Skip to main content

The Allocation of Savings to VC Funds, Consumers’ Surplus and Life-Cycle Savings Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Venture Capital and the Inventive Process
  • 1012 Accesses

Abstract

The venture capital industry is supply determined. Capital allocation is what makes VC funds work. The focus of this chapter is on the main source of capital to VC funds (institutional investors) and on the question, why do institutional investors allocate capital to VC funds? Pension funds have fiduciary obligations to their beneficiaries. We show in the chapter that allocating a small fraction of the savings of the beneficiaries to “lottery-like” investments that, if successful, will change future consumption in a substantial way is congruent with long-term maximization of the utility of consumption of the savers. Successful, innovative, VC-backed companies increase consumption possibilities both by changing relative prices and by introducing new goods and services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, D., & MacAulay, M. (2000). Estimating future consumers welfare gains from innovation: The case of digital data storage. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodie, Z., Treussard, J., & Willen, P. (2007). The theory of life-cycle saving and investing. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, R. W., Jackson, C. L., & Singer, H. J. (2003). The effects of ubiquitous broadband adoption on investment, jobs, and the U.S. economy. Washington, DC: Criterion Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1990, May). The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. AEA Papers and Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doms, M., & Lewis, E. (2006). Labor supply and personal computer adoption. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 06-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, LVI(4), 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. S., Hsu, D. H., & Stern, S. (2002). When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND Journal of Economics, 33(4), 571–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J., & Stern, S. (2010). Is there a market for ideas. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 805–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. (2001). Financial contracting. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1079–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulten, C. R. (2000). Total factor productivity: A short biography (Working Paper No. 7471). National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2005). Growth and ideas. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. B, pp. 1065–1111). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux, N. L., Levenstein, M., & Sokoloff, K. L. (2006). Finance innovation during the second industrial revolution: Cleveland, Ohio 1870–1890. Capitalism and Society, 1(3), Article 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B. & Balasubramanian, N. (2007). Measuring value creation and its distribution among stakeholders of the firm (Mimeo). Los Angeles, CA: Anderson School of Management, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (2009). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 1(2–3).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute. (2015). Unlocking the potential of internet of things. McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanyan, S., & Fraser, K. (2014, March 20). Should low inflation be a concern? A comprehensive explanation for the current lack of inflationary pressures. U.S. Economic Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. R. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. London: The Free Press, Collier Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. D., McClure C. R., & Mandel, L. H. (2012). Broadband applications: Categories, requirements, and future frameworks. First Monday, 17(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, T. S. (2006). The psychology of novelty-seeking, creativity and innovation: Neurocognitive aspects within a work-psychological perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, A.D. (2000) How free Computers are Filling the Digital Divide. Retrived from: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2000/04/how-free-computers-are-filling-the-digital-divide

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agmon, T., Sjögre, S. (2016). The Allocation of Savings to VC Funds, Consumers’ Surplus and Life-Cycle Savings Model. In: Venture Capital and the Inventive Process. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53660-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics