Meeting the Demands of ELT Innovation in Vietnam: Teachers’ Linguistic and Pedagogic Challenge

  • Le Thi Quynh TranEmail author
Part of the International Perspectives on English Language Teaching book series (INPELT)


Tran introduces an English curriculum change context where policy makers provide both language and methodological in-service programmes, to support teachers’ implementation capacity. Teachers are required to reach CEFR level C1 to ensure their continued employment. Her interviewee explains that while such enhancement provision appears supportive, no attempt has been made to communicate its rationale to teachers. Thus, for many teachers, the requirement to attend these programmes only adds to the challenges that curriculum implementation poses for their feelings of self-efficacy. Tran additionally analyses some outcomes of providing in-service programmes staffed by trainers who have little or no first-hand understanding of the contexts in which teachers work.


English Language Teaching (ELT) Common European Framework Of Reference (CEFR) CEFR Level English Curriculum textbooksTextbooks 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baldauf, J.R.B., R.B. Kaplan, N. Kamwangamalu, and P. Bryant. 2011. Success or failure of primary second/foreign language programmes in Asia: What do the data tell us? Current Issues in Language Planning 12 (2): 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Do, M.H. 2014. Towards more flexible organization. In Higher education in Vietnam-flexibility, mobility and practicality in the global knowledge economy, ed. L. Tran, S. Marginson, H. Do, Q. Do, T. Le, N. Nguyen, T. Vu, T. Pham, and H. Nguyen, 54–85. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Gao, X. (2008). Teachers’ professional vulnerability and cultural tradition: A Chinese paradox. Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (1): 154–165.Google Scholar
  4. Garton, S. 2014. Unresolved issues and new challenges in teaching English to young learners: the case of South Korea. Current Issues in Language Planning 15 (2): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hallinger, P. 2010. Making education reform happen: Is there an ‘Asian’ way? School Leadership & Management 30 (5): 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hallinger, P., and M. Lee. 2011. A decade of education reform in Thailand: Broken promise or impossible dream? Cambridge Journal of Education 41 (2): 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayes, D. 2008. In-service teacher education in primary ELT. Paper presented at the Regional Seminar.Google Scholar
  8. Hayes, D. 2012. Mismatched perspectives : In-service teacher education policy and practice in South Korea. In Managing change in English language teaching : Lessons from experience, ed. C. Tribble, 99–104. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  9. Hoang, V.V. 2010. The current situation and issues of the teaching of English in Vietnam. Institute of International Language and Culture Studies, 22 (1): 7–18. Retrieved from
  10. Hoang, V.V., Nguyen, T. C, and Hoang, X. H. 2006. Innovating ELT methodology in Vietnam ’s Upper Secondary School Hanoi: Education Publisher.Google Scholar
  11. Hutchinson, T. 1991. The management of change. Teacher Trainer 5 (3): 19–21.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs, G.M, and Farrell, T.S.C. 2001. Paradigm shift: Understanding and implementing change in second language education. TESL-EJ, 5 (1).Google Scholar
  13. Kaplan, R.B., R.B. Baldauf Jr., and N. Kamwangamalu. 2011. Why educational language plans sometimes fail. Current Issues in Language Planning 12 (2): 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirkpatrick, A. 2008. English as the official working language of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): Features and strategies. English Today 94 (24–2): 37–44.Google Scholar
  15. Lamb, M. 1995. The consequences of INSET. ELT journal 49 (1): 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Le, V.C. 2004. From Ideology to Inquiry: Mediating Asian and Western Values in ELT. Teacher’s Edition. 28–35.Google Scholar
  17. Le, V.C. 2007. A historical review of English language education in Vietnam. In English education in Asia: History and policies, ed. Y. Choi, and B. Spolsky, 167–179. ASIA TEFL: Seoul.Google Scholar
  18. Le, V.C. 2014. Great expectations: The TESOL practicum as a professional learning experience. TESOL Journal 5 (2): 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Le, V.C., and R. Barnard. 2009. Curricular innovation behind closed classroom doors: A Vietnamese case study. Teacher’s Edition (Vietnam) 24 (2): 20–33.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, M.W. 2014. Will communicative language teaching work? Teachers’ perceptions toward the new educational reform in South Korea. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 3 (2): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levin, B., and M. Fullan. 2008. Learning about systems renewal. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 36 (2): 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MOET. 2006. The English curriculum for the secondary school. Hanoi: Education Publisher.Google Scholar
  23. Nguyen, M.H. 2013a. The curriculum for English language teacher education in Australian and Vietnamese universities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 38 (11): 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nguyen, N.H. 2013b. National Foreign languages 2020 project Paper presented at the Vietnam Engineering Education Conference Viet Nam.Google Scholar
  25. Nguyen, T.M.H. 2011. Primary English language education policy in Vietnam: Insights from implementation. Current Issues in Language Planning 12 (2): 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen, T.M.H., and Q.T. Nguyen. 2007. Teaching English in primary schools in Vietnam: An overview. Current Issues in Language Planning 8 (2): 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nguyen, T.T.M. 2007. Textbook evaluation: The case of English textbooks currently in use at Vietnam’s upper-secondary school. Unpublished research report. Singapore: RELC SEAMEO.Google Scholar
  28. Nunan, D. 2003. The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia- Pacific region. Tesol Quarterly 37 (4): 589–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orafi, S.M.S., and S. Borg. 2009. Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System 37 (2): 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Park, M., and Y.-K. Sung. 2013. Teachers’ perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms and their implementation: what can we learn from the case of Korean elementary teachers? Asia Pacific Journal of Education 33 (1): 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pham, H.H. 2001. Teacher development: A real need for English departments in Vietnam English Teaching Forum, 39 (4). Retrieved from–39-4-f.pdf.
  32. Phan, L.H., V.H. Ha, and B. Dat. 2014. Language policies in modern-day Vietnam: Changes, challenges and complexities. In Language, Education and Nation-building: Assimilation and shift in Southeast Asia, ed. P. Sercombe, and R. Tupas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Sakui, K. 2004. Wearing two pairs of shoes: Language teaching in Japan. ELT journal 58 (2): 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Segovia, L.P.d., and Hardison, D.M. 2009. Implementing education reform: EFL teachers’ perspectives. ELT journal, 63(2): 154–162.Google Scholar
  35. The Government of Vietnam. 2008. Đề án 1400: Dạy và học ngoại ngữ trong hệ thống giáo dục quốc dân giai đoạn 2008 – 2020 (In Vietnamese) [Decision 1400 : Teaching and Learning Foreign Languages in the National Education System, Period 2008-2020]. HaNoi.Google Scholar
  36. To, T.T.H. 2010. Insights from Vietnam. In Learning through English: Policies, challenges and prospects. Insights from East Asia,ed. R. Johnstone, 96–114. Kuala Lumpur: British Council.Google Scholar
  37. Van Veen, K., and P. Sleegers. (2006). How does it feel? Teachers’ emotions in a context of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (1): 85–111.Google Scholar
  38. Waters, A., and M.L.C. Vilches. 2008. Factors affecting ELT reforms : The case of the Philippines basic education curriculum. RELC Journal 39 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wedell, M. 2009. Planning for educational change : Putting people and their contexts first. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  40. Wedell, M. 2011. More than just ‘technology’: English language teaching initiatives as complex educational changes. In Dreams and Realities: Developing countries and the English Language, ed. H. Coleman. London: British Council.Pages 269–290.Google Scholar
  41. Wright, S. 2002. Language education and foreign relations in Vietnam. In Language policies in education : Critical issues, ed. J.W. Tollefson, 225–244. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Languages and International StudiesHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations