Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Media, Sustainability and Everyday Life pp 111–133Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Eco-Reality Television

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1551 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates those reality television programmes where an environmental theme is foregrounded. It initially discusses the main features of reality television: its representational claims and its production of affect and social integration through the public presentation of what are often more private practices and modes of being. The chapter discusses the roles of the programme hosts and the ordinary participants of reality television shows. An analysis of the eco-build episodes of the popular Grand Designs programme demonstrates that such episodes work to normalise and pluralise sustainable building and lifestyles. A case study of the Aotearoa New Zealand reality television programme, WA$TED! reveals how the show highlights and traces the environmental networks that inform and animate everyday practices and objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised edition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, Frances. 2003. Ordinary Television: Analyzing Popular TV. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratich, Jack. Z. 2007. “Programming Reality: Control Societies, New Subjects and the Powers of Transformation.” In Makeover Television: Realities Remodelled, edited by D. Heller, 6–22. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon, Charlotte. 2003. “Lifestyling Britain: The 8–9 Slot on British Television.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 6 (1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon, Charlotte, C. Johnson, R. Moseley, and H. Wheatley. 2001. “Factual Entertainment on British Television: The Midlands TV Research Group’s ‘8–9 Project’.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 4 (1): 29–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, Nick. 2003. Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, Barbara. 1999. The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escoffery, David S., ed. 2006. How Real Is Reality TV? Essays on Representation and Truth. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, John. 1992. The Politics of Pictures: The Creation of the Public in the Age of Popular Media. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, Dana, ed. 2007. Makeover Television: Realities Remodelled. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Annette. 2005. Reality TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, Melinda. 2012. “House Proud.” The Sydney Morning Herald, September 3. https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/house-proud-20120831-253yg.html.

  • Kavka, Misha. 2008. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment. 2007. “Talk Sustainability.” Issue 4. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/sus-dev/talk-sustainability.

  • Morley, David. 2000. Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Margaret. 1998. Virtualities: Television, Media Art and Cyberculture. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, Jonathan. 2006. Post-structuralist Geography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkins, Wendy, and Geoffrey Craig. 2011. “Slow Living and the Temporalities of Sustainable Consumption.” In Ethical Consumption: A Critical Introduction, edited by Tania Lewis and Emily Potter, 189–201. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scannell, Paddy. 1996. Radio, Television and Modern Public Life. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Lisa. 2002. “From Ways of Life to Lifestyle: The ‘Ordinari-ization’ of British Gardening Lifestyle Television.” European Journal of Communication 17 (4): 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Helen, and Beverley Skeggs. 2011. “Reacting to Reality TV: The Affective Economy of an ‘Extended Social/Public Realm’.” In The Politics of Reality Television: Global Perspectives, edited by Marwan M. Kraidy and Katherine Sender, 93–106. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

    Geoffrey Craig

Authors
  1. Geoffrey Craig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Craig .

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Craig, G. (2019). Eco-Reality Television. In: Media, Sustainability and Everyday Life. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53469-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation