Skip to main content

Enforcement and Professional Constructions of Environmental Crime in Finland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Geography of Environmental Crime

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology ((PSGC))

Abstract

In Finland, the awakening to the need for more efficient prevention of environmental crime has been relatively slow; it has generally been assumed that environmental crime is not a particularly severe problem. Only recently, after a few corporations were found to have committed aggravated impairment of the environment, has awareness of the issue arisen. Hence, during recent years, several actions have been taken by authorities to address environmental crime (Ministry of the Environment 2015; Finnish National Monitoring Group 2015; Sahramäki & Kankaanranta 2014b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information on hidden crime in Finland, see Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos (2014).

  2. 2.

    In Sweden, the strategy was seen as a useful policy document to promote the prevention of environmental crime and the enforcement of environmental legislation. For more information on the implementation of the strategy see Sahramäki et al. (2015); Rikspolisstyrelsen (2013); Skagerö & Korsell (2006); Sahramäki & Kankaanranta (2014a).

References

  • Aakkula, T. (2001). Ympäristörikokset alueellisten ympäristökeskusten käsittelyssä [Supervision of environmental crime in regional environmental inspection authorities]. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen moniste 222 Helsinki: Ympäristökeskus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahonen, T., Kerppilä, L., & Pirjatanniemi, E. (2003). ’Ilmoittaako vai eikö? Arvioita kunnan ympäristöviranomaisen ilmoituskynnyksestä ympäristörikosjutuissa [Report or not to report? Evaluation of crime reporting by environmental inspection authorities]. Oikeus, 32(4), 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Women, policy and politics. The construction of policy problems. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bihari Axelsson, S., & Axelsson, R. (2009). From territoriality to altruism in interprofessional collaboration and leadership. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(4), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Comte, F. (2006). Environmental crime and the police in Europe: A panorama and possible paths for future action. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 15, 190–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crank, J. P. (2003). Institutional theory of police: A review of the state of the art. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26(2), 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crofts, P., Morris, T., Wells, K., & Powell, A. (2010). Illegal dumping and crime prevention: A case study of Ash Road, Liverpool Council. The Journal of Law and Social Justice, 5, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Rées, H. (2001). Can criminal law protect the environment? Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 2, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, A., & Watson, M. (2004). Organizations and environmental crime: Legal and economic perspectives. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19, 741–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure, M. G., & Visser, M. (2004). Law and economics of environmental crime. In H. Sjögren & G. Skogh (Eds.), New perspectives on economic crime (pp. 57–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnish National Monitoring Group. (2013). Ympäristörikoskatsaus vuodelta 2012 [Environmental crime in 2012]. Helsinki: Poliisihallitus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnish National Monitoring Group. (2014). Ympäristörikoskatsaus vuodelta 2013 [Environmental Offences in Finland 2012]. Helsinki: Poliisihallitus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnish National Monitoring Group. (2015). Ympäristörikoskatsaus vuodelta 2014 [Environmental crime in 2012]. Helsinki: Poliisihallitus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2004). Strong opposition: Frame-based resistance to collaboration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J., & van de Graaf, H. (1996). Technology, Assessment as Learning. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21(1), 72–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2014). The construction of librarians’ professional identities: A discourse analysis. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 38(4), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M. and Jang, J. (2013).’ NIMBY or NIABY? Who defines a policy problem and why: Analysis of framing in raioactive waste disposal facility placement in South Korea’. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 54(1), 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, M. A. (2012). The communicative contitution of collective identity in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, D., and Rein, M. (2003). Reframing practice. In M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 172–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of the Environment. (2015). Ympäristörikostorjunnan strategia ja toimenpideohjelma. Yhteistyöryhmän ehdotus [Strategy and action plan for prevention of environmental crime]. Ympäristöministeriön raportteja 16 Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Investigation. (2007). LOKKI-projekti. Loppuraportti [Project LOKKI. Final report]. Vantaa: Keskusrikospoliisi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissinen, M. (2003). Ympäristörikoksista käytännössä [Environmental crimes and the practice]. Defensor Legis, 4, 620–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos. (2014). Rikollisuustilanne 2013. Rikollisuus ja seuraamusjärjestelmä tilastojen valossa [Crime and criminal justice in Finland]. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pralle, S., & Boscarino, J. (2011). Framing trade-offs: The politics of nuclear power and wind energy in the age of global climate change. Review of Policy Research, 28(4), 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puonti, A. (2003). Collaboration as a learning challenge: Constructing a common understanding between police officers and tax inspectors. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 4(2), 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puonti, A. (2004). Tools for collaboration: Using and designing tools in interorganizational economic-crime investigation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rikspolisstyrelsen. (2013). Polismyndigheternas hantering av miljöbrott. Tillsynsrapport 2013:6 [Processing of environmental crime in the Police. Monitoring report 2013:6]. Stockholm: Rikspolisstyrelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikspolisstyrelsen and Ã…klagarmyndigheten. (2010). Strategier mot miljöbrott. Ett samarbetsprojekt mellan Rikspolisstyrelsen och Riksenheten for miljö- och arbetsmiljömÃ¥l. Stockholm: Rikospolisstyrelsen/Ã…klagarmyndigheten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahramäki, I. and Kankaanranta, T. (2014a). Vihreämpää rajan toisella puolella? Vertaileva tutkimus ympäristörikollisuuden torjunnasta ja tutkinnasta Suomessa ja Ruotsissa [Greener across the border? Comparative study on prevention and investigation of environmental crime in Finland and Sweden]. Tampere: Police University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahramäki, I. and Kankaanranta, T. (2014b). Ympäristörikollisuuden torjunta ja valvonta Suomessa—kohti vihreämpää viranomaisyhteistyötä? [Prevention and surveillance of environmental crimes in Finland—Towards greener cooperation between authorities?]. Tampere: Police University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahramäki, I., Korsell, L., & Kankaanranta, T. (2015). Prevention of environmental crime through enforcement—Finland and Sweden compared. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 16(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., & Kearins, K. (2011). Interorganizational collaboration for regional sustainability: What happens when organizational representatives come together? Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 47(2), 168–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Situ, Y., & Emmons, D. (2000). Environmental crime. The criminal justice system’s role in protecting the environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skagerö, A. and Korsell, L. (2006) Är vi BrÃ¥ pÃ¥ miljöbrott? En snabbanalys [Are we good in environmental crime? Short analysis]. Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rÃ¥det.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, B. (2004). The greening and governance of crime control. Criminal Justice, 4, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valtioneuvosto. (2012). Valtioneuvoston periaatepäätös hallituksen toimintaohjelmaksi talousrikollisuuden ja harmaan talouden vähentämiseksi vuosina 2012–2015. 19.1.2012. [Governmental Action Plan to Reduce Economic Crime and the Shadow Economy 2012–2015. 19.1.2012]. Helsinki: Valtioneuvosto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackerhausen, S. (2009). Collaboration, professional identity and reflection across boundaries. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(5), 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2008). Crimes against nature. Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2014). Green criminology. An introduction to the study of environmental harm. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, F. (2013). ‘Not easily put into a box’: Constructing professional identity. Social Work Education, 32(7), 854–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sahramäki, I. (2016). Enforcement and Professional Constructions of Environmental Crime in Finland. In: Potter, G., Nurse, A., Hall, M. (eds) The Geography of Environmental Crime. Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53843-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53843-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53842-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53843-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics