Skip to main content

Ethics, Representations and Judgement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 548 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting ((PSIS))

Abstract

Maras considers the implications of thinking about ethics in screenwriting from the point of view of the analyst or critic making ethical judgements. He argues that the role of the critic is more than dispensing moral judgements about what is right and wrong. Ethical analysis brings with it a responsibility to be cognizant of what we mean by ‘good’ and ‘bad’. The chapter surveys the broader links between storytelling and ethics. Drawing on the theory of ‘world projection’ put forward by American philosopher Nicholas Wolterstorff, and applying it to Jimmy McGovern’s 2014 script for Common, the chapter illustrates how a script can be said to do ’ethical work’, and suggests that ethical work should play an important part when making judgements about films and scripts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1992. Illuminations. Translated by Harry Zohn. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Wayne C. 1988. The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Stephen. 2004. The Nature of Moral Reasoning: The Framework and Activities of Ethical Deliberation, Argument and Decision-Making. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, John, and John Hartley. 2003. Reading Television. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, Adam. 2012. ‘“Leaping Broken Narration”: Ballads, Oral Storytelling and the Cinema.’ In Storytelling in World Cinemas, Volume One: Forms, edited by Lina Khatib, 71–88. New York: Wallflower Press/Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, Jennifer L. 2012. ‘Ghosts in the National Machine: The Haunting (and Taunting) Films of Tracey Moffatt.’ In Storytelling in World Cinemas, Volume One: Forms, edited by Lina Khatib, 177–91. New York: Wallflower Press/Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, George. 1973. ‘Teacher Image in Mass Culture: Symbolic Functions of the “Hidden Curriculum”.’ In Communication Technology and Social Policy, edited by George Gerbner, Larry P. Gross and William H. Melody, 265–68. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Larry. 2014. ‘“The Watergate Theory of Screenwriting”: a keynote presentation at SRN, Wisconsin, 2013.’ Journal of Screenwriting 5 (3): 313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamelink, Cees J. 2014. ‘Communication Rights and the History of Ideas.’ In Communication Rights and Social Justice Historical Accounts of Transnational Mobilizations, edited by Claudia Padovani and Andrew Calabrese, 17–28. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamelink, Cees J., and Julia Hoffmann. 2008. ‘The State of the Right to Communicate.’ Global Media Journal (American Edition) 7 (13). http://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/the-state-of-the-right-to-communicate.pdf

  • International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems. 1980. Many Voices, One World: Towards A New More Just and More Efficient World Information and Communication Order. London, New York: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, Hester. 2013. ‘Taonga (Cultural Treasures): Reflections on Maori Storytelling in the Cinema of Aotearoa/New Zealand.’ In Storytelling in World Cinemas, Volume Two: Contexts, edited by Lina Khatib, 21–34. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Joe. 2013. Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives, Creating Community. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, Edmund. 1976. Culture and Communication: The Logic by which Symbols are Connected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Philip. 2004. ‘The Right to Communicate Affirms and Restores Human Dignity.’ http://www.direitoacomunicacao.org.br/index2.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=130&Itemid=99999999

  • Maras, Steven. 2009. Screenwriting: History, Theory and Practice. London: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern. Jimmy. 2014. Common [Script]. http://www.bbc.co.uk/writersroom/scripts/common

  • Mehring, Margaret. 1990. The Screenplay: A Blend of Film Form and Content. Boston: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2004. Being Yourself: Essays on Identity, Action and Social Life. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Pat P. 1986. Script Supervising and Film Continuity. Boston: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannicelli, Ted. 2011. ‘Why Can’t Screenplays Be Artworks?’ The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (4): 405–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, Horace and Paul M. Hirsch. 1994. ‘Television as a Cultural Forum.’ In Television: The Critical View, edited by Horace Newcomb, 561–573. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring, a Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha Craven. 1983. ‘Flawed Crystals: James’s The Golden Bowl and Literature as Moral Philosophy.’ New Literary History 15 (1): 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha Craven. 1995. Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha Craven. 1997. Cultivating humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Carl R. 1987. ‘Defining Documentary: Fiction, Nonfiction, and Projected Worlds.’ Persistence of Vision 5 (Spring): 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Carl R. 1997. Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D. D. 1983. ‘Can Literature Be Moral Philosophy?’ New Literary History 15 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, Ellie, Leo Berkeley, and Blaise Murphet. 2010. ‘Community Media and Ethical Choice.’ 3CMedia 6: 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, Jane. 2008. Pulling Focus: Intersubjective Experience, Narrative Film, and Ethics. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1994. ‘The Politics of Recognition.’ In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, edited by Amy Gutmann, 25–73. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Graeme. 2002. Film as Social Practice. 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherell, Carol S. 1991. ‘Narrative and the Moral Realm: Tales of Caring and Justice.’ Journal of Moral Education 20 (3): 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1976. ‘Worlds of Works of Art.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (2): 121–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1980. Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Film and Television References

  • Common. 2014. Cr: Jimmy McGovern; Dir: David Blair, BBC1, UK, 90 mins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Maras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maras, S. (2016). Ethics, Representations and Judgement. In: Maras, S. (eds) Ethics in Screenwriting. Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54493-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics