Abstract
In Southeast Asia, the military’s role in transition has been prominent, particularly in the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, and Myanmar. In coalition with civilian opposition groups, reformist factions within the military helped usher a period of transition. In contrast, autocratic rulers in the MENA region were able to employ brutal force in attempts to crush revolts because rather than sidelining the military, they had ensured that key units were commanded by members of the ruling family, tribe, or sect. This gave those well-trained and well-armed units a vested interest in maintaining the status quo and effectively neutralized the risk and/or fallout of potential defections in times of crisis. It also cemented the family, tribe, or sect’s grip on power. The sharp contrasts in the role of the military during transition periods and the different outcomes for individual countries is the highlight of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosario, T.Cd., Dorsey, J.M. (2016). To Shoot or Not to Shoot: The Military in Political Transitions. In: Comparative Political Transitions between Southeast Asia and the Middle East and North Africa. The Modern Muslim World. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54089-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54089-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54348-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54089-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)