Skip to main content

Trust in Relations Between Children and Social Welfare Professionals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Directions in Children’s Welfare
  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to discover the delicate dynamics of trust within the specific professional and service user relations in work with children and young people who are either Looked After or at risk of significant harm. The issue of time to work with children directly and the importance of continuity of relationships between the child and professional are emphasised. The chapter considers institutional trust and mistrust, the wider issues of trust within the broader context of societal attitudes towards children and young people. This level of analysis takes us into the arena of children’s rights and social justice. The chapter aims to rethink child protection through the lens of relations of trust between children, young people and the professionals who support and protect them.

This chapter draws on and develops further some of the arguments in the chapter: Pinkney, S (2013). Trust relationships between children, social welfare professionals and the organisations of welfare. In Hanne Warming (Ed) Participation, Citizenship and Trust in Children’s Lives, Palgrave Macmillan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson, J., & Templeton, L. (2012). Silent voices: Supporting children and young people affected by parental alcohol misuse. London: OCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldgate, J., Healy, L., Malcolm, B., Pine, B., Rose, W., & Seden, W. (Eds.). (2007). Enhancing social work management: Theory and best practice from the UK and USA. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1990). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., Hill, R., & Watts, R. (Eds.). (2005). Violations of trust: How social and welfare institutions fail children and young people. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. G. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford Safeguarding Children Board. (2013, November). Serious case review, Hamzah Khan. The overview report. http://www.bradford-scb.org.uk/scr/hamzah_khan_scr/Serious%20Case%20Reveiw%20Overview%20Report%20November%202013.pdf. Accessed 05 Jan 2017.

  • Churchill, H. (2013). Retrenchment and restructuring: Family support and children’s services reform under the coalition. Journal of Children’s Services, 8(3), 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2000). Reinventing the welfare state. In J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz, & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), New managerialism new welfare? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E., & Westmarland, L. (2007). Creating citizen-consumers: Changing publics and changing public-services. London/New Delhi: Sage/Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. (2014). Children should be seen and heard: Understanding the child’s experience. In M. Blyth (Ed.), Moving on from Munro: Improving children’s services. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2011). ‘Don’t make assumptions’: Children and young people’s views of the child protection system and messages for change. Office of the Children’s Commissioner, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2009). ‘Be quiet and listen’: Emotion, public policy and social totality. In S. D. Sclater, D. W. Jones, H. Price, & C. Yates (Eds.), Emotion: New psychosocial perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossar, J., Brandon, M., Bailey, S., Belderson, P., Biggart, L., & Sharpe, D. (2013). ‘It takes a lot to trust’. Recognition and telling: Developing earlier routes to help for children and young people. London: OCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2016). ‘You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you’: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (1989). An introduction to the children act 1989. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (1991). Children in the public care: A review of residential care carried out by Sir William Utting. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2003). The green paper: Every child matters. Norwich: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. Oxen: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger (2nd ed.). Oxon/New York: Routledge Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, H. (2004). Protecting children in time: Child abuse, child protection and the promotion of welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Froggett, L. (2002). Love, hate and welfare: Psychosocial approaches to policy and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Oxford: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J. (Ed.). (2016). The sociology of time. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, L., & Stein, M. (2015). Understanding and working with adolescent neglect: Perspectives from research, young people and professionals. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. M Government. (2015). Working together to safeguard children: A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., & Myers, J. (1997). The future detection and prevention of institutional abuse: Giving children a chance to participate in research. Early Childhood Development and Care, 113, 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, A. (2014). Independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, 1997–2013. Rotherham: Rotherham MBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laming, H. (2003). The Victoria Climbié inquiry: Report of an inquiry. Department of Health. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (2007). Consistent care matters: Exploring the potential of social work practices. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainey, A., Ellis, A., & Lewis, J. (2009). Children’s views of services: A rapid review. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, G. (2004). Social policy and discourse analysis: Policy change in public housing. Aldershot/Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, A. J. (2000). Listening but not hearing: Barriers to effective communication between young people in public care and their social workers. PhD Thesis, University of Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, A. (2007). Whose agenda? Issues of power and relationship when listening to looked-after young people. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. A. (2001). Normality and trust in Goffman’s theory of interaction order. Sociological Theory, 19(3), 312–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S., & Wheatley, H. (1994). Time to listen: The experiences of young people in foster and residential care. London: ChildLine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D. (2006). Gender, space and time: Women and higher education. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2011a). The Munro review of child protection. Interim report: The child’s journey. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2011b). The Munro review of child protection. Final report: A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (1998). Managerialism and social welfare. In G. Hughes & G. Lewis (Eds.), Unsettling welfare: The reconstruction of social policy. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley, A. (2000). Listening to children’s views: The findings and recommendations of recent research. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, S. (1998). The reshaping of social work and social care. In G. Hughes & G. Lewis (Eds.), Unsettling welfare: The reconstruction of social policy. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, S. (2005). Competing constructions of children’s participation in social care: Analysing text and talk. PhD thesis, British Library EThOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, S. (2011a). Participation and emotions: Troubling encounters between children and social welfare professionals. Children & Society, 25(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, S. (2011b). Discourses of children’s participation: Professionals, policies and practices. Social Policy & Society, 10(3), 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, S. (2013). Trust relationships between children, social welfare professionals and the organisations of welfare. In H. Warming (Ed.), Participation, citizenship and trust in children’s lives. Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pithouse, A. (1996). Managing emotion: Dilemmas in the social work relationship. In K. Carter & S. Delamont (Eds.), Qualitative research: The emotional dimension. Avebury/Aldershot: Brookfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, L. (1960). In defense of social work: An examination of stress in the profession. Social Service Review, 1, 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, T. (2013). ‘We are all in this together’? The hidden costs of poverty, recession and austerity policies on Britain’s poorest children. Children & Society, 27(5), 406–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, J., Larkins, C., Farrelly, N., Hussein, S., Austerberry, H., Manthorpe, J., & Stanley, N. (2016). Investing in the relationship: Practitioners’ relationships with looked-after children and care leavers in social work practices. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rustin, M. (2005). Conceptual analysis of critical moments in Victoria Climbié’s life. Child and Family Social Work, 10, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyamurti, C. (1981). Occupational survival: The case of the local authority social worker. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, G., & Thoburn, J. (1996). Child protection: The voice of the child in decision making. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, R. (1998). Involving children in planning their care. Child and Family Social Work, 3(2), 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., & Neale, B. (2000). ‘It’s my life too’- children’s perspectives on post-divorce parenting. Family Law, 30, 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N., & O’Kane, C. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children. Children and Society, 12(5), 336–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warming, H. (Ed.). (2013). Participation, citizenship and trust in children’s lives. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, K. (2009). Relationships matter: The problems and prospects for social workers’ relationships with young children in care. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pinkney, S. (2018). Trust in Relations Between Children and Social Welfare Professionals. In: New Directions in Children’s Welfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54539-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54539-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54538-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54539-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics