Trust in Relations Between Children and Social Welfare Professionals

  • Sharon Pinkney
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter aims to discover the delicate dynamics of trust within the specific professional and service user relations in work with children and young people who are either Looked After or at risk of significant harm. The issue of time to work with children directly and the importance of continuity of relationships between the child and professional are emphasised. The chapter considers institutional trust and mistrust, the wider issues of trust within the broader context of societal attitudes towards children and young people. This level of analysis takes us into the arena of children’s rights and social justice. The chapter aims to rethink child protection through the lens of relations of trust between children, young people and the professionals who support and protect them.

Keywords

Trust Child-centred practice Relationship-centred practice 

References

  1. Adamson, J., & Templeton, L. (2012). Silent voices: Supporting children and young people affected by parental alcohol misuse. London: OCC.Google Scholar
  2. Aldgate, J., Healy, L., Malcolm, B., Pine, B., Rose, W., & Seden, W. (Eds.). (2007). Enhancing social work management: Theory and best practice from the UK and USA. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1990). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bessant, J., Hill, R., & Watts, R. (Eds.). (2005). Violations of trust: How social and welfare institutions fail children and young people. Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. G. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford Safeguarding Children Board. (2013, November). Serious case review, Hamzah Khan. The overview report. http://www.bradford-scb.org.uk/scr/hamzah_khan_scr/Serious%20Case%20Reveiw%20Overview%20Report%20November%202013.pdf. Accessed 05 Jan 2017.
  8. Churchill, H. (2013). Retrenchment and restructuring: Family support and children’s services reform under the coalition. Journal of Children’s Services, 8(3), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2000). Reinventing the welfare state. In J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz, & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), New managerialism new welfare? London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E., & Westmarland, L. (2007). Creating citizen-consumers: Changing publics and changing public-services. London/New Delhi: Sage/Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  12. Clifton, J. (2014). Children should be seen and heard: Understanding the child’s experience. In M. Blyth (Ed.), Moving on from Munro: Improving children’s services. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2011). ‘Don’t make assumptions’: Children and young people’s views of the child protection system and messages for change. Office of the Children’s Commissioner, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, A. (2009). ‘Be quiet and listen’: Emotion, public policy and social totality. In S. D. Sclater, D. W. Jones, H. Price, & C. Yates (Eds.), Emotion: New psychosocial perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Cossar, J., Brandon, M., Bailey, S., Belderson, P., Biggart, L., & Sharpe, D. (2013). ‘It takes a lot to trust’. Recognition and telling: Developing earlier routes to help for children and young people. London: OCC.Google Scholar
  16. Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2016). ‘You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you’: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Department of Health. (1989). An introduction to the children act 1989. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  18. Department of Health. (1991). Children in the public care: A review of residential care carried out by Sir William Utting. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  19. Department of Health. (2003). The green paper: Every child matters. Norwich: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  20. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. Oxen: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger (2nd ed.). Oxon/New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  22. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferguson, H. (2004). Protecting children in time: Child abuse, child protection and the promotion of welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Froggett, L. (2002). Love, hate and welfare: Psychosocial approaches to policy and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Oxford: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  28. Hassard, J. (Ed.). (2016). The sociology of time. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Hicks, L., & Stein, M. (2015). Understanding and working with adolescent neglect: Perspectives from research, young people and professionals. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. H. M Government. (2015). Working together to safeguard children: A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, J., & Myers, J. (1997). The future detection and prevention of institutional abuse: Giving children a chance to participate in research. Early Childhood Development and Care, 113, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jay, A. (2014). Independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, 1997–2013. Rotherham: Rotherham MBC.Google Scholar
  33. Laming, H. (2003). The Victoria Climbié inquiry: Report of an inquiry. Department of Health. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  34. Le Grand, J. (2007). Consistent care matters: Exploring the potential of social work practices. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  35. Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Mainey, A., Ellis, A., & Lewis, J. (2009). Children’s views of services: A rapid review. London: National Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
  37. Marston, G. (2004). Social policy and discourse analysis: Policy change in public housing. Aldershot/Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. McLeod, A. J. (2000). Listening but not hearing: Barriers to effective communication between young people in public care and their social workers. PhD Thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
  39. McLeod, A. (2007). Whose agenda? Issues of power and relationship when listening to looked-after young people. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Misztal, B. A. (2001). Normality and trust in Goffman’s theory of interaction order. Sociological Theory, 19(3), 312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morris, S., & Wheatley, H. (1994). Time to listen: The experiences of young people in foster and residential care. London: ChildLine.Google Scholar
  42. Moss, D. (2006). Gender, space and time: Women and higher education. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  43. Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Munro, E. (2011a). The Munro review of child protection. Interim report: The child’s journey. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  45. Munro, E. (2011b). The Munro review of child protection. Final report: A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  46. Newman, J. (1998). Managerialism and social welfare. In G. Hughes & G. Lewis (Eds.), Unsettling welfare: The reconstruction of social policy. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. O’Quigley, A. (2000). Listening to children’s views: The findings and recommendations of recent research. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  48. Pinkney, S. (1998). The reshaping of social work and social care. In G. Hughes & G. Lewis (Eds.), Unsettling welfare: The reconstruction of social policy. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Pinkney, S. (2005). Competing constructions of children’s participation in social care: Analysing text and talk. PhD thesis, British Library EThOS.Google Scholar
  50. Pinkney, S. (2011a). Participation and emotions: Troubling encounters between children and social welfare professionals. Children & Society, 25(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pinkney, S. (2011b). Discourses of children’s participation: Professionals, policies and practices. Social Policy & Society, 10(3), 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pinkney, S. (2013). Trust relationships between children, social welfare professionals and the organisations of welfare. In H. Warming (Ed.), Participation, citizenship and trust in children’s lives. Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Pithouse, A. (1996). Managing emotion: Dilemmas in the social work relationship. In K. Carter & S. Delamont (Eds.), Qualitative research: The emotional dimension. Avebury/Aldershot: Brookfield.Google Scholar
  54. Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rapoport, L. (1960). In defense of social work: An examination of stress in the profession. Social Service Review, 1, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ridge, T. (2013). ‘We are all in this together’? The hidden costs of poverty, recession and austerity policies on Britain’s poorest children. Children & Society, 27(5), 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ridley, J., Larkins, C., Farrelly, N., Hussein, S., Austerberry, H., Manthorpe, J., & Stanley, N. (2016). Investing in the relationship: Practitioners’ relationships with looked-after children and care leavers in social work practices. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rustin, M. (2005). Conceptual analysis of critical moments in Victoria Climbié’s life. Child and Family Social Work, 10, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Satyamurti, C. (1981). Occupational survival: The case of the local authority social worker. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Schofield, G., & Thoburn, J. (1996). Child protection: The voice of the child in decision making. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  62. Sinclair, R. (1998). Involving children in planning their care. Child and Family Social Work, 3(2), 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smart, C., & Neale, B. (2000). ‘It’s my life too’- children’s perspectives on post-divorce parenting. Family Law, 30, 163–169.Google Scholar
  64. Thomas, N., & O’Kane, C. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children. Children and Society, 12(5), 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Warming, H. (Ed.). (2013). Participation, citizenship and trust in children’s lives. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. Winter, K. (2009). Relationships matter: The problems and prospects for social workers’ relationships with young children in care. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Pinkney
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie School of EducationLeeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations