Advertisement

Ways of Seeing the Elephant in the Room: Images and Words

  • Lorenzo Natali
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology book series (PSGC)

Abstract

In this chapter, I describe how photo elicitation can serve as a new source of qualitative data in environmental research and how it is crucial in promoting narratives about social perceptions of contamination. I also explain how photographs are decisive in becoming a reflexive and collaborative “bridge” between subjects and researchers. Furthermore, I suggest that this approach helps (1) to investigate the social perceptions of some transformations of the territory—often highly dramatic, as in the case of polluting plants built close to a town—introduced within a certain socio-environmental context in the course of time; and (2) to place these perceptions within the cultural, symbolical and natural worlds inhabited by the social actors, recognizing the active role of these actors in the construction of their unique experiences.

Keywords

Ways of seeing Photo elicitation Photographic collage Social perception Environmental victimization Qualitative data 

References

  1. Adam, Barbara. 1998. Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, Glenn. 2005. ‘Solastalgia’. A New Concept in Health and Identity. PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature 3: 41–55.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Altopiedi, Rosalba. 2011. Un caso di criminalità d’impresa: l’Eternit di Casale Monferrato. Torino: L’Harmattan Italia.Google Scholar
  4. Anzoise, Valentina and Mutti, Cristiano. 2013. Representing Perception. Integrating Photo Elicitation and Mental Maps in the Study of Urban Landscape. In Sociology of the Visual Sphere, eds. Regev Nathansohn and Dennis Zuev. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Athens, Lonnie. 2007. Radical Interactionism. Going Beyond Mead. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37(2): 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Auyero, Javier and Swistun, Déborah. 2008. The Social Production of Toxic Uncertainty. American Sociological Review 73(3): 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Auyero, Javier and Swistun, Déborah. 2009. Flammable. Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Banks, Marcus. 2007. Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barthes, Roland. 1978. Image-Music-Text. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
  10. Barthes, Roland. 2000 [1980]. Camera Lucida. Reflections on Photography. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Berger, John. 1991 [1980]. About Looking. New York: Vintage International.Google Scholar
  12. Bignante, Elisa. 2010. The Use of Photo-elicitation in Field Research. Exploring Maasai Representations and Use of Natural Resources. EchoGéo 11: 1–18.Google Scholar
  13. Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Brisman, Avi. 2009. It Takes Green to Be Green: Environmental Elitism, ‘Ritual Displays,’ and Conspicuous Non-Consumption. North Dakota Law Review 85(2): 329–370.Google Scholar
  15. Brisman, Avi and South, Nigel. 2014. Green Cultural Criminology. Constructions of Environmental Harm, Consumerism and Resistance to Ecocide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Calvino, Italo. 1988. Six Memos for the Next Millennium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ceretti, Adolfo and Natali, Lorenzo. 2009. Cosmologie violente. Percorsi di vite criminali. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, Stanley. 2001. States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  19. Collier, Malcolm. 2001. Approaches to Analysis in Visual Anthropology. In Handbook of Visual Analysis, eds. Theo van Leeuwen and Carey Jewitt. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, Pamela, Francis, Peter and Wyatt, Tanya, eds. 2014. Invisible Crimes and Social Harms. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrell, Jeff and Van de Voorde, Cécile. 2010. The Decisive Moment. Documentary Photography and Cultural Criminology. In Framing Crime. Cultural Criminology and the Image, eds. Keith Hayward and Mike Presdee. USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Frisina, Annalisa. 2013. Ricerca visuale e trasformazioni socio-culturali. Novara: UTET.Google Scholar
  23. Halsey, Mark. 2006. Deleuze and Environmental Damage: Violence of the Text. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Harcourt, Bernard. 2006. Language of the Gun. Youth, Crime and Public Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harper, Douglas. 1988. Visual Sociology: Expanding Sociological Vision. The American Sociologist 19(1): 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harper, Douglas. 2000. Reimagining Visual Methods. Galileo to Neuromancer. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn.), eds. Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Harper, Douglas. 2001. Changing Works: Visions of a Lost Agriculture. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harper, Douglas. 2002. Talking about Pictures: a Case for Photo Elicitation. Visual Studies 17(1): 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harper, Douglas. 2012. Visual Sociology. USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Heckenberg, Diane and White, Rob. 2013. Innovative Approaches to Researching Environmental Crime. In Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology, eds. Nigel South and Avi Brisman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Jiménez, Juan. 1957. Platero and I. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kearns, Robin. 2010. Seeing with Clarity: Undertaking Observational Research. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, ed. Iain Hay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Luque, Emilio. 2006. Mobilising Memories, Evidence and Futures: Disentangling Huelva from Chemical Industry. First draft discussion paper at ECPR Nicosia Joint Sessions 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
  34. Mead, George Herbert. 1963 [1934]. Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
  35. Melrose, Sherri. 2009. Naturalistic Generalization. In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, eds. Albert Mills, Gabrielle Durepos and Elden Wiebe. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Natali, Lorenzo. 2010. The Big Grey Elephants in the Backyard of Huelva. In Global Environmental Harm. Criminological Perspectives, ed. Rob White. Devon: Willan publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Parkin, Stephen. 2014. An Applied Visual Sociology: Picturing Harm Reduction. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. Parmeggiani, Paolo. 2006. Fotografare il territorio. Nuovi contributi della sociologia visuale. Udine: Quaderni del Dipartimento EST.Google Scholar
  39. Parmeggiani, Paolo. 2007. ‘Alas There Are Only Sixteen of Us Left’: Social Disintegration, Identity Transformation, and Visual Changes in a Rural Italian Village. In Framing Globalization: Visual Perspectives, eds. Patrizia Faccioli and Jacqueline Gibbons. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Pauwels, Luc. 2009a. Photo Essay: The Urban Canvas. Contexts 17: 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pauwels, Luc. 2009b. Street Discourse: A Visual Essay on Urban Signification. Culture Unbound 17: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pauwels, Luc. 2010. Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research. Sociological Methods & Research 38(4): 545–581.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pérez Cebada, Juan Diego. 2013. Energía y medio ambiente en la industrialización de Andalucía. In Industrialización y desarrollo económico en Andalucía. Un balance y nuevas aportaciones, ed. Andrés Sánchez Picón. Sevilla: Centro de Estudios Andaluces, Consejería de la Presidencia, Junta de Andalucía.Google Scholar
  44. Robins, Kevin. 1996. Into the Image: Culture and Politics in the Field of Vision. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rose, Gillian. 2012. Visual Methodologies. An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Rose, Gillian, Degen, Monica and Basdas, Begun. 2010. More on ‘Big Things’: Building Events and Feelings. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35: 334–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruiz-Ballesteros, Esteban, Valcuende, José Maria, Quintero, Victoria, Cortes, José Antonio and Rubio, Elena. 2009. Naturalizing the Environment. Perceptual Frames, Senses and Resistance. Journal of Material Culture 14(2): 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schept, Judah. 2014. (Un)seeing like a Prison: Counter-Visual Ethnography of the Carceral State. Theoretical Criminology 18: 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silverman, David. 2000. Analyzing Talk and Text. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, eds. Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, Eugene and Smith, Aileen. 1975. Minamata. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  51. Suchar, Charles. 1997. Grounding Visual Sociology Research in Shooting Scripts. Qualitative Sociology 20(1): 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Szasz, Andrew. 1994. Ecopopulism. Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tellechea Rodríguez, José Manuel. 2004. El Conflicto ‘Info-ambiental’: El Caso de Huelva Información (Agosto 1983–Diciembre 1992). Ambitos 11–12(1–2): 319–340.Google Scholar
  54. Todd, Zazie and Harrison, Simon. 2008. Metaphor Analysis. In Handbook of Emergent Methods, eds. Sharlene Hesse-Biber and Patricia Leavy. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  55. Van de Voorde, Cécile. 2012. Ethnographic Photography in Criminological Research. In The Sage Handbook of Criminological Research Methods, eds. David Gadd, Susanne Karstedt and Messner Steven. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Vassenden, Anders and Andersson, Mette. 2010. When an Image Becomes Sacred: Photo-Elicitation with Images of Holy Books. Visual Studies 25(2): 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waitt, Gordon. 2010. Doing Foucauldian Discourse Analysis–Revealing Social Realities. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, ed. Iain Hay. New York: Oxford University Press Oxford.Google Scholar
  58. Walters, Reece. 2010. Toxic Atmospheres Air Pollution, Trade and the Politics of Regulation. Critical Criminology 18: 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White, Rob. 2008. Crimes Against Nature: Environmental Criminology and Ecological Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. White, Rob. 2013a. Resource Extraction Leaves Something Behind: Environmental Justice and Mining. International Journal for Crime and Justice 2(1): 50–64.Google Scholar
  61. Williams, Christopher. 1996. An Environmental Victimology. Social Justice 23: 16–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Natali
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations