Advertisement

“Mines aren’t really like that”: German Romantic Undergrounds Revisited

  • Kate Rigby
Chapter
  • 417 Downloads
Part of the Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment book series (LCE)

Abstract

Drawing on contemporary reconceptualizations of materiality as a site of more-than-human mindfulness, meaning, and moral salience, this chapter brings a material ecocritical perspective to bear on the celebration of caverns, mines, and mining in Novalis’s unfinished novel, Heinrich von Ofterdingen. While the German Romantic romance with mining has sometimes been seen as complicit with the emergent extractive economy of industrial modernity, I argue that it is also possible to exhume from Novalis’ literary underground an ecophilosophical ethos of human responsibility for more-than-human flourishing that answers to the socio-ecological exigencies of the present, in which “letting be” is no longer adequate.

Keywords

Blue Flower Industrial Modernity Erotic Love Poetic Imagination Hide Treasure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Works Cited

  1. Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: The Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke UP, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Böhme, Hartmut. “Montan-Bau und Berg-Geheimnisse: Zum Verhältnis von Bergbauwissenschaft und hermeneutischer Naturästhetik bei Novalis.” Idealismus und Aufklärung: Kontinuität und Kritik der Aufklärung in Philosophie und Poesie um 1800, edited by Christoph Jamme and Gerhard Kunz. Klett-Cotta, 1988a, pp. 59–79.Google Scholar
  3. ———. Natur und Subjekt. Suhrkamp, 1988b.Google Scholar
  4. Classen, Albrecht. “Terra Incognita? Mountains in Medieval and Early Modern German Literature.” Heights of Reflection: Mountains in the German Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Twenty-First Century, edited by Sean Ireton and Caroline Schaumann. Camden House, 2012, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar
  5. Frost, Sabine. “Entwilderung vs. Rewilding: Der orphische Künstler als Vermittler zwischen Mensch und Natur.” Literatur für Leser, vol 35, no. 3, 2012, pp. 173–187.Google Scholar
  6. Gold, Helmut. Erkenntnisse unter Tage: Bergbaumotive in der Literatur der Romantik. Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. Hegener, Johannes. Die Poetisierung der Wissenschaften bei Novalis: Studie zum Problem enzyklopädischen Welterfahrens. Bouvier, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Heringman, Noah. Romantic Rocks, Aesthetic Geology. Cornell UP, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Iovino, Serenella and Serpil Oppermann. Material Ecocriticism. Indiana UP, 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Jamme, Christoph. “Aufklärung via Mythologie: Zum Zusammenhang von Naturbeherrschung und Naturfrömmigkeit um 1800.” Idealismus und Aufklärung: Kontinuität und Kritik der Aufklärung in Philosophie und Poesie um 1800, edited by Christoph Jamme and Gerhard Kunz. Klett-Cotta, 1988a, pp. 35–58.Google Scholar
  11. ——— and Gerhard Kunz (eds). Idealismus und Aufklärung: Kontinuität und Kritik der Aufklärung in Philosophie und Poesie um 1800. Klett-Cotta, 1988b.Google Scholar
  12. Hodkinson, James R. Women and Writing in the Works of Novalis: Transformation beyond Measure? Camden House, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Mahoney, Dennis. “Human History as Natural History in Die Lehrlinge zu Sais and Heinrich von Ofterdingen.” Subversive Sublimities: Undercurrents of the German Enlightenment, edited by Eitel Timm. Camden House, 1992, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  14. ———. The Critical Fortunes of a Romantic Novel: Novalis’ Heinrich von Ofterdingen. Camden House, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. ———. Die Poetisierung der Natur bei Novalis: Beweggründe, Gestaltung, Folgen. Bouvier, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. ———. “Novalis.” The Literary Encyclopedia, first published 7 September 2004, http://www.litencyc.com/php/speople.php?rec=true&UID=1975, accessed 21 July 2015.
  17. Mathews, Freya. For Love of Matter: A Contemporary Panpsychism. SUNY, 2003.Google Scholar
  18. ———. Reinhabiting Reality: Towards a Recovery of Culture. SUNY, 2005.Google Scholar
  19. ———. “Introduction to Ontopoetics’, Philosophy Activism Nature, no. 6, 2006a, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  20. ———. “The World Hidden Within the World: A Conversation on Ontopoetics.” Philosophy Activism Nature, no. 6, 2006b, pp. 97–109.Google Scholar
  21. Molnár, Geza von. Romantic Vision, Ethical Context: Novalis and Artistic Autonomy. U of Minnesota P, 1987.Google Scholar
  22. Nassar, Dalia. The Romantic Absolute: Being and Knowing in German Romantic Philosophy 1795–1804. Chicago UP, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. Novalis. Schriften: Die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs (1960–2006). First edition edited by P. Kluckhohn and R. Samuel, second in 4 vols, with accompanying vol 5, edited by R. Samuel with H-J. Mähl and G. Schulz, and 6.1, edited by H-J. Mähl; 6.2, edited by L. Rommel, and 6.3, edited by G. Rommel and G. Schulz. Kohlhammer, 1960–2006.Google Scholar
  24. Novalis. Schriften: Die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs (1842) Henry of Ofterdingen: A Romance. (Probably) translated by F. S. Stallknecht. John Owen, 1842.Google Scholar
  25. ———. Henry von Ofterdingen. Translated by Palmer Hilty. Ungar, 1964.Google Scholar
  26. ———. Werke. Edited by Gerhard Schulz. Beck, 1969.Google Scholar
  27. Rigby, Kate. Topographies of the Sacred: The Poetics of Place in European Romanticism. U of Virginia P, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. ———. “Art, Nature, and the Poesy of Plants in the Goethezeit: A Biosemiotic Perspective.” Goethe Jahrbuch, vol. 22, no. 1, 2015, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
  29. Roder, Florian. Die Verwandlung des Menschen: Leben und Werk Friedrich von Hardenbergs Urachhaus, 1992.Google Scholar
  30. Sullivan, Heather I. “Ruins and the Construction of Time: Geological and Literary Perspectives in the Age of Goethe.” Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture vol. 30, 2001, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. “Organic and Inorganic Bodies in the Age of Goethe: An Ecocritical Reading of Ludwig Tieck’s ‘Rune Mountain’ and the Earth Sciences.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment vol. 1o, no. 2, 2003, pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
  32. ———. “Dirty Nature: Ecocriticism and Tales of Extraction – Mining and Solar Power – in Goethe, Hoffmann, Verne, and Eschbach.” Colloquia Germanica vol. 44, no.2, 2014, special issue on “Dirty Nature” edited by Heather I. Sullivan and Caroline Schaumann, pp. 133–48.Google Scholar
  33. Schulz, Gerhard. Die Berufstätigkeit Friedrich von Hardenbergs und ihre Bedeutung für seine Dichtung. Diss., University of Leipzig, 1958.Google Scholar
  34. ———. Novalis: Leben und Werk Friedrich von Hardenbergs. Beck, 2012.Google Scholar
  35. Uerlings, Herbert. Friedrich von Hardenberg, genannt Novalis: Werk und Forschung. Metzler, 1991.Google Scholar
  36. ——— (ed.). Novalis und die Wissenschaften. Niemeyer, 1997.Google Scholar
  37. Wanning, Berberli, Novalis zur Einführung. Junius, 1996.Google Scholar
  38. Ziolkowski, Theodore. German Romanticism and Its Institutions. Princeton UP, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Rigby
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Bath SpaBathUK

Personalised recommendations