Advertisement

Green Criminology with Eyes Wide Open

  • Lorenzo Natali
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology book series (PSGC)

Abstract

The research questions of today’s green criminologists require a multiplicity of conceptual approaches and methods of inquiry. In this chapter, I share some reflections designed to open the way for new visual explorations of environmental harms and crimes from an emergent criminological perspective. This idea is profitably put in dialogue with what Avi Brisman and Nigel South, in recent contributions (e.g., 2013, 2014), conceptualize as a “green cultural criminology”—a criminological perspective that tries to imagine new modes of analysing critically the intersection of culture, crime, justice and environment.

Keywords

Green criminology Green cultural criminology Visual criminology Photo elicitation Visual methodologies 

References

  1. Anzoise, Valentina and Mutti, Cristiano. 2013. Representing Perception. Integrating Photo Elicitation and Mental Maps in the Study of Urban Landscape. In Sociology of the Visual Sphere, eds. Regev Nathansohn and Dennis Zuev. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Auyero, Javier and Swistun, Déborah. 2009. Flammable. Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, Howard. 1974. Photography and Sociology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 1: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, Howard. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You’re Doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beirne, Piers. 2015. Hogarth’s Art of Animal Cruelty. Satire, Suffering and Pictorial Propaganda. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, John. 2008 [1972]. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, John. 2013. Understanding a Photograph. London: Penguin Book.Google Scholar
  8. Bignante, Elisa. 2010. The Use of Photo-elicitation in Field Research. Exploring Maasai Representations and Use of Natural Resources. EchoGéo 11: 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Bollas, Christopher. 1993. Being a Character: Psychoanalysis and Self Experience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Brisman, Avi and South, Nigel. 2013a. Introduction. Horizons, Issues and Relationships in Green Criminology. In Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology, eds. Nigel South and Avi Brisman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Brisman, Avi and South, Nigel. 2013b. A Green-cultural Criminology: an Exploratory Outline. Crime Media Culture 9(2): 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brisman, Avi and South, Nigel. 2014. Green Cultural Criminology. Constructions of Environmental Harm, Consumerism and Resistance to Ecocide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Brisman, Avi and South, Nigel. 2015a. ‘Life Stage Dissolution’, Infantilization and Anti-social Consumption: Implications for De-responsibilization, Denial and Environmental Harm. Young – Nordic Journal of Youth Research 23(3): 209–221.Google Scholar
  15. Brisman, Avi, McClanahan, Bill and South, Nigel. 2014. Toward a Green-cultural Criminology of ‘the Rural’. Critical Criminology 22(4): 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brisman, Avi, and South, Nigel. 2012. Proposing a Green-Cultural Criminology: a New Perspective for 21st Century Criminology. In Ecological Crime and Environmental Protection—Multidisciplinary Perspectives, eds. Gorazd Meško, Andrej Sotlar and Katja Eman. Llubljana: Faculty of Criminal Justice, University of Maribor.Google Scholar
  17. Brisman, Avi, and South, Nigel. 2015b. New ‘Folk Devils’, Denials and Climate Change: Applying the Work of Stanley Cohen to Green Criminology and Environmental Harm. Critical Criminology, 23(4): 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brisman, Avi. 2012a. Coda: An Elevated Challenge to ‘Broken Windows’: The High Line (New York). Crime Media Culture 8(3): 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brisman, Avi. 2012b. The Cultural Silence of Climate Change Contrarianism. In Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective, ed. Rob White. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Brisman, Avi. 2014. Of Theory and Meaning in Green Criminology. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 3(2): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brisman, Avi. 2015a. Environment and Conflict: A Typology of Representations. In Environmental Crime and Social Conflict: Contemporary and Emerging Issues, eds. Avi Brisman, Nigel South and Rob White. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  22. Brisman, Avi. 2015b. ‘Multicolored’ Green Criminology and Climate Change’s Achromatopsia. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice 18(2): 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brisman, Avi. in press. Representations of Environmental Crime and Harm: A Green-Cultural Criminological Perspective on Human-Altered Landscapes. In Routledge International Handbook of Visual Criminology, eds. Michelle Brown and Eamonn Carrabine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Brown, Michelle. 2014. Visual Criminology and Carceral Studies: Counter-images in the Carceral Age. Theoretical Criminology 18: 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carrabine, Eamonn. 2011. The Iconography of Punishment: Execution Prints and the Death Penalty. The Howard Journal 50(5): 452–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chalfen, Richard. 2011. Looking Two Ways: Mapping the Social Scientific Study of Visual Culture. In The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, eds. Eric Margolis and Luc Pauwels. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Collier, John. 1967. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  28. Ferrell, Jeff and Van de Voorde, Cécile. 2010. The Decisive Moment. Documentary Photography and Cultural Criminology. In Framing Crime. Cultural Criminology and the Image, eds. Keith Hayward and Mike Presdee. USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Ferrell, Jeff, Hayward, Keith and Young, Jock. 2015. Cultural Criminology: An Invitation (2nd edn.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Ferrell, Jeff. 1998. Criminological Verstehen: Inside the Immediacy of Crime. In Ethnography at the Edge: Crime, Deviance and Field Research, eds. Jeff Ferrell and Mark Hamm. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ferrell, Jeff. 2001. Cultural Criminology. In The Sage Dictionary of Criminology, eds. Eugene McLaughlin and John Muncie. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Ferrell, Jeff. 2006. Empire of Scrounge: Inside the Urban Underground of Dumpster Diving, Trash Picking, and Street Scavenging. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ferrell, Jeff. 2013. Tangled Up in Green. Cultural Criminology and Green Criminology. In International Handbook of Green Criminology, eds. Nigel South and Avi Brisman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Gariglio, Luigi. 2015a. Etnografia, studi visuali e metodi visuali in criminologia. Un dialogo con Eamonn Carrabine e Ronnie Lippens sulla criminologia visuale. Studi culturali XII(1): 101–119.Google Scholar
  35. Gariglio, Luigi. 2015b. Photo-elicitation in Prison Ethnography: Breaking the Ice in the Field and Unpacking Prison Officers’ Use of Force. Crime Media Culture: 1–13. http://cmc.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/11/12/1741659015614223.full?citedby=yes&legid=spcmc;1741659015614223v1#cited-by.
  36. Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  37. Glaser, Barney and Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  38. Greek, Cecil. 2009. Documenting and Framing Police Public Interaction with Citizens: A Study in Visual Criminology. Criminal Justice Matters 78(1): 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Halsey, Mark. 2004. Against ‘Green’ Criminology. British Journal of Criminology 44(6): 833–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harper, Douglas. 2000. Reimagining Visual Methods. Galileo to Neuromancer. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn.), eds. Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Harper, Douglas. 2001. Changing Works: Visions of a Lost Agriculture. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Harper, Douglas. 2012. Visual Sociology. USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Hayward, Keith and Presdee, Mike, eds. 2010. Framing Crime. Cultural Criminology and the Image. USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Hayward, Keith. 2009. Visual Criminology: Cultural Criminology-style. Criminal Justice Matters 78(1): 12–14.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Heckenberg, Diane and White, Rob. 2013. Innovative Approaches to Researching Environmental Crime. In Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology, eds. Nigel South and Avi Brisman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Holm, Gunilla. 2008. Visual Research Methods. Where Are We and Where Are We Going? In Handbook of Emergent Methods, eds. Sharlene Hesse-Biber and Patricia Leavy. New York: The Guilford.Google Scholar
  47. Kane, Stephanie. 2004. The Unconventional Methods of Cultural Criminology. Theoretical Criminology 8(3): 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kohm, Steven and Greenhill, Pauline. 2013. ‘This is the North, Where We Do What We Want’. Popular Green Criminology and ‘Little Red Riding Hood’ Films. In Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology, eds. Nigel South and Avi Brisman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Kong, Taryn, Kellner, Klaus, Austin, Diane, Els, Yolandi and Orr, Barron. 2014. Enhancing Participatory Evaluation of Land Management through Photo Elicitation and Photovoice. Society & Natural Reources: an International Journal 28(2): 212–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lanzillo, Maria Laura. 2013. Presentazione. Governare la catastrofe fra scienze umane e scienze sociali. Governare la paura. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. Special Issue. Fear of Nature. The Government of Catastrophe between Human and Social Sciences, October: I–XIII. https://governarelapaura.unibo.it/article/view/4148/3582.
  52. Lapenta, Francesco. 2011. Some Theoretical and Methodological Views on Photo-Elicitation. In The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, eds. Eric Margolis and Luc Pauwels. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Latour, Bruno. 1993 [1991]. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Latour, Bruno. 2004 [1999]. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Lynch, Michael and Stretesky, Paul. 2003. The Meaning of Green. Theoretical Criminology 7(2): 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Natali, Lorenzo. 2013b. The Contemporary Horizon of Green Criminology. In International Handbook of Green Criminology, eds. Nigel South and Avi Brisman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Natali, Lorenzo. 2015a. Green criminology. Prospettive emergenti sui crimini ambientali. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  58. Ortega y Gasset, José. 2011 [1939]. Meditazione sulla tecnica e altri saggi su scienza e filosofia. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  59. Pauwels, Luc. 2009b. Street Discourse: A Visual Essay on Urban Signification. Culture Unbound 17: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pauwels, Luc. 2011. An Integrated Conceptual Framework for Visual Social Research. In The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, eds. Eric Margolis and Luc Pauwels. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Pauwels, Luc. 2012. A Multimodal Framework for Analysing Website as Cultural Expressions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17: 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pauwels, Luc. 2015. Reframing Visual Social Science. Towards a More Visual Sociology and Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pink, Sarah. 2001. Doing Visual Ethnography. Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Pink, Sarah. 2008. An Urban Tour. The Sensory Sociality of Ethnographic Place-making. Ethnography 9: 175–196.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rafter, Nicole. 2014. Introduction to Special Issue on Visual Culture and the Iconography of Crime and Punishment. Theoretical Criminology 18: 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robins, Kevin. 1996. Into the Image: Culture and Politics in the Field of Vision. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rose, Gillian. 2012. Visual Methodologies. An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Ruggiero, Vincenzo and South, Nigel. 2013. Green Criminology and Crimes of the Economy: Theory, Research and Praxis. Critical Criminology 21(3): 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schept, Judah. 2014. (Un)seeing like a Prison: Counter-Visual Ethnography of the Carceral State. Theoretical Criminology 18: 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Settis, Salvatore. 2010. Paesaggio Costituzione Cemento. La battaglia per l’ambiente contro il degrado civile. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  71. Sollund, Ragnhild. 2012. Introduction. In Eco-global Crimes: Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges, eds. Rune Ellefsen, Ragnhild Sollund and Guri Larsen. England: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. South, Nigel, Brisman, Avi and Beirne, Piers. 2013. A Guide to a Green Criminology. In Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology, eds. Nigel South and Avi Brisman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. South, Nigel. 1998. A Green Field for Criminology? A Proposal for a Perspective. Theoretical Criminology 2(2): 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. South, Nigel. 2014. Green Criminology: Reflections, Connections, Horizons. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 3(2): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Szasz, Andrew. 1994. Ecopopulism. Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  76. Van de Voorde, Cécile. 2012. Ethnographic Photography in Criminological Research. In The Sage Handbook of Criminological Research Methods, eds. David Gadd, Susanne Karstedt and Messner Steven. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Waitt, Gordon. 2010. Doing Foucauldian Discourse Analysis–Revealing Social Realities. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, ed. Iain Hay. New York: Oxford University Press Oxford.Google Scholar
  78. Walters, Reece. 2010. Toxic Atmospheres Air Pollution, Trade and the Politics of Regulation. Critical Criminology 18: 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. White, Rob and Haines, Fiona. 2002. Crime and Criminology. An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. White, Rob and Heckenberg, Diane. 2014. Green Criminology. An Introduction to the Study of Environmental Harm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. White, Rob. 2003. Environmental Issues and the Criminological Imagination. Theoretical Criminology 7: 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. White, Rob. 2008. Crimes Against Nature: Environmental Criminology and Ecological Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. White, Rob. 2011. Transnational Environmental Crime: Toward an Eco-global Criminology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. White, Rob. 2013b. The Conceptual Contours of Green Criminology. In Emerging Issues in Green Criminology. Exploring Power, Justice and Harm, eds. Reece Walters, Diane Westerhuis and Tanya Wyatt. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Natali
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations