Abstract
In February and March 2012, the Bavarian police seized 1280 artworks in the home of Cornelius Gurlitt (1932–2014) in Munich. Some of the paintings had knowingly been missing since 1945, others were not known, and at least 590 of them were suspected to have been looted by the Nazis. During the ensuing investigation into the case during Gurlitt’s lifetime and after the treasure had been inherited by the Museum of Fine Arts in Bern (Switzerland), only few paintings could be attributed to their rightful owners. While settlements over some of these paintings have so far been achieved, the question that has been prominently discussed by German and foreign media and lawyers alike was whether the state had a right to retain all 1280 paintings and whether the original owners could demand all or some of them to be returned under German law. Gurlitt had, under the German civil law, potentially acquired the rights of an owner as he was in possession of the paintings for more than ten years (§ 937 Abs. 2 German Civil Code). However, according to § 939 Abs. 2 in conjunction with § 206 German Civil Code, he could have lost ownership as the original owners were prevented to claim their rights within the relevant time frame by force majeure. The main problem revolves around whether the statute of limitations would preclude restitution. Generally, a claim has to be made within 30 years (§ 214 Abs. 1 BGB). International treaties and agreements are not applicable as they only regulate the relationship between states and claimants, but not between private parties, like Gurlitt. The 1998 Washington Agreement could have been applicable as the state had seized the paintings (legally or illegally, but most likely the latter in the present case) and was since 2012 in possession of them. By now, this problem has moved on together with the ownership to the Museum of Bern, making the 1998 Washington Agreement applicable. This chapter discusses the legal and ethical questions resulting from this high-profile case both under the applicable German law and in comparative international perspective. The practical implications for galleries and museums exhibiting stolen or looted works of art in Germany, Switzerland and internationally are also considered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
American Alliance of Museums (AAM). (1998). Guidelines concerning the unlawful appropriation of objects during the Nazi era. AAM. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from http://www.aam-us.org/resources/ethics-standards-and-best-practices/collections-stewardship/objects-during-the-nazi-era.
Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD). (1998, June 4). Report of the AAMD task force on the spoliation of art during the Nazi/World War II era 1933–1945. AAMD. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from https://aamd.org/object-registry/resolution-of-claims-for-nazi-era-cultural-assets/more-info.
BBC News Europe. (2013, November 3). Nazi looted art found in Munich – German media. BBC. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24794970.
Bohr, F., Gezer, Ö., Gorris, L., Knöfel, U., Röbel, S., Sontheimer, M., & Winter, S. (2013a, November 11). Phantom collector: The mystery of the Munich Nazi art trove. Der Spiegel Online. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-mystery-of-the-gurlitt-family-and-the-munich-nazi-art-find-a-932899.html.
Bohr, F., Gorris, L., Knöfel, U., Röbel, S., & Sontheimer, M. (2013b, December 23). Art dealer to the fuhrer. Hildebrand Gurlitt’s deep Nazi ties. Spiegel Online. Retrieved May 30, 2018, from http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/hildebrand-gurlitt-and-his-dubious-dealings-with-nazi-looted-art-a-940625.html.
Carey, J. M. (2018, April 19). Book review: Modern masters and the Gurlitt status. Museum Bookstore. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.museumbookstore.com/blogs/book-review/book-review-modern-masters-and-the-gurlitt-status.
Chappell, D., & Hufnagel, S. (2015). The Gurlitt case: German and international responses to ownership rights in looting cases. In J. D. Kila & M. Balcells (Eds.), Cultural property crime: An overview and analysis of contemporary perspectives and trends. Brill: Leiden.
Chase, J. (2014, May 7). Unanswered questions abound after death of “art hermit” Gurlitt. DW. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from http://www.dw.de/unanswered-questions-abound-after-death-of-art-hermit-gurlitt/a-17615933.
Connolly, K. (2017, October 27). Works hoarded by son of Nazi art dealer to go on public display. The Guardian. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/27/works-hoarded-by-son-of-nazi-art-dealer-cornelius-gurlitt-to-go-on-public-display.
Dege, S. (2017, June 30). Shipment to Switzerland of ‘Degenerate Art’ from Gurlitt trove delayed. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from http://www.dw.com/en/shipment-to-switzerland-of-degenerate-art-from-gurlitt-trove-delayed/a-39495176.
Eddy, M. (2017, June 27). First public showing of Monet, Rodin and Maillols from Gurlitt trove. New York Times. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/arts/design/first-public-showing-of-monet-rodin-and-maillols-from-gurlitt-trove.html.
Edsel, R. (2009). The monuments men. Allied heroes, Nazi thieves, and the greatest treasure hunt in history. New York: Center Street, Hachette Book Group.
Gerstenblith, P. (2008). Art, cultural heritage, and the law. Cases and materials. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Gezer, Ö. (2013, November 17). Interview with a Phantom: Cornelius Gurlitt shares his secrets. Spiegel Online. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/spiegel-interview-with-cornelius-gurlitt-about-munich-art-find-a-933953.html.
Gilbert, S. (2018, March 11). The persistent crime of Nazi-looted art. The Atlantic. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/03/cornelius-gurlitt-nazi-looted-art/554936/.
Glover, M. (2017, November 7). Nazi art theft: How Hitler’s art dealer amassed looted paintings to save his own skin. The Independent. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/hitler-hildebrand-gurlitt-cornelius-gurlitt-nazi-art-theft-a8041501.html.
Hauser-Schäublin, B. (2017). Ethnologische Provenienzforschung – warum heute? In L. Förster, I. Edenheiser, S. Fründt, & H. Hartmann (Eds.), Provenienzforschung zu ethnographischen Sammlungen der Kolonialzeit – Positionen in der aktuellen Debatte (pp. 327–333). München: Arbeitsgruppe Museum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sozial- und Kulturanthropologie.
Hickley, C. (2017, July 23). Gurlitt bequest spurs provenance research in Switzerland. The Artnewspaper. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/gurlitt-bequest-spurs-provenance-research-in-switzerland.
Hoffmann, M. (2017). Hildebrand Gurlitt and his dealings with German museums during the “Third Reich”. New German Critique, 44(1 (130)), 35–55.
Huyssen, A., Rabinbach, A., & Shalem, A. (2017). Nazi-looted art and its legacies: Introduction. New German Critique, 44(1 (130)), 1–7.
Kreis, G. (2017, October 26). Die diskreten Schweizer Geschäfte des Hildebrand Gurlitt. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/die-diskreten-schweizer-geschaefte-des-hildebrand-gurlitt-ld.1324331.
Miles, M. (2008). Art as plunder: The ancient origins of debate about cultural property. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nicholas, L. (1994). The rape of Europa. The fate of Europe’s treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. London: Borzoi Books.
Perlson, H. (2017, November 3). Hildebrand Gurlitt built a brilliant trove of art under the Nazis. Two new exhibitions show his taste, and his duplicity. Artnet News. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://news.artnet.com/exhibitions/gurlitt-trove-bern-bonn-shows-1137587.
Peters, O. (Ed.). (2014). Degenerate art. The attack on modern art in Nazi Germany 1937. New York: Prestel and Neue Galerie.
Petropoulos, J. (2016). Art dealer networks in the Third Reich and in the postwar period. Journal of Contemporary History, 52(3), 546–565.
Plundered Art. (2011, June 25). Revisiting the Washington conference principles on Nazi confiscated art – 13 years later. Plundered Art – A perspective from the Holocaust Art Restitution Project. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from http://plundered-art.blogspot.com.au/2011/06/revisiting-washington-conference.html.
Pound, C. (2017, December 13). The Nazi art hoard that shocked the world. BBC Culture. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20171212-the-nazi-art-hoard-that-shocked-the-world.
Röbel, S., & Sontheimer, M. (2014, May 6). Kunsterbe Cornelius Gurlitt: Tod eines Phantoms. Spiegel Online. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/nachruf-auf-cornelius-gurlitt-a-967943.html.
Schwartz, M. (2018, January 31). Face to face with the Gurlitt hoard. Apollo Magazine. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.apollo-magazine.com/face-to-face-with-the-gurlitt-hoard/.
van Selle, D., & van Selle, C. (2012, March 19). BGH-Urteil zur Sammlung Sachs – Eigentum an NS Raubkunst kennt keine Fristen. Legal Tribune. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from http://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/bgh-urteil-zur-sammlung-sachs-eigentum-an-ns-raubkunst-kennt-keine-fristen/.
Voss, J. (2017). Have German restitution politics been advanced since the Gurlitt case? A journalist’s perspective. New German Critique, 44(1 (130)), 57–73.
Vrdoljak, A. F. (2016). The criminalisation of the illicit trade in cultural property. In H. Geismar & J. Anderson (Eds.), Cultural property reader. London: Routledge.
Washington Conference on Holocaust Era Assets. (1998, December 3). Washington Conference Principles on Nazi confiscated art. US Department of State. Retrieved July 31, 2014, from http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rt/hlcst/122038.htm.
Zeit Online. (2018, April 18). NS-Kunstraub: Bern zeigt Hildebrand Gurlitt als Geschäftemacher. Die Zeit Online. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from https://www.zeit.de/news/2018-04/18/bern-zeigt-hildebrand-gurlitt-als-geschaeftemacher-180418-99-946632.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hufnagel, S., Chappell, D. (2019). The Gurlitt ‘Collection’ and Nazi-Looted Art. In: Hufnagel, S., Chappell, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54405-6_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54405-6_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54404-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54405-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)