Advertisement

From Initial Rigidity to Greater Flexibility: The Changing Face of English Curriculum Change Implementation in Cuba

  • Islaura Tejeda ArencibiaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on English Language Teaching book series (INPELT)

Abstract

Arencibia outlines the evolution of an English curriculum change originally implemented in a top down, decontextualised manner. Arencibia reports how growing acknowledgement of the value of stakeholder involvement has increased policy makers’ understanding of the importance of contextualising the curriculum for every school. The teacher explains her initial experiences of the ‘imposed curriculum’, and of the formal support that attempted to enable teachers to understand how to begin to adapt the curriculum for their own learners. She feels that decision-making about the content and process of support provision does not yet take sufficient notice of teachers’ voices. Defining what a flexible English curriculum means in practice, and how its development might best be supported continues to be discussed.

References

  1. Bolitho, R. 2012. Projects and programmes: Contemporary experience in ELT change management. In Managing change in English language teaching: Lessons from experience, ed. C. Tribble, 33–46. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  2. Castellanos Simons, D., B. Castellanos Simons, J.M. Llivina Lavigne, M. Silverio Gómez, C. Reinoso Cápiro, and C. García Sánchez. 2005. Aprender y enseñar en la escuela. Una concepción desarrolladora. Ciudad de La Habana: Ediorial Pueblo y Educación.Google Scholar
  3. Crookes, G. 2007. A practicum in TESOL: Professional development through teaching practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Enriquez O’Farrill, I.J. 2000. Curso de Inglés por Televisión. Orientaciones Metodológicas para Secundaria Básica. Ciudad de La Habana: MINED.Google Scholar
  5. Enríquez O’Farrill, I.J., et al. 2006. Programas y orientaciones metodológicas de la secundaria básica para la asignatura Inglés. Ciudad de La Habana: Editorial Pueblo y Educación.Google Scholar
  6. Finney, D. 2002. The ELT curriculum: A flexible model for a changing world. In Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice‚ eds. J. C. Richards, and W. A. Renandya‚ 69–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Font Milián S.A. 2006. Metodología para la asignatura Inglés en la secundaria básica desde una concepción problémica del enfoque comunicativo. Unpublished doctoral thesis., Faculty of Foreign Languages, Enrique José Varona Pedagogical University of Havana.Google Scholar
  8. Fullan, M. 1992. Successful improvement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gaceta Oficial de la República de Cuba. 2002. Constitución de la República de Cuba. La Habana: Editorial Pueblo y Educación.Google Scholar
  10. Kumaravadivelu, B. 2003. A postmethod perspective on English language teaching. World Englishes 22: 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumaravadivelu, B. 2006. TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly 40: 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oficina Nacional de Estadística e Información. 2015. Available from http://www.one.cu/publicaciones/provincias_masinf/las%20tunas.htm. In Spanish, Accessed on 16 August 2015.
  13. Richards, J.C. 2008. Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Richards, J.C., and T.S. Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. UNESCO. 2010. World data on education. VII Ed. 2010/2011 Available at http://www.ibe.unesco.org. In Spanish, Accessed on 8 August 2015.
  16. Velázquez Cobiella, E.E. 2015. Education: Challenges and political will. Inaugural Lecture by the Minister of Education of the Republic of Cuba at Pedagogy 2015, January 26th, Havana International Conference Center.Google Scholar
  17. Wedell, M., and A. Malderez. 2013. Understanding language classroom contexts: The starting point for change. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  18. Willis, J. and D. Willis. (eds). 1996. Challenge and change in language teaching. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Wise, A. 1977. Why educational policies often fail: The hyperrationalisation hypothesis. Journal of Curriculum Studies 9 (1): 4557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign LanguagesUniversity of Las TunasLas TunasCuba

Personalised recommendations