Abstract
Avatar, Gravity and The Hole are all, to some degree, concerned with characters’ mastery over the stereoscopic diegesis. In the first, a character rejected the opportunity to master Pandora in favour of a more participatory engagement with it, a relationship articulated through their enjoyment of the locus. In Gravity, Stone gained control of her situation by crossing back and forth over the screen plane at will and in the last chapter we saw how Dane’s victory was evidenced by his ability to inhabit the platea and the off-screen space that it implied. The following two films, The Great Gatsby and Frozen, are less concerned with the loss and eventual achievement of mastery than they are with intimacy that is either reached or rejected. I want to read these two texts closely in order to see how stereography spatializes the relationships between characters in each film. They each do this by limning our impression of either those characters’ closeness to or their distance from each other, as well as their spatial relationship to us. In The Great Gatsby, it is largely a case of distance rather than proximity. In this chapter, then, I will analyse how the film stereographically manipulates the impression of distance in order to spatially articulate its source novel’s explorations of the inaccessible past.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bennett, B. 2013. The normativity of 3D: Cinematic journeys, “imperial visuality” and unchained cameras. Jump Cut. Available at: http://www.ejumpcut.org/currentissue/Bennett-3D/index.html
Cook, P. 2013. Within and Without: The Great Gatsby 3D Experience. Fashion into Film. Available at: https://fashionintofilm.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/within-and-without-the-great-gatsbys-3d-experience/
Elsaesser, T. 2013. The ‘Return’ of 3-D: On Some of the Logics and Genealogies of the Image in the Twenty-First Century. Critical Inquiry 29(2): 217–246.
Fitzgerald, F.S. 2000. The Great Gatsby. London: Penguin Classics.
Gallafent, E. 2013. Letters and Literacy in Hollywood Film. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Giardina, C. 2013. The Great Gatsby in 3D: What to Watch for. The Hollywood Reporter. Available at: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/behind-screen/great-gatsby-3d-what-watch-520873
Hogan, M. 2013. Baz Luhrmann, Great Gatsby Director, Explains The 3D, The Hip Hop, The Sanitarium and More. The Huffington Post. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/13/baz-luhrmann-great-gatsby_n_3265327.html
Mirzoeff, N. 2011. The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Purse, L. 2013. Digital Imaging in Popular Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Purse, L. 2014. Touching the Void: Orientations and Affective Trajectories in Digital Depth. The Digital in Depth: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on Depth in Digital Media. Held 30 May 2014 at the University of Warwick.
Ross, M. 2011. Spectacular Dimensions: 3D Dance Films. Senses of Cinema, 61. Available at: http://www.sensesofcinema.com/2011/feature-articles/spectacular-dimensions-3d-dance-films/
Tanner, T. 2000. Introduction. In The Great Gatsby, ed. F.S. Fitzgerald. London: Penguin Classics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weetch, O. (2016). ‘There’s an Ocean in the Way’: Written Words, Unreachability and Competing Testimonies in The Great Gatsby . In: Expressive Spaces in Digital 3D Cinema. Palgrave Close Readings in Film and Television. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54267-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54267-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54266-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54267-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)