Abstract
-
Policy guidance has often focused on the need for strong partnerships between parents/carers and practitioners to support the learning of children labelled with Special Educational Needs and/or Disabilities (SEND).
-
Despite this policy focus, relationships between parents/carers and practitioners are often difficult.
-
This chapter explores the nature of these difficulties drawing on the work of Lipsky (1971) and McKenzie and Scully (2007).
-
In conclusion, there are suggestions for how partnership working between parents/carers, practitioners and children might be developed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashworth, P. D. (2016). The Lifeworld – Enriching Qualitative Evidence. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(1), 20–32.
Broomhead, K. (2013). Socio-Emotional Aspects of Home-School Relationships Between Parents of Children with Special Educational Needs and Educational Practitioners; Perceptions of Blame, Stigma, Partnership and Empathy (PhD Thesis). University of Lancaster, Lancaster.
Burman, E., & Parker, I. (Eds.). (1993). Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action. London: Routledge.
Burns, G., & Früchtel, F. (2014). Family Group Conference: A Bridge Between Lifeworld and System. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1147–1161.
Crossley, N. (2005). Key Concepts in Critical Social Theory. London: SAGE.
DES (Department of Education and Science). (1978). Special Educational Needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People (The Warnock Report). London: HMSO.
DfE (Department for Education). (2011). Support and Aspiration: A New Approach to Special Educational Needs and Disability – A Consultation. http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/g/green%20paper%20presentation.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.
DfE (Department for Education). (2014). Children and Families Act. London: HMSO.
DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2001). The Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs. London: HMSO.
DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2004). Removing the Barriers to Achievement: The Government’s Strategy for SEN. London: DfES.
Ellis, K. (2007). Direct Payments and Social Work Practice: The Significance of ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy’ in Determining Eligibility. British Journal of Social Work, 37(3), 405–422.
Ellis, K. (2011). ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy’ Revisited: The Changing Face of Frontline Discretion in Adult Social Care in England. Social Policy and Administration, 45(3), 221–244.
Gale, T. (2000). Rethinking Social Justice in Schools: How Will We Recognise It When We See It? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(3), 253–269.
Hodge, N. (2005). Reflections on Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders. Disability and Society, 20(3), 345–349.
Hodge, N., & Runswick-Cole, K. A. (2008). Problematising Parent-Professional Relationships. Disability and Society, 23(6), 637–647.
Hodge, N., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2013). “They Never Pass Me the Ball”: Disabled Children’s Experiences of Leisure. Children’s Geographies, 11(3), 311–325.
Husserl, E. (1931). Cartesian Meditations (D. Cairns, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6, 391–409.
Lumby, J. (2007). Parent Voice: Knowledge, Values and Viewpoint. Improving Schools, 10(3), 220–232.
MacKenzie, C., & Scully, J. L. (2007). Moral Imagination, Disability & Embodiment. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(4), 335–351.
Mallett, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Approaching Disability: Critical Issues and Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
MoJ (Ministry of Justice). (2013). Tribunals Statistics Quarterly – July to September 2013- Includes SEND Information for the Academic Year 2012–13. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/265148/quarterly-tribs-q2-2013-14.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.
Parker, I. (2002). Critical Discursive Psychology. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Runswick-Cole, K. A. (2007). The Tribunal Was the Most Stressful Thing: The Experiences of Families Who Go to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal (SENDisT). Disability and Society, 22(3), 315–328.
Runswick-Cole, K. A. (2008). Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Parents’ Attitudes to the Inclusion of Their Children with Special Educational Needs in Mainstream Schools. British Journal of Special Education, 35(3), 137–180.
Runswick-Cole, K. A., & Hodge, N. (2009). Needs or Rights? A Challenge to the Discourse of Special Education. British Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 198–203.
Timpson, E. (2014, July 10). An Address to the Association of Directors of Children’s Services (ADCS). https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/edward-timpson-talks-about-special-educational-needs-reforms. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the parents, carers and practitioners who have shared their experiences and permitted us to represent them here. We would also like to thank members of the Disability Research Forum at Sheffield Hallam University for their feedback on a presentation of this work and Jack Levinson, City University New York, for directing us to the work of Lipsky.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hodge, N., Runswick-Cole, K. (2018). “You Say… I Hear…”: Epistemic Gaps in Practitioner-Parent/Carer Talk. In: Runswick-Cole, K., Curran, T., Liddiard, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54445-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54446-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)