Abstract
-
This chapter centres on the lives of disabled children and ‘Looked After Children’, many of whom are disabled.
-
We ask: Can disabled children’s childhood studies (DCCS) be useful towards thinking about other forms of non-normative childhood?
-
We focus on three areas: (i) surveillance and intimacy; (ii) pathology and psychologisation; and (iii) vulnerability and future.
-
We conclude that DCCS offers new perspectives on the lives of Looked After Children and that it is a framework that can be used to think through other ‘non-normative’ childhoods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Legislation differs between England, Scotland, and Wales.
References
Abbott, D. W. F., & Carpenter, J. S. W. (2014). ‘Wasting Precious Time’: Young Men with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Negotiate the Transition to Adulthood. Disability & Society, 29(1), 1192–1205.
Beresford, B., Rabiee, P., & Sloper, P. (2007). Outcomes for Parents with Disabled Children, Research Works, 2007–03. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. London: Polity Press.
Buchanan, A. (2014). The Experience of Life Story Work: Reflections of Young People Leaving Care (Unpublished D.Clin. Psy. Thesis). Cardiff University.
Burkitt, I. (2012). Emotional Reflexivity: Feeling, Emotion and Imagination in Reflexive Dialogues. Sociology, 46(3), 458–472.
Cabezas, M. (2016). ‘Child Psychological Abuse, Public Health and Social Justice: The Cinderella Law Debate’, In J. Drerup, G. Graf, C. Schickhardt, G. Schweiger (Eds.) Justice, Education and the Politics of Childhood: Challenges and Perspectives. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. pg. 137-153
Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of Ableism: Territories, Objects, Disability and Desire. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Children Act. (1989). London: HMSO.
Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: A Distinct Approach? Disability & Society, 29(10), 1617–1630.
Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. New York: Verso.
Department for Education. (2013). Children Looked After by Local Authorities in England (Including Adoption and Care Leavers) – Year Ending 31 March 2013. London: Department for Education.
Department for Education. (2015). Children Looked After in England (Including Adoption and Care Leavers) Year Ending 31 March 2014. London: Department for Education.
Ecclestone, K., & Goodley, D. (2014). Political and Educational Springboard or Straitjacket?: Theorising Post/Humanist Subjects in an Age of Vulnerability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.927112.
Exley, C., & Letherby, G. (2001). Managing a Disrupted Life Course: Issues of Identity and Emotion Work. Health, 5(1), 112–132.
Family Law. (2015). UK Children’s Commissioners Urge UK Government to Protect Children from Austerity Measures. Online. Available from: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/uk-children-s-commissioners-urge-uk-government-to-protect-children-from-austerity-measures#.VztM8avfDFI. Accessed 3 May 2016.
Fineman, M. (2008). The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 1–22.
Frazer, H., & Marlier, E. (2011). Assessment of Social Inclusion Policy Developments in the EU: Main Findings and Suggestions on the Way Forward. Brussels: European Commission.
Goodley, D. (2010). Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary. London/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage Publications Ltd.
Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2010). Emancipating Play: Dis/abled Children, Development and Deconstruction. Disability and Society, 25(4), 499–512.
Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2011). The Violence of Disablism. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33(4), 602–617.
Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012). Reading Rosie: The Postmodern Dis/abled Child. Educational and Child Psychology, 29(2), 53–66.
Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Becoming Dishuman: Thinking About the Human Through Dis/ Ability. Discourse: Cultural Politics of Education, 37(5). doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.930021.
Goodley, D., Runswick-Cole, K., & Liddiard, K. (2015). The DisHuman Child. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education: Special Issue: Fabulous Monsters: Alternative Discourses of Childhood in Education, 37, 5. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1075731.
Goodyer, A. (2013). Understanding Looked-After Childhoods. Child & Family Social Work, 18(4), 394–402.
Hiles, D., et al. (2014). “So What Am I?” – Multiple Perspectives on Young People’s Experience of Leaving Care. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 1–15.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
Holland, S., & Crowley, A. (2013). Looked-After Children and Their Birth Families: Using Sociology to Explore Changing Relationships, Hidden Histories and Nomadic Childhoods. Child & Family Social Work, 18, 57–66.
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, Queer, Crip. Indiana: University of Indiana Press.
Levinson, J., & McKinney, K. A. (2013). Consuming an Edge: ADHD, Stimulant Use, and Psy Culture at the Corporate University. Transcultural Psychiatry, 50(3), 371–396.
Liddiard, K. (2014). The Work of Disabled Identities in Intimate Relationships. Disability and Society, 29(1), 115–128. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.776486.
Liddiard, K. (2015) Fostering Diary. Personal Account.
Liddiard, K., & Slater, J. (2017). “Like, Pissing Yourself Is Not a Particularly Attractive Quality, Let’s Be Honest”: Learning to Contain Through Youth, Adulthood, Disability and Sexuality. Sexualities. Special Issue: Disability and Sexual Corporeality. Online First.
Macleod, S., Hart, R., Jeffes, J., & Wilkin, A. (2010). The Impact of the Baby Peter Case on Applications for Care Orders, LGA Research Report. Slough: NFER.
Mallet, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Approaching Disability: Critical Issues and Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Mallet, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (forthcoming). The ‘Urge to Know’ Normal: Theorising How Impairment Labels Function. In R. Mallett, C. Ogden, & J. Slater (Eds.), Precarious Positions: Theorising Normalcy and the Mundane. Chester: University of Chester Press.
Meltzer, H., Gatward, R., Corbin, T., Goodman, R., & Ford, T. (2003). The Mental Health of Young People Looked After by Local Authorities in England. London: HMSO.
Munro, E. (2001). Empowering Looked After Children. London: LSE Research Articles Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000357/. Accessed 5 May 2016.
National Children’s Bureau (NCB). (2015). Corporate Parenting Toolkit. Online. Available from: http://www.ncb.org.uk/corporate-parenting/resources/corporate-parenting-tool-kit. Accessed 3 May 2016.
Nicolas, J. (2014). Is new ‘Cinderella’s Law’ on Emotional Neglect ‘Draconian and Unhelpful’? Community Care. Online. Available from: http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2014/04/10/new-cinderellas-law-emotional-neglect-draconian-unhelpful/. Accessed 25 April 2016.
Overboe, J. (2004). Articulating a Sociology of Desire Exceeding the Normative Shadows (Unpublished PhD Thesis). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Parker, C., Honigmann, J., & Clements, L. (2013). Transition to Adulthood a Guide for Practitioners Working with Disabled Young People and Their Families. Carmarthen: Cerebra.
Phillips, N. (2014). Researching Reform: Cinderella Law – How Might the New Criminal Measures Affect Already Existing Family Legislation? Family Law. Online. Available from: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/researching-reform-cinderella-law-how-might-the-new-criminal-measures-affect-already-existing-family-legislation#.VztJNqvfDFI. Accessed 2 May 2016.
Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating Psycho-emotional Dimensions of Disability and Their Influence on Identity Constructions. Disability and Society, 17(5), 493–508.
Reeve, D. (2004). Psycho-Emotional Dimensions of Disability and the Social Model. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research. Leeds: The Disability Press.
Rice, C., Chandler, E., Harrison, E., Liddiard, K., & Ferrari, M. (2015). Project Re•Vision: Disability at the Edges of Representation. Disability and Society, 30(4), 513–527. OPEN ACCESS.
Ridge, T. (2013). ‘We Are All in This Together’? The Hidden Costs of Poverty, Recession and Austerity Policies on Britain’s Poorest Children. Children & Society, 27, 406–417.
Runswick-Cole, K., & Goodley, D. (2015). DisPovertyPorn: Benefits Street and the Dis/Ability Paradox. Disability and Society, 30(4), 645–649.
Ryan, S., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2008). Repositioning Mothers: Mothers, Disabled Children and Disability Studies. Disability & Society, 23(3), 199–210. doi:10.1080/09687590801953937.
Shakespeare, T., Gillespie-Sells, K., & Davies, D. (1996). Untold Desires: The Sexual Politics of Disability. London/New York: Cassell.
Slater, J. (2015). Youth and Disability: A Challenge to Mr Reasonable. Oxon: Ashgate Publishing Plc.
Smullens, S. (2015). Burnout and Self-Care in Social Work: A Guidebook for Students and Those in Mental Health and Related Professions. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Sulimani-Aidan, Y. (2015). Do They Get What They Expect? The Connection Between Young Adults’ Future Expectations Before Leaving Care and Outcomes After Leaving Care. Children and Youth Services Review, 55, 193–200.
Sulimani-Aidan, Y., & Benbenishty, R. (2011). Future Expectations of Adolescents in Residential Care in Israel. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1134–1141. doi:10.1016/j.chilyouth.2011.02.006.
Taylor, C. (2004). Underpinning Knowledge for Childcare Practice: Reconsidering Child Development Theory. Child & Family Social Work, 9(3), 225–235.
The Fostering Network. (2015). Staying Put. Online. Available from: https://www.thefosteringnetwork.org.uk/policy-practice/practice-information/staying-put. Accessed 2 May 2016.
Thomas, C. (1999). Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Thomas, C. (2004). The UK Social Model of Disability: Rescuing.
Thomas, C. (2006). Disability and Gender: Reflections on Theory and Research. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(2-3), 177–185.
Watson, D. (2014) Encouraging Playfulness to Thrive in Children with Profound Impairments: Views from Three Perspectives and a Demonstration of Art Work Produced Using Eye Gaze Technology. Paper presented at ‘There is No Them!’ The 8th Child, Youth, Family & Disability Conference, University of the West of England, 7 and 8 July.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, L., Liddiard, K. (2018). A Diversity of Childhoods: Considering the Looked After Childhood. In: Runswick-Cole, K., Curran, T., Liddiard, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54446-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54445-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54446-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)