Advertisement

The Dark Pastoral: A Trope for the Anthropocene

  • Heather I. Sullivan
Chapter
Part of the Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment book series (LCE)

Abstract

This chapter addresses the challenges of portraying radically altered ecological systems as a human story in an era of global anthropogenic impact, exploring how to combine traditional literary tropes like the pastoral with more recent forms such as climate fiction. The dark pastoral trope builds on the pastoral’s long and rich, albeit problematic, literary tradition featuring human beings in highly aestheticized landscapes and re-contextualizes it within the Anthropocene’s dark drama of floods, earthquakes, storms, nuclear explosions, and climate change. Texts such as Goethe’s Werther, Kleist’s Earthquake in Chili, Storm’s The Dykemaster, Pausewang’s The Cloud, and Trojanow’s The Lamentations of Zeno posit various pastoral moments only to rupture and re-shape them with disasters that nevertheless highlight the human enmeshment with the non-human.

Keywords

Nuclear Explosion Rural Landscape Cruise Ship White Horse Traditional Pastoral 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Works Cited

  1. Barrett, Ross, and Daniel Worden, eds. Oil Culture. U of Minnesota P, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Blackbourn, David. The Conquest of Nature: Water, Landscape, and the Making of Modern Germany. Norton, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Belknap of Harvard UP, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Carson, Rachel.Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin, 1962.Google Scholar
  5. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses,”Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, 2009, pp. 197–222.Google Scholar
  6. Crutzen, Paul J., and Eugene F. Stoermer. “The ‘Anthropocene.’”Global Change Newsletter, vol. 41, 2000, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  7. DeLoughrey, Elizabeth, and George B. Handley, eds. Postcolonial Ecologies: Literatures of the Environment. Oxford UP, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Droste Hülshoff, Annette von. Die Judenbuche.Sämtliche Werke: Prosa, edited by Bodo Plachta and Winfried Woesler, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1998, pp. 11–62.Google Scholar
  9. Dürbeck, Gabriele, Caroline Schaumann, and Heather I. Sullivan, “Human and Non-Human Agencies: The Anthropocene, Material Ecocriticism, and the Contributions of Literature.”Ecozon@, vol. 6, no. 1, 2015, pp. 118–36.Google Scholar
  10. Farrier, David. “Toxic Pastoral: Comic Failure and Ironic Nostalgia in Contemporary British Environmental Theatre.”Journal of Ecocriticism, vol. 6, no. 2, 2014, pp. 1–15;Google Scholar
  11. Garrard, Greg.Ecocriticism. Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
  12. ———. “Radical Pastoral?”Studies in Romanticism, vol. 35, no. 3, 1996, pp. 449–465.Google Scholar
  13. Gifford, Terry.Pastoral. Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
  14. ———. “Pastoral, Anti-Pastoral, and Post-Pastoral.” The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Environment, edited by Louise Westling, Cambridge UP, 2014, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
  15. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Die Leiden des jungen Werthers. Edited by Waltraud Wiethölter, Klassiker, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. ———. The Sorrows of Young Werther. Translated by Victor Lange, Suhrkamp, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. Gray, Richard T. “Red Herrings and Blue Smocks: Ecological Destruction, Commercialism, and Anti-Semitism in Annette von Droste-Hülshoff’s Die Judenbuche.”German Studies Review, vol. 26, no. 3, 2003, pp. 515–542.Google Scholar
  18. Heise, Ursula K. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet. Oxford UP, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Hildenbrand, Zacariah Louis, Doug D. Carlton, et al. “A Comprehensive Analysis of Groundwater Quality in the Barnett Shale Region.” Environmental Science and Technology, 17 June 2015. 1–27.Google Scholar
  20. Hilter, Ken. What Else is Pastoral?: Renaissance Literature and the Environment. Cornell UP, 2011.Google Scholar
  21. Huggan, Graham, and Helen Tiffin. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
  22. Iovino, Serenella, and Serpil Oppermann, eds. Material Ecocriticism. U of Virginia P, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. Kleist, Heinrich von. Das Erdbeben in Chili. Heinrich von Kleist: Werke in einem Band, edited by Helmut Sembdner, Carl Hanser, 1990, pp. 687–99.Google Scholar
  24. ———. The Earthquake in Chile. The Marquise of O—And Other Stories. Translated by David Luke and Nigel Reeves, Penguin, 1978, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
  25. Kolbert, Elizabeth. The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. Henry Holt, 2014.Google Scholar
  26. Latham, Rob. “Biotic Invasions: Ecological Imperialism in New Wave Science Fiction.” The Yearbook of English Studies, vol. 37, no. 2, 2007, pp. 103–19.Google Scholar
  27. LeMenager, Stephanie.Living Oil: Petroleum Culture in the American Century. Oxford UP, 2014.Google Scholar
  28. McSweeney, Joeyelle. “The Necropastoral is a political-aesthetic zone in which the fact of mankind’s depredations cannot be separated from an experience of “nature” which is poisoned, mutated, aberrant, spectacular, full of ill effects and affects….” http://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2014/04/what-is-the-necropastoral/; accessed 15 July, 2014.
  29. Morton, Timothy.The Ecological Thought. Harvard UP, 2010.Google Scholar
  30. Neumark, Georg. Fortgepflantzter musikalisch-poetischer Lustwald. Georg Sengenwald, 1657. Google Books, accessed 15 Feb, 2016.Google Scholar
  31. Nixon, Rob.Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard UP, 2011.Google Scholar
  32. Pausewang, Gudrun. Die Wolke. Ravensburger Buchverlag 1989.Google Scholar
  33. Rigby Kate. “Of Mice and Men and Aquatic Flows: Distributed Agency in Theodor Storm’s Der Schimmelreiter.” New German Critique, vol. 128, 2016, pp. 153–76.Google Scholar
  34. Plumwood, Val. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
  35. Raabe, Wilhelm. “Pfisters Mühle.” Sämtliche Werke, vol. 16. Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1970.Google Scholar
  36. Roos, Bonnie, and Alex Hunt, eds.Postcolonial Green : Environmental Politics and World Narratives. U of Virginia P, 2010.Google Scholar
  37. Shiva, Vandana.Soil not Oil. South End Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  38. Storm, Theodor. “Der Schimmelreiter.” Der Schimmelreiter und andere Novellen, edited by Hartmut Vinçon, Goldmann, 1979, pp. 164–274.Google Scholar
  39. ———. The Dyke Master. Translated by Denis Jackson, Angel Books, 1996.Google Scholar
  40. Sullivan, Heather I. “Material Ecocriticism and the Petro-Text.” The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities, edited by Ursula K. Heise, et al., Routledge, forthcoming, 2017: 414–423.Google Scholar
  41. ———. “Nature and the ‘Dark Pastoral’ in Goethe’s Werther.Goethe Yearbook, vol. 22, 2015, pp. 115–32Google Scholar
  42. Trexler, Adam. Anthropocene Fictions: The Novel in a Time of Climate Change. U of Virginia P, 2015.Google Scholar
  43. Trojanow, Ilija.EisTau. Carl Hanser, 2011.Google Scholar
  44. ———. The Lamentations of Zeno. Verso, 2016.Google Scholar
  45. Weber, Christoph.Gottesgericht zur verhängnisvollen Natur: Darstellung und Bewältigung von Naturkatastrophen im 18. Jahrhundert. Felix Meiner Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar
  46. Weingarten, M., et al. “High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity.” Sciencemag.org, vol. 348.6241, June 2015, pp. 1336–440.Google Scholar
  47. Wilke, Sabine. “Pollution as Poetic Practice: Glimpses of Modernism in Wilhelm Raabe’s Pfisters Mühle.” Colloquia Germanica, vol. 44, no. 2, 2011, pp. 195–214.Google Scholar
  48. Wolf, Christa.Störfall: Nachrichten eines Tages. Luchterhand, 1987.Google Scholar
  49. Wordsworth, William. “Michael: A Pastoral Poem.” Bartleby.com: Great Books Online. 1993–2015. http://www.bartleby.com/41/372.html.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather I. Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Trinity UniversitySan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations