imagining and confronting the present environmental crisis. This challenge cannot really be undertaken without developing an active listening attitude towards the voices of lay people (“folk voices”), enhancing depth and complexity, visual imagination, the ability to dream, differently shaped ideas, new words and languages, and new ways of “taking care.”

Keywords

Case study Naturalistic generalization Folk green criminology Photo elicitation Photographic images 

Bibliography

  1. AA.VV. 2008. Una nuova rivista. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa 1(1): 3–8.Google Scholar
  2. Altopiedi, Rosalba. 2011. Un caso di criminalità d’impresa: l’Eternit di Casale Monferrato. Torino: L’Harmattan Italia.Google Scholar
  3. Angioni, Giulio. 2011. Fare, dire, sentire. L’identico e il diverso nelle culture. Nuoro: Il Maestrale.Google Scholar
  4. Auyero, Javier and Swistun, Déborah. 2009. Flammable. Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baxter, Jamie. 2010. Case Studies in Qualitative Research. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, ed. Iain Hay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, Ulrich. 2009 [2007]. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, Howard. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, Howard. 2014. What about Mozart? What about Murder? Reasoning from Cases. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, John. 1991 [1980]. About Looking. New York: Vintage International.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, Michelle. 2014. Visual Criminology and Carceral Studies: Counter-images in the Carceral Age. Theoretical Criminology 18: 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrabine, Eamonn. 2014. Seeing Things: Violence, Voyeurism and the Camera. Theoretical Criminology 18: 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrington, Kerry, Hogg, Russell and Sozzo, Máximo. 2016. Southern Criminology. The British Journal of Criminology 56: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, Stanley. 2001. States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Ellefsen, Rune, Sollund, Ragnhild and Larsen, Guri, eds. 2012. Eco-global Crimes: Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges. England: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Ferrell, Jeff, Hayward, Keith and Young, Jock. 2015. Cultural Criminology: An Invitation (2nd edn.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind. Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Book.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, Matthew. 2013b. Victims of Environmental Harm. Rights, Recognition and Redress under National and International Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Harper, Douglas. 2000. Reimagining Visual Methods. Galileo to Neuromancer. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn.), eds. Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Katz, Jack. 2001. From How to Why. On Luminous Description and Causal Inference in Ethnography (Part I). Ethnography 2(4): 443–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz, Jack. 2002. From How to Why. On Luminous Description and Causal Inference in Ethnography (Part 2). Ethnography 3(1): 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latour, Bruno. 2004 [1999]. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, Bruno. 2010 [2002]. The Making of Law–An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, Michael and Stretesky, Paul. 2003. The Meaning of Green. Theoretical Criminology 7(2): 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martínez Alier, Joan. 2003. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Melrose, Sherri. 2009. Naturalistic Generalization. In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, eds. Albert Mills, Gabrielle Durepos and Elden Wiebe. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Mol, Hanneke. 2013. ‘A Gift from the Tropics to the World’: Power, harm, and palm oil. In Emerging Issues in Green Criminology. Exploring Power, Justice and Harm, eds. Reece Walters, Diane Westerhuis and Tanya Wyatt. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Pauwels, Luc. 2009b. Street Discourse: A Visual Essay on Urban Signification. Culture Unbound 17: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pink, Sarah. 2001. Doing Visual Ethnography. Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Pink, Sarah. 2008. An Urban Tour. The Sensory Sociality of Ethnographic Place-making. Ethnography 9: 175–196.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandberg, Sveinung and Presser, Lois. 2015. Narrative Criminology: Understanding Stories of Crimes. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  32. Silverman, David. 2000. Analyzing Talk and Text. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, eds. Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Stake, Robert and Trumbull, Deborah. 1982. Naturalistic Generalization. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science 7: 1–12.Google Scholar
  34. Stake, Robert. 2000. Case Studies. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn.), eds. Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Szasz, Andrew. 1994. Ecopopulism. Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tombs, Steve. 2013. Trabajando para el mercado ‘libre’: complicidad estatal en la rutina del daño corporativo en el Reino Unido. Revista Crítica Penal y Poder 5: 266–290.Google Scholar
  37. Tombs, Steve and Whyte, David. 2015. The Corporate Criminal: Why Corporations Must Be Abolished. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Verde, Alfredo. 2008. Different Levels of Criminological Thinking. Popular Criminology, Institutional Criminology, ‘Scientific‘ Criminology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Reinvigorating Theory Through Diversity and Inclusiveness, St. Louis (USA), 12–15 November 2008.Google Scholar
  39. Verde, Alfredo. 2010. Il reale del delitto e i tre livelli della criminologia: criminologia folk, criminologia istituzionale, criminologia scientifica. In Narrative del male. Dalla fiction alla vita, dalla vita alla fiction, eds. Alfredo Verde and Cristiano Barbieri. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  40. Walters, Reece. 2010. Toxic Atmospheres Air Pollution, Trade and the Politics of Regulation. Critical Criminology 18: 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weisbrod, Carol. 1999. Fusion Folk: A Comment on Law and Music. Cardozo Law Review 20: 1439–1458.Google Scholar
  42. White, Rob. 2008. Crimes Against Nature: Environmental Criminology and Ecological Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. White, Rob. 2011. Transnational Environmental Crime: Toward an Eco-global Criminology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. White, Rob and Haines, Fiona. 2002. Crime and Criminology. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, Christopher. 1996. An Environmental Victimology. Social Justice 23: 16–40.Google Scholar
  46. Winchester, Hilary and Rofe, Matthew. 2010. Qualitative Research and Its Place in Human Geography. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, ed. Iain Hay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Natali
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations