Advertisement

Living with Curriculum Change: An Overview

  • Martin WedellEmail author
  • Laura Grassick
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on English Language Teaching book series (INPELT)

Abstract

Here we situate the book in today’s global English Language Teaching context, and provide our rationale for exploring teachers ’ experiences of implementing complex English curriculum changes. We outline the structure of the book and explain the methodology used to gather the teachers stories that represent the core of each of the following chapters. The chapter ends with a series of questions that invite you to link important issues raised by the teachers’ stories that follow, to your own experiences of ‘living with curriculum change’.

References

  1. Abrahams, M.J., and M. Farias. 2010. Struggling for change in Chilean EFL teacher education. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal 12 (2): 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitaive Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Carless, D. 2003. Factors in the implementation of task based learning in primary schools. System 31 (4): 485–500.Google Scholar
  5. Chacón, C.T. 2012. Task-based language teaching through film-oriented activities in a teacher education program in Venezuela. In Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts. Research and implementations, ed. A. Shehadeh and C. Coombe, 241–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Chin, R., and K.D. Benne. 1976. General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In The planning of change, ed. W.G. Bennis, K.D. Benne, R. Chin, and K.E. Corey, 3rd ed. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  7. Crystal, D. 2000. Emerging Englishes. English Teaching Professional, 12.Google Scholar
  8. De Segovia, L.P., and D.M. Hardison. 2009. Implementing educational reform: EFL teachers’ perspectives. English Language Teaching Journal 63 (2): 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fullan, M.G. 2007. The new meaning of educational change, 4th ed. London: Columbia Teachers Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fullan, M.G. 1992. Successful improvement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Garton, S., F. Copland, and A. Burns. 2011. Investigating global practices in teaching English to young learners. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  12. Graddol, D. 2006. English Next. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins, J. 2015. Global Englishes, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Ho, I.T.F. 2003. Are Chinese teachers authoritarian? In Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and Pedagogical perspectives. 99–114. Hong Kong: CERC.Google Scholar
  15. Hu, G. 2002. Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum 15 (2): 93–105. Google Scholar
  16. Levin, B., and M.G. Fullan. 2008. Learning about systems renewal. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 36 (2): 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li.D. 1998. It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communictive approach. TESOL Quarterly 32 (4): 677–703.Google Scholar
  18. Lincoln, Y.S., and E. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Malderez, M. and M. Wedell. 2007. Teaching teachers: Processes and practices. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Merriam, S.B. 2009. Qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, R., and Lee J. 2003. Sameness and difference in classroom learning cultures: Intepretations of Communicative pedagogy in the UK and Korea. Language Teaching Research 7 (1): 35–63. Google Scholar
  22. Nunan, D. 1999. Second language teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  23. Orafi, S. 2008. Investigating teachers’ practices and beliefs in relation to curriculum innovation in ELT in Libya. Unpublished doctoral thesis., School of Education, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  24. Padwad, A., and Dixit, K. 2015. ELE Policy and pedagogy in India: A study of the Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education. In Experiences of Second Language Teacher Education, ed. T. Wright and M. Beaumont, 153–174. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Pettigrew, A., and R. Whipp. 1991. Managing change for competitive success. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Prince, E., and A. Barrett. 2014. Continuing professional development in action: An Indian experience. In Innovations in the continuing professional development of English language teachers, ed. D. Hayes, 19–44. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  27. Rixon, S. 2013. British council survey of policy and practice in primary English language teaching worldwide. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  28. Savignon, S. 1997. Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice, 2nd ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Schweisfurth, M. 2011. Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development 31: 425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schweisfurth, M. 2013. Learner-centred education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy. Google Scholar
  31. Shrestha, Prithvi. 2008. ELT, ESP & EAP in Nepal: whose interests are served? In EAP and ESP in developing countries: State of play vs actual needs and wants, ed. M. Krzanowski, 191–210. Canterbury: IATEFL (ESP SIG).Google Scholar
  32. TESOL Report. 2014. International TEFL Academy Articles. Available at: http://www.internationalteflacademy.com/blog/bid/205659/Report-from-TESOL-2014-1-5-Billion-English-Learners-Worldwide. Accessed on 26/09/2016.
  33. Vavrus, F. 2009. The cultural politics of constructivist pedagogies: Teacher education reform in the United Republic of Tanzania. International journal of Educational Development 29: 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, Q., and L. Wang. 2000. English language curriculum developments for schools in China. Paper presented at the ILEC conference, December 2000, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  35. Wedell, M. 2013. Proficiency in English as a key to development? Helping teachers to help learners to succeed. In English and development: Policy, pedagogy and globalization, ed. E. Erling and P. Seargeant, 141–163. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  36. Wei, R., and J. Su. 2012. The statistics of English in China. English Today 28: 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations