Abstract
This chapter considers the main messages emerging from the teachers’ stories and how these help to explain the very limited success of the English teaching curriculum initiatives in most of the countries included. We see evidence of temporal dissonance between the concepts of teaching and learning and recommended teaching approaches introduced by English curricula, and those prevailing more widely within the existing educational culture; . Such dissonance, and other commonly mentioned factors, contributes to the state of contextual confusion evident in most of the stories, which in turn makes curriculum implementation professionally and personally risky for teachers.
References
Al-Daami, K.K., and G. Wallace. 2007. Curriculum reform in a global context: A study of teachers in Jordan. Journal of Curriculum Studies 39 (3): 339–360.
Ballard, B. 1996. Through language to learning: Preparing overseas students for study in Western universities. In Society and the language classroom, ed. H. Coleman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ballard, B., and J. Clanchy. 1991. Teaching students from overseas: A brief guide for lecturers and supervisors. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
Bascia, N., and A. Hargreaves. 2000. Teaching and leading on the sharp edge of change. In The sharp edge of change: Teaching, leading and the realities of reform, ed. N. Bascia and A. Hargreaves. London: Routledge/Falmer.
Birzea, C., and Fartusnic, C. 2003. Reforming the Romanian system of education: The agenda ahead. In E. Polyzoi, M. Fullan and Anchan, J.P. (eds). Change forces in Post-Communist Eastern Europe, pp. 74–93. London: Routledge Falmer.
Blackler, F.H.M., and S. Shinmin. 1984. Applying psychology in organizations. New York: Methuen.
Coburn, C.E., and J.L. Russell. 2008. District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 30 (3): 203–235.
Coleman, H. 1996. Society and the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, B., and D. Sumara. 2006. Complexity and education. London: Routledge.
Davis, B., D. Sumara, and L. D’Amour. 2012. Understanding school districts as learning systems: Some lessons from three cases of complex transformation. Journal of Educational Change 13 (3): 373–399.
Fink, D. 2001. The two solitudes—policy makers and policy implementers. In Taking education really seriously. Four years’ hard labour. ed. M. Fielding. London: Routledge.
Fullan, M. 2001. Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M. 2007. The new meaning of educational change. London: Routledge.
Gao, X. 2008. Teachers’ professional vulnerability and cultural tradition: A Chinese paradox. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 154–165.
Grassick, L. 2016. Complexity, connections and sense-making: Stakeholder experiences of primary English language curriculum change in one province in Vietnam. University of Leeds, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
Goodson, I. 2014. Context, curriculum and professional knowledge. History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society 43 (6): 768–776.
Hu, G. 2002. Potential cultural resistance of pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum 15 (2): 93–105.
Humphries, S. 2014. Factors influencing Japanese teachers’ adoption of communication-oriented textbooks. In International perspectives on materials in ELT, ed. S. Garton and K. Graves. Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 15.
Humphries, S., and A. Burns. 2015. In reality it’s almost impossible: CLT-oriented curriculum change. ELT Journal 69 (3): 239–248.
Karavas, E. 2014. Implementing innovation in primary EFL: A case study in Greece. ELT Journal 68 (3): 243–253.
Kelchtermans, G. 2005. Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (8): 995–1006.
Kelchtermans, G. 2009. Who am I in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice 15 (2): 257–272.
Kirkgöz, Y. 2008. A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 1859–1875.
Le Fevre, D.M. 2015. Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education 38: 56–64.
Levin, B., and M.G. Fullan. 2008. Learning about systems renewal. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 36 (2): 289–303.
McLaughlin, M.W. 2006. Implementation research in education: Lessons learned, lingering questions and new opportunities. In New directions in education policy implementation, ed. M.I. Honig. New York: State University of New York Press.
Mellegård, I., and K.D. Petterson. 2016. Teachers’ responses to curriculum change: balancing external and internal change forces. Teacher Development, 20(2): 181–196.
Porter, R.E., L.D. Fusarelli, and B.C. Fusarelli. 2015. Implementing the common core: How educators interpret curriculum reform. Educational Policy 29 (1): 111–139.
Radford, M. 2006. Researching classrooms: Complexity and chaos. British Educational Research Journal 32 (2): 177–190.
Schweisfurth, M. 2011. Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development 31: 425–435.
Schweisfurth, M. 2013. Learner-centred education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development?. London: Routledge.
Spillane, J.P., and J.S. Zeuli. 1999. Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21 (1): 1–27.
Tabulawa, R. 2013. Teaching and learning in context. Why pedagogical reforms fail in Sub-Saharan Africa. Dakar: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.
van Veen, K., and P. Sleegers. 2006. How does it feel? Teachers’ emotions in a context of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (1): 85–111.
Wang, D. 2011. The dilemma of time: Student-centred teaching in the rural classroom in China. Teaching and Teacher Education 27: 157–164.
Wedell, M. 2009. Planning for educational change. London: Continuum.
Wedell, M., and A. Malderez. 2013. Understanding language classroom contexts. London: Bloomsbury.
Wise, A. 1977. Why educational policies often fail: The hyperrationalization hypothesis. Journal of Curriculum Studies 9 (1): 43–57.
Yin, H, Lee, Chi-Kee, J., and Wang, W. 2014. Dilemmas of leading national curriculum reform in a global era: A Chinese perspective. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 42(2): 293–311.
Zembylas, M. 2010. Teacher emotions in the context of educational reforms. In Second international handbook of educational change. ed. A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, and D. Hopkins. Springer International Handbooks of Education.
Zheng, X-M., and Davidson, C. 2008. Changing pedagogy: Analysing ELT teachers in China. London and New York: Continuum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grassick, L., Wedell, M. (2018). Temporal Dissonance, Contextual Confusion and Risk: Learning from the Experiences of Teachers Living with Curriculum Change. In: Wedell, M., Grassick, L. (eds) International Perspectives on Teachers Living with Curriculum Change. International Perspectives on English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54309-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54309-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54308-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54309-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)