Advertisement

Arctic Policy of South Korea (Republic of Korea)

Chapter
  • 334 Downloads

Abstract

Despite its recent entry into the Arctic arena, South Korea envisages itself as a future Polar leading nation with an official Arctic policy that aims to strengthen international cooperation, scientific research activities, and Arctic business. Supported by the chaebol big business groups, Korea openly expresses its interest in exploring commercial opportunities in the Arctic. Korea attempts to kill many birds with one stone; Korean modern technologies can be used to solve environmental problems in the Arctic while boosting the Korean domestic economy, thereby enhancing Korea’s international profile. Meanwhile, Korea’s ability to swiftly adapt to changing internal and external environments, newly established or adjusted policies and institutions can lack a holistic view on the matter to be tackled, as, for example, tensions over maritime safety policy show.

Keywords

South Korea Arctic policy Green Growth Non-Arctic Observers Maritime safety 

References

  1. 18th Presidential Transition Committee. 2013. Park Geun-Hye’s Vision and Goals.Google Scholar
  2. Bae, Sung-Ho. 2013. Korea’s Energy Security and Arctic Opportunities: Focusing on Oil and Gas. Reykyavik, Iceland: Arctic Circle Assembly.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, Mia. 2013. South Korean Icebreaker Leads Expedition to Canada’s Beaufort Sea for Methane Hydrates. Accessed 1.2.2016. http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2013/09/30/south-korean-icebreaker-leads-expedition-to-canadas-beaufort-sea-for-methane-hydrates/
  4. Choe, Sang-Hun. 2014. Dozens Missing After South Korean Trawler Sinks in Bering Sea. The New York Times. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/02/world/asia/south-korean-trawler-sinks-in-bering-sea.html
  5. Choi, Kyung-Sik, and Seong-Cheol Cho. 2003. The Northern Sea Route and Operation of Icebreaking Cargo Ships [in Korean]. Journal of the Korean Society of Ocean Engineers 17(6).Google Scholar
  6. Dent, Christopher M. 2003. Transnational Capital, the State and Foreign Economic Policy: Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Review of International Political Economy 10(2): 246–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. encana. 2012. Encana Generates Third Quarter Cash Flow of US$1.2. Billion, or $1.57 Per Share. Accessed 16.2.2016. https://www.encana.com/news-stories/news-releases/details.html?release=627288
  8. Gong, Keyu. 2015. The Cooperation and Competition between China, Japan and South Korea in the Arctic. In Asian Countries and the Arctic Frontiers, ed. Leiv Lunde, Jian Yang, and Iselin Stensdal, 237–254. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horlings, L.G., and T.K. Marsden. 2011. Towards the Real Green Revolution? Exploring the Conceptual Dimensions of a New Ecological Modernization of Agriculture That Could ‘Feed the World’. Global Environmental Change 21(2): 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang, Sehee. 2015. Improvement of South Korea’s Maritime Safety System After the Sinking of MV Sewol [in Japanese]. From the Oceans (19 January 2015).Google Scholar
  11. John, Jojin V. 2014. Becoming and Being a Middle Power: Exploring a New Dimension of South Korea’s Foreign Policy. China Report 50(4): 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalinowski, Thomas, and Hyekyung Cho. 2012. Korea’s Search for a Global Role between Hard Economic Interests and Soft Power. European Journal of Development Research 24: 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, Jong Deog. 2014a. Overview of Korea’s Arctic Policy Development. Strategic Analysis 38(6): 917–923.Google Scholar
  14. Kim, Tong-Hyung. 2014b. Fears Rise for Over 50 Missing from South Korean Ship. Alaska Dispatch News. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.adn.com/article/20141202/fears-rise-over-50-missing-south-korean-ship
  15. Kim, Samuel. 2002. Korea in the World Community. West Nyack, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, Sun-Bin. 2013. Directions and Tasks for Park Geun-Hye’s Economic Policies. SERI Quarterly (July 2013): 22–29.Google Scholar
  17. KOGAS Canada Ltd. 2012. HOME ABOUT—Business Activities. Accessed 1.2.2016. http://www.kogascanada.com
  18. Korea Economic Institute of America. 2011. Korea’s Economy 2011. Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Korea International Trade Association. 2016. Status of the Korean FTAs [in Korean]. Korea International Trade Association. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://okfta.kita.net/ftaInfo.do?method=korStatus
  20. Korean Polar Research Institute. 2016. Korean Research IceBreaker. Accessed 1.2.2016. http://eng.kopri.re.kr/home_e/contents/e_3400000/view.cms
  21. Lee, Seo-Hang. 2012. Comments on Chapter 2: Korean Perspective. In The Arctic in World Affairs: A North Pacific Dialogue on Arctic Maritime Issues 2012 North Pacific Arctic Conference Proceedings, edited by Oran R. Young, Jong Deog Kim, and Yoon Hyung Kim, 94–96. Seoul and Honolulu: Korea Maritime Institute and East-West Center.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, Byong-hyun. 2013a. Korea’s Arctic Policy: A Korean Route Towards the Arctic Frontier. Arctic Frontiers 2013, Tromsø, Norway.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, Seong-Min. 2013b. Korean Perspective. In The Arctic in World Affairs: A North Pacific Dialogue on the Future of the Arctic North Pacific Arctic Conference Proceedings 2013, edited by Oran R. Young, Jong Deog Kim, and Yoon Hyung Kim, 206–212. Seoul and Honolulu: Korea Maritime Institute and East-West Center.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, Sung Woo. 2013c. Comments on Chapter 2: Korean Perspective. In The Arctic in World Affairs: A North Pacific Dialogue on the Future of the Arctic North Pacific Arctic Conference Proceedings 2013, edited by Oran R. Young, Jong Deog Kim, and Yoon Hyung Kim, 110–114. Seoul and Honolulu: Korea Maritime Institute and East-West Center.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, Sung-Woo, and Gun-Sub Kim. 2009. Port Challenge in Northeast Asia: Korea’s Two-Hub Port Strategy. In Ports in Proximity: Competition and Coordination among Adjacent Seaports, ed. Theo Notteboom, César Ducruet, and Peter de Langen, 247–260. Farnham, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. McCurry, Justin. 2014. More Than 270 Missing as Ferry Sinks Off the Coast of South Korea. The Guardian. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/16/rescuers-battle-to-save-476-passengers-after-ferry-sinks-off-south-korea
  27. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries Republic of Korea. 2014. Korea Shipping Liner, Hyundai Glovis, Successful Pilot Operation through the Northern Sea Route.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2016. About MOF: History. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.mof.go.kr/eng/content/view.do?menuKey=491&contentKey=28
  29. OAO Gazprom. 2008. Gazprom and Kogas sign Memorandum of Understanding. Accessed 1.2.2016. http://www.gazprom.com/press/news/2008/september/article64308/
  30. Park, Young Kil. 2014. Arctic Prospects and Challenges from a Korean Perspective. In East Asia-Arctic Relations: Boundary, Security and International Politics, edited by Kimie Hara and Ken Coates, 47–60. Waterloo, Canada: The Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
  31. RT. 2014. Russia to Extend Trans-Eurasian Rail Project to Korea. Accessed 1.2.2016. https://www.rt.com/business/164116-russia-railway-north-korea/
  32. Seok, Jun-hwan, and Oi-hyun Kim. 2014. [Analysis] Pres. Park’s Sewol Address: Apology and High-Handed Measures. The Hankyoreh Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/637971.html
  33. The Korea Economic Daily. 2015. The Arctic, Economic Opportunities and the Stage of Global Cooperation [in Korean]. The Korea Economic Daily. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.hankyung.com/news/app/newsview.php?aid=2015072036881
  34. The Ocean Policy Research Foundation. 2014. Trends of Ocean Policies in Various Countries and International Society [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Ocean Policy Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  35. The Telegraph. 2009. German Ships Sailing through North East Passage. Accessed 1.2.2016. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/6176989/German-ships-sailing-through-North-East-Passage.html
  36. Tonami, Aki, and Anders Riel Müller. 2014. Trajectories of Japanese and South Korean Environmental Aid: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Journal of Environment & Development 23(2): 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United Nations Environment Programme. 2010. Overview of the Republic of Korea’s National Strategy for Green Growth Strategy. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  38. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2016. Parties & Observers. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://unfccc.int/parties_and_observers/items/2704.php
  39. United Nations Sustsainable Development Knowledge Platform. 2015. Green Growth. Accessed 2.2.2016. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?menu=1447
  40. VOR. 2015. South Korea: A View of a Russian Diplomat [in Japanese]. Accessed 1.2.2016. http://jp.sputniknews.com/japanese.ruvr.ru/2015_02_19/282971628/
  41. Watson, Iain. 2011. Global Korea: Foreign Aid and National Interests in an Age of Globalization. Contemporary Politics 17(1): 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Shipping Council. 2016. Top 50 World Container Ports. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/global-trade/top-50-world-container-ports
  43. Worldyards Statistics. 2016. Overall Ranking Including Offshore. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.worldyardsstatistics.com/ss_allranking.php
  44. Yeon, Young-Jin. 2012. The Direction of the Arctic Policy. The First Policy Forum for an Antarctic Strategy, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  45. Yonhap News Agency. 2014. Ulsan Port Authority Finished the Event ‘The Arctic and the Russian Far East’ [in Korean]. Accessed 2.2.2016. http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/economy/2015/01/21/0302000000AKR20150121154800057.HTML
  46. Yun, Sun-Jin, Sun In Na, and Soocheol Lee. 2012. Korea’s Global Warming Policy and Governance [in Japanese]. The Meijo Review 12(4): 119–129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nordic Institute of Asian StudiesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations