Conclusion

  • Sharon Pinkney
Chapter

Abstract

The concluding chapter reviews the way this book aims to make a contribution to reflections on what child-centred practice means in child welfare. With a theoretical framework informed by insights from a number of disciplinary perspectives, the book pays particular attention to psychosocial, emotional, sensory and spatial influences. The book uses case studies to reflect on the contemporary landscape of children’s services within the UK. It sets out the way policy establishes a complex terrain for contemporary child welfare practice. The argument is that there are no simple answers to the problems faced by society in relation to protecting and safeguarding children and young people. The book provides some examples of good practice in difficult and challenging work with children and young people.

References

  1. Butler-Sloss, E. (1988). Report of the inquiry into child abuse in Cleveland 1987. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  2. Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jay, A. (2014). Independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, 1997–2013. Rotherham: Rotherham MBC.Google Scholar
  4. Kelly, L., Radford, J., & Hester, M. (1996). Women, violence and male power: Feminist activism, research and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Laming, H. (2003). The Victoria Climbié inquiry: Report of an inquiry. Department of Health. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. London Borough of Brent. (1985). A child in trust: The report of the panel of inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death of Jasmine Beckford. Presented to Brent Borough Council and to Brent Health Authority by the members of the panel of inquiry. Louis Blom-Cooper (chair). London: London Borough of Brent.Google Scholar
  7. Mica Nava, A. (1988). Cleveland and the press: Outrage and anxiety in the reporting of child sexual abuse. Feminist Review, 28(1), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Munro, E. (2011a). The Munro review of child protection. Interim report: The child’s journey. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  9. Munro, E. (2011b). The Munro review of child protection. Final report: A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  10. Parton, N. (2016). The contemporary politics of child protection: Part two (The BASPCAN Founder’s lecture 2015). Child Abuse Review, 25(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
  11. Pinkney, S. (2005). Competing constructions of children’s participation in social care: Analysing text and talk. PhD thesis, British Library EThOS.Google Scholar
  12. Pinkney, S. (2011a). Participation and emotions: Troubling encounters between children and social welfare professionals. Children & Society, 25(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pinkney, S. (2011b). Discourses of children’s participation: Professionals, policies and practices. Social Policy & Society, 10(3), 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. The Children’s Commission. (2015). Barnahus – Improving the response to child sexual abuse in England. London: Children’s Commissioner for EnglandGoogle Scholar
  15. Winter, K. (2009). Relationships matter: The problems and prospects for social workers’ relationships with young children in care. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Pinkney
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie School of EducationLeeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations