Skip to main content

Situated Perspectives on the Global Fight Against Torture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reflexivity and Criminal Justice

Abstract

The contemporary global struggle against torture began in 1973 at a conference organised by Amnesty International. Almost a decade later the organisation now known as DIGNITY—Danish Institute Against Torture was founded as the first Centre set up to treat and rehabilitate victims of torture. This chapter builds on interviews with six members of DIGNITY staff. Their narratives draw on a rich and multi-textured set of experiences working to prevent torture in various parts of the world. The chapter does not endeavour to paint an organisational history. Rather, the aim is more modest, namely to draw out some central pivotal themes and consider the relationship between personal and institutional reflexivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the first version of this paper some space was given over to consideration of an additional theme, namely whether there is a price to pay for individuals engaged in anti-torture work. The consensus was basically that costs, if existent were minimal or worth it and could not be compared to the price paid by activists on the front-line. Despite what seemed like a reasonable hypothesis to me—that the fight against torture might leave its warriors marked in some way—interviewees were having none, or very little, of this.

  2. 2.

    Janis and Noyes (2006) quote, for example, a much-cited appeals court judgement (in the case of Filartiga v. Pena-Irala) which stated how ‘the torturer has become, like the pirate and the slave trader before him, hostis humani generis, an enemy of all mankind.’ Further, Peter Kooijmans, the special rapporteur on torture writing in 1986 put it this way: ‘Torture is now absolutely and without any reservation prohibited under international law whether in time of peace or war. In all human rights instruments the prohibition of torture belongs to the group of rights from which no derogation can be made… If ever a phenomenon was outlawed unreservedly and unequivocally it is torture.’ (Kooijmans 1986).

References

  • Allen, John (2011) ‘Powerful Assemblages?’, Area Vol. 43(2): 154–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning, V. (2016) ‘Unsilencing Sexual Torture: Responses to Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Denmark’, British Journal of Criminology 6 (3): 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think, New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. and Williams, E. M. (2005) ‘Bourdieu and Social Work’, Social Service Review vol. 79(4): 689–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. and Lave, J. (2001) History in Person. Enduring Struggles, Contentious Practice, Intimate Identities, Santa Fe, NM/Oxford: SAR Press, James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, M. and Noyes, J. (2006) International Law: Cases and Commentary, 3rd edn., New York: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. (2014) The Situated Production of Legitimacy: Perspectives from the Global South. In J. Tankebe and A. Liebling (Eds.) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. and Gaborit, L. S. (2015) Human Rights in Prisons: Comparing Institutional Encounters in Kosovo, Sierra Leone and the Philippines, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. and Huniche, L. (2009) ‘(Re)Searching for Persons in Practice: Field- Based Methods for Critical Psychological Practice Research’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 6 (1 and 2): 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T., Jensen, S., Anderson, M. K., Christiansen, C., Sharma, J. R. (forthcoming) ‘Torture and Ill-treatment Under Perceived Human Rights Documentation and the Poor’, Human Rights Quarterly (accepted 18 March 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooijmans, P. (1986) Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Research Report, UN Special Rapporteur UN DOC E/CN.4/1986/15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (2011) Apprenticeship in Critical Ethnographic Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jefferson, A.M. (2017). Situated Perspectives on the Global Fight Against Torture. In: Armstrong, S., Blaustein, J., Henry, A. (eds) Reflexivity and Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54641-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54642-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics