Skip to main content

The Idea of ‘Marketising’ the University: Against Magical Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Universities, Managerialism and the Value of Higher Education

Part of the book series: Palgrave Critical University Studies ((PCU))

  • 841 Accesses

Abstract

The ascendancy of a neo-liberal frame in higher-education policy dates from the early 1980s. Until then government-supported mass higher education was the ‘dominant template’ both in Europe and the English-speaking countries except for America where the situation was more complex. This template included free tuition and high levels of recurrent budget support for the normal teaching and research functions of universities (Marginson 2004: 179). Then from the 1980s on, neo-liberal policy-makers began to redefine higher education as a higher-education market selling an individual private good: in Australia policy-makers even began to talk about higher education as an ‘export industry’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amaral, A., Meek, V., & Larsen, I. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2007). Education, markets, and an audit culture. International Journal of Educational Policies, 1(1), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D., & Filippetti, A. (2015). Knowledge as global public good. In D. Archibugi & A. Filippetti (Eds.), Handbook of global science, technology and innovation (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2000a). Realising the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2000b). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neoliberalism and rationalities of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, D., Fisher, S., & Dornbusch, R. (1991). Economics (3rd ed.). Sydney: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, K., & Myknenko, V. (2010). Introduction: A world turned upside down. In K. Birch & V. Myknenko (Eds.), The rise and fall of neo-liberalism. London: Zone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (2005). Truth: A guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2011). The march of the market. In N. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketization of higher education and the student as consumer. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2015a). The marketisation of higher education: Issues and ironies. New Vistas, 1(1): 5–9. http://www.uwl.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Departments/Research/new_vistas/vol1_iss1/vol1_iss1_art1_23April2015.pdf

  • Brown, W. (2015b). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge: Zone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Carasso, H. (2015). Everything for sale? The marketisation of UK higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1986). Contractarianism and democracy. In J. Buchanan (Ed.), Liberty, market and state. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G. (1996). Liberal government and techniques of the self. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason (pp. 19–36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2002). Breaking the mould: An institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26, 539–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2013b). Why do market ‘reforms’ persistently increase inequality? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2015). Analysis of Australia’s education exports. Canberra: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. https://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/analysis-of-australias-education-exports.pdf

  • Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: The Gifford Lectures. New York: Minton Balch & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D., Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B., & Amaral, A. (2004). Conclusion. In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, S. (1990). Beyond dualism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14, 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertman, M. (2004). What’s wrong with a parenthood market? A new and improved theory of commodification. North Carolina Law Review, 82(2), 3–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J. (2013). Collected essays: Reason in action (I); Intention and identity(II); Human rights and common good (III); Philosophy of law (IV); Religion and public reasons (V). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foskett, N. (2011). Markets, government, funding and the marketisation of UK higher education. In N. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketization of higher education and the student as consumer. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaita, R. (2012). To civilize the city? Meanjin, 71(1), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The last 5000 years. London: Melville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley-Brown, J. V., & Goonawardana, S. (2007). Brand harmonisation in the international higher education market. Journal of Business Research, 60, 942–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1982). Rival views of market society. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B. (2003). Marketisation in higher education, Clark’s triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, 57, 110–135. doi:10.1111/hequ.2003.57.issue-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1988, September). A general perspective on higher education and service to the labor market. Unpublished paper excerpted in Policy Perspectives, ‘Distillations’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, C. (2014). American postsecondary education: A Prada Handbag or an Irish Potato? Huffpost, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-kolb/american-postsecondary-ed_b_5616827.html

  • Le Grand, J., & Bartlett, W. (Eds.). (1993). Quasi markets and social policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38(3), 599–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1997). Competition and contestability in Australian higher education, 1987–1997. Australian Universities Review, 40(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and markets in higher education: A ‘glonacal’ analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 175–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). Globalisation and higher education (OECD education working papers, no. 8). OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/173831738240/

  • Massy, W. (2004). Markets in higher education: Do they promote internal efficiency? In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1994). Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (2002). The secret sins of economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (1989). More heat than light: Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1936). Socialism: An economic and sociological analysis (trans: Kahane, J.). London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molesworth, M., Scullion, R., & Nixon, E. (Eds.). (2010). The marketisation of higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. October 86 (Autumn): 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, Utopia and the state. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2008b). Tertiary education for the knowledge society. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert, B. (2015). The quality of Australia’s higher education system: How it might be defined, improved and assured. Canberra: Office for Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugsley, L. (1998). Throwing your brains at it: Higher education, markets and choice. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (2014). Post-school education in Australia: The case against deregulation. Submission to Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee inquiry into the Higher Education and Research Reform Act Amendment Bill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, M. (1996). Contested commodities: The trouble with trade in sex, children, body parts and other things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods (pp. 308–325). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (1998). The commoditization conundrum. Slate http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/the_motley_fool/1998/01/the_commoditization_conundrum.html

  • Teixeira, P., & Amaral, A. (2001). Private higher education and diversity: An exploratory survey. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(4), 359–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B., Dill, D., & Amaral, A. (Eds.) (2004). Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W., & Thomas, D. (1929). The child in America. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2016). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (1992). Changing patterns of finance in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watts, R. (2017). The Idea of ‘Marketising’ the University: Against Magical Thinking. In: Public Universities, Managerialism and the Value of Higher Education. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53599-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53599-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53598-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53599-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics