Abstract
René Girard was not a philosopher; nor did he ever claim (or want) to be one. Consequently, he never thoroughly worked out an epistemological theory or framework. Nor did he identify himself as a Catholic theologian, preferring to be known as a researcher in the social sciences, with a particular interest in the anthropology of religion. So it may seem odd to consider the question of an epistemology of revelation in his thought, given that he rarely wrote specifically on epistemological themes (and never in an extended fashion), and did not develop a comprehensive theology of revelation (although he frequently discussed the Bible). Nevertheless, despite the relative absence of an extended and specific treatment of these topics in his writings, Girard’s work has profound implications with regard to our understanding of revelation in the Bible and the consequences of this revelation for human knowing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Reading
Alison, James. The Joy of Being Wrong. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1998.
Bertonneau, Thomas F. “The Logic of the Undecidable: An Interview with Rene Girard.” Paroles Gelées 5 (1987), 15–16.
Ranieri, John. Disturbing Revelation: Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin, and the Bible. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ranieri, J. (2017). An Epistemology of Revelation. In: Alison, J., Palaver, W. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Mimetic Theory and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53825-3_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53825-3_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55280-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53825-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)