Abstract
Claude Lévi-Strauss has developed the structuralist methodology of myths on the basis of which Pierre Bourdieu has developed a sociological analysis of patterns of power and domination. This methodology can be used to analyse contemporary myths of world politics. Goetze’s chapter retraces Lévi-Strauss’ structuralist methodology and Bourdieu’s post-structuralist critique in order to show their contributions to the analysis of power and discourse in contemporary world politics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319–363.
Adler, E. (2005). Communitarian international relations. The epistemic foundations of international relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36.
Angermüller, J. (2007). Qu’est-ce que le poststructuralisme Français? A propos de la notion de discours d’un pays à l’autre. Langage et société, 120, 17–34.
Barthes, R. (1966). Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits. Communications, 8(8), 1–27.
Bigo, D. (2011). Pierre bourdieu and international relations: Power of practices, practices of power. International Political Sociology, 5(3), 225–258.
Bliesemann de Guevara, B., & Kühn, F. P. (2015). On Afghan footbaths and sacred cows in Kosovo: Urban legends of intervention. Peacebuilding, 3(1), 17–35.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Sens pratique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire: l’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (2000 [1972]). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d’ethnologie kabyle. Paris: Points Essais.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Esquisse pour une auto-analyse. Paris: Éditions Raisons d’agir.
Checkel, J. T. (2004). Social constructivisms in global and European politics: A review essay. Review of International Studies, 30(2), 229–244.
de Saussure, F. (2011). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Doniger, W. (2011). The implied spider: Politics and theology in myth (Updated ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Drumbl, M. A. (2012). Reimagining child soldiers in international law and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dundes, A. (1997). Binary opposition in myth: The Propp/Lévi-Strauss debate in retrospect. Western Folklore, 56(1), 39–50.
Epstein, C. (2008). The power of words in international relations: Birth of an anti-whaling discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eribon, D., & Collin, P. (1988). Claude Lévi-Strauss. Réflexions faites. Video. Accessed June 7, 2015, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hStPQRsW7Y
Guzzini, S. (2000). A reconstruction of constructivism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147–182.
Guzzini, S. (2013). Power. In R. Adler-Nissen (Ed.), Bourdieu in international relations. Rethinking key concepts in IR (pp. 78–92). London: Routledge.
Hansen, L. (2013). Security as practice: Discourse analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge. Kindle edition.
Jackson, P. T. (2011). The conduct of inquiry in international relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: Routledge.
Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lapid, Y. (1989). The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-posivist era. International Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 235–254.
Leander, A. (2006). The ‘realpolitik of reason’: Thinking international relations through fields, habitus and practice (Working paper no. 83). Copenhagen Business School and University of Southern Denmark.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955). The structural study of myth. The Journal of American Folklore, 68(270), 428–444.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1979). Myth and meaning. New York: Schocken Books.
Lévy, J. (2007). Globalization as a political invention: Geographical lenses. Political Geography, 26(1), 13–19.
Neumann, I. B. (2012). At home with the diplomats: Inside a European foreign ministry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Pupavac, V. (2012). Language rights: From free speech to linguistic governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosenberg, J. (2006). Why is there no international historical sociology? European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 307–340.
Segal, R. A. (Ed.). (1996). Structuralism in myth: Lévi-Strauss, Barthes, Dumézil, and Propp. New York: Garland Publishing.
Segal, R. A. (2004). Myth. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swartz, D. L. (2013). Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: The political sociology of pierre bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wiener, A. (2008). The invisible constitution of politics: Contested norms and international encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goetze, C. (2016). Bringing Claude Lévi-Strauss and Pierre Bourdieu Together for a Post-structuralist Methodology to Analyse Myths. In: Bliesemann de Guevara, B. (eds) Myth and Narrative in International Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53752-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53752-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53751-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53752-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)