Skip to main content

Al-Kindi and the Rise of Falsafa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Analytic Islamic Philosophy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Philosophy Today ((PPT))

  • 474 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we introduce the thought of al-Kindi—almost unanimously taken to be the first of the great Falasifa—and present him as a successful salesperson for Falsafa in the Muslim world. Even if his arguments are not all entirely successful, they are all ingenious. We present his thought as unified under the banner of what we call Evidentialism—a thesis that later became an axiom of the Enlightenment and, which, along with his take on Greek philosophy set the rough contours of, and opened a fertile intellectual terrain to, the ensuing tradition of Falsafa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “rightly guided” Caliphs are those four or three who immediately followed Muhammad, and were either close companions of his, or his genetic descendants. Here, of course, is where the split between Sunni and Shiite Islam occurs—the former acknowledging the Prophet’s nephew ‘Ali as a legitimate Caliph, and maintaining that the Caliphate should have been hereditary in the first instance (‘Ali the only hereditary candidate was not immediately installed as Caliph), while the Sunnis deny this.

  2. 2.

    For an account of why this might have been politically expedient, see Gutas (1998).

  3. 3.

    Incidentally, we do not know the chronology of al-Kindi’s works. All we have of his works are collected in one single manuscript discovered by Helmut Ritter and which is now held in Istanbul. We know that he wrote other works from a contemporary book-merchant’s book list, but again we do not know the chronology of them.

  4. 4.

    According to which knowledge is justified, True Belief. See of course Gettier (1963) for an attack and articulation of that view, which he attributes to Plato ; though see Antognazza (2015) for an argument for why that was not Plato ’s view.

  5. 5.

    I take the coffee example from Linda Zagzebski (2003).

  6. 6.

    Though recall the controversy as to what exactly Aristotle meant by “substance”.

  7. 7.

    Time, according to Aristotle in the Physics, enumerates motion and so change.

References

Secondary Sources

  • Adamson, P. 2007a. Al-Kindī. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. Knowledge of Universals and Particulars in the Baghdad School. Documenti e Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievele 18: 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antognazza, M.R. 2015. The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of Its History. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1): 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonjour, L. 1986. Empirical Knowledge. Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, W.K. 1877[1999]. The Ethics of Belief. In The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays, ed. T. Madigan. Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, E. 1963. Is Knowledge Justified True Belief. Analysis 23 (6): 121–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. 1998. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early Society. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr, S.H. 2006. Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present: Philosophy in the Land of Prophecy. SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. 1981. Faith and Reason. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. 2003. The Search for the Source of Epistemic Good. Metaphilosophy 34: 12–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Booth, A.R. (2017). Al-Kindi and the Rise of Falsafa. In: Analytic Islamic Philosophy. Palgrave Philosophy Today. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54157-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics