Skip to main content

A Diversity of Childhoods: Considering the Looked After Childhood

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies

Abstract

  • This chapter centres on the lives of disabled children and ‘Looked After Children’, many of whom are disabled.

  • We ask: Can disabled children’s childhood studies (DCCS) be useful towards thinking about other forms of non-normative childhood?

  • We focus on three areas: (i) surveillance and intimacy; (ii) pathology and psychologisation; and (iii) vulnerability and future.

  • We conclude that DCCS offers new perspectives on the lives of Looked After Children and that it is a framework that can be used to think through other ‘non-normative’ childhoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Legislation differs between England, Scotland, and Wales.

References

  • Abbott, D. W. F., & Carpenter, J. S. W. (2014). ‘Wasting Precious Time’: Young Men with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Negotiate the Transition to Adulthood. Disability & Society, 29(1), 1192–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, B., Rabiee, P., & Sloper, P. (2007). Outcomes for Parents with Disabled Children, Research Works, 2007–03. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. (2014). The Experience of Life Story Work: Reflections of Young People Leaving Care (Unpublished D.Clin. Psy. Thesis). Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (2012). Emotional Reflexivity: Feeling, Emotion and Imagination in Reflexive Dialogues. Sociology, 46(3), 458–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas, M. (2016). ‘Child Psychological Abuse, Public Health and Social Justice: The Cinderella Law Debate’, In J. Drerup, G. Graf, C. Schickhardt, G. Schweiger (Eds.) Justice, Education and the Politics of Childhood: Challenges and Perspectives. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. pg. 137-153

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of Ableism: Territories, Objects, Disability and Desire. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Children Act. (1989). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: A Distinct Approach? Disability & Society, 29(10), 1617–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2013). Children Looked After by Local Authorities in England (Including Adoption and Care Leavers) – Year Ending 31 March 2013. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2015). Children Looked After in England (Including Adoption and Care Leavers) Year Ending 31 March 2014. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecclestone, K., & Goodley, D. (2014). Political and Educational Springboard or Straitjacket?: Theorising Post/Humanist Subjects in an Age of Vulnerability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.927112.

  • Exley, C., & Letherby, G. (2001). Managing a Disrupted Life Course: Issues of Identity and Emotion Work. Health, 5(1), 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Family Law. (2015). UK Children’s Commissioners Urge UK Government to Protect Children from Austerity Measures. Online. Available from: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/uk-children-s-commissioners-urge-uk-government-to-protect-children-from-austerity-measures#.VztM8avfDFI. Accessed 3 May 2016.

  • Fineman, M. (2008). The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, H., & Marlier, E. (2011). Assessment of Social Inclusion Policy Developments in the EU: Main Findings and Suggestions on the Way Forward. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2010). Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary. London/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2010). Emancipating Play: Dis/abled Children, Development and Deconstruction. Disability and Society, 25(4), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2011). The Violence of Disablism. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33(4), 602–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012). Reading Rosie: The Postmodern Dis/abled Child. Educational and Child Psychology, 29(2), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Becoming Dishuman: Thinking About the Human Through Dis/ Ability. Discourse: Cultural Politics of Education, 37(5). doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.930021.

  • Goodley, D., Runswick-Cole, K., & Liddiard, K. (2015). The DisHuman Child. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education: Special Issue: Fabulous Monsters: Alternative Discourses of Childhood in Education, 37, 5. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1075731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyer, A. (2013). Understanding Looked-After Childhoods. Child & Family Social Work, 18(4), 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiles, D., et al. (2014). “So What Am I?” – Multiple Perspectives on Young People’s Experience of Leaving Care. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S., & Crowley, A. (2013). Looked-After Children and Their Birth Families: Using Sociology to Explore Changing Relationships, Hidden Histories and Nomadic Childhoods. Child & Family Social Work, 18, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, Queer, Crip. Indiana: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, J., & McKinney, K. A. (2013). Consuming an Edge: ADHD, Stimulant Use, and Psy Culture at the Corporate University. Transcultural Psychiatry, 50(3), 371–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddiard, K. (2014). The Work of Disabled Identities in Intimate Relationships. Disability and Society, 29(1), 115–128. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.776486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddiard, K. (2015) Fostering Diary. Personal Account.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddiard, K., & Slater, J. (2017). “Like, Pissing Yourself Is Not a Particularly Attractive Quality, Let’s Be Honest”: Learning to Contain Through Youth, Adulthood, Disability and Sexuality. Sexualities. Special Issue: Disability and Sexual Corporeality. Online First.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, S., Hart, R., Jeffes, J., & Wilkin, A. (2010). The Impact of the Baby Peter Case on Applications for Care Orders, LGA Research Report. Slough: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Approaching Disability: Critical Issues and Perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (forthcoming). The ‘Urge to Know’ Normal: Theorising How Impairment Labels Function. In R. Mallett, C. Ogden, & J. Slater (Eds.), Precarious Positions: Theorising Normalcy and the Mundane. Chester: University of Chester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, H., Gatward, R., Corbin, T., Goodman, R., & Ford, T. (2003). The Mental Health of Young People Looked After by Local Authorities in England. London: HMSO.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2001). Empowering Looked After Children. London: LSE Research Articles Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000357/. Accessed 5 May 2016.

  • National Children’s Bureau (NCB). (2015). Corporate Parenting Toolkit. Online. Available from: http://www.ncb.org.uk/corporate-parenting/resources/corporate-parenting-tool-kit. Accessed 3 May 2016.

  • Nicolas, J. (2014). Is new ‘Cinderella’s Law’ on Emotional Neglect ‘Draconian and Unhelpful’? Community Care. Online. Available from: http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2014/04/10/new-cinderellas-law-emotional-neglect-draconian-unhelpful/. Accessed 25 April 2016.

  • Overboe, J. (2004). Articulating a Sociology of Desire Exceeding the Normative Shadows (Unpublished PhD Thesis). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C., Honigmann, J., & Clements, L. (2013). Transition to Adulthood a Guide for Practitioners Working with Disabled Young People and Their Families. Carmarthen: Cerebra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N. (2014). Researching Reform: Cinderella Law – How Might the New Criminal Measures Affect Already Existing Family Legislation? Family Law. Online. Available from: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/researching-reform-cinderella-law-how-might-the-new-criminal-measures-affect-already-existing-family-legislation#.VztJNqvfDFI. Accessed 2 May 2016.

  • Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating Psycho-emotional Dimensions of Disability and Their Influence on Identity Constructions. Disability and Society, 17(5), 493–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, D. (2004). Psycho-Emotional Dimensions of Disability and the Social Model. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research. Leeds: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, C., Chandler, E., Harrison, E., Liddiard, K., & Ferrari, M. (2015). Project Re•Vision: Disability at the Edges of Representation. Disability and Society, 30(4), 513–527. OPEN ACCESS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, T. (2013). ‘We Are All in This Together’? The Hidden Costs of Poverty, Recession and Austerity Policies on Britain’s Poorest Children. Children & Society, 27, 406–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runswick-Cole, K., & Goodley, D. (2015). DisPovertyPorn: Benefits Street and the Dis/Ability Paradox. Disability and Society, 30(4), 645–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2008). Repositioning Mothers: Mothers, Disabled Children and Disability Studies. Disability & Society, 23(3), 199–210. doi:10.1080/09687590801953937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T., Gillespie-Sells, K., & Davies, D. (1996). Untold Desires: The Sexual Politics of Disability. London/New York: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, J. (2015). Youth and Disability: A Challenge to Mr Reasonable. Oxon: Ashgate Publishing Plc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smullens, S. (2015). Burnout and Self-Care in Social Work: A Guidebook for Students and Those in Mental Health and Related Professions. Washington, DC: NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulimani-Aidan, Y. (2015). Do They Get What They Expect? The Connection Between Young Adults’ Future Expectations Before Leaving Care and Outcomes After Leaving Care. Children and Youth Services Review, 55, 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulimani-Aidan, Y., & Benbenishty, R. (2011). Future Expectations of Adolescents in Residential Care in Israel. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1134–1141. doi:10.1016/j.chilyouth.2011.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Underpinning Knowledge for Childcare Practice: Reconsidering Child Development Theory. Child & Family Social Work, 9(3), 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Fostering Network. (2015). Staying Put. Online. Available from: https://www.thefosteringnetwork.org.uk/policy-practice/practice-information/staying-put. Accessed 2 May 2016.

  • Thomas, C. (1999). Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (2004). The UK Social Model of Disability: Rescuing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (2006). Disability and Gender: Reflections on Theory and Research. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(2-3), 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2014) Encouraging Playfulness to Thrive in Children with Profound Impairments: Views from Three Perspectives and a Demonstration of Art Work Produced Using Eye Gaze Technology. Paper presented at ‘There is No Them!’ The 8th Child, Youth, Family & Disability Conference, University of the West of England, 7 and 8 July.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, L., Liddiard, K. (2018). A Diversity of Childhoods: Considering the Looked After Childhood. In: Runswick-Cole, K., Curran, T., Liddiard, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54445-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54446-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics