Skip to main content

The Evaluation of Inquiry: The End of the Road?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 9202 Accesses

Abstract

In the inquiry learning context, evaluation takes three forms: the evaluation of thought/conclusion on the basis of data; the evaluation of data validity; and the degree of student understanding of the concepts being learned and utilised in the conduct of the inquiry. Depending upon the style of inquiry taking place, evaluation has different approaches. The experimental approach is essentially scientific in its separation of the inquiry from surrounding reality. Experimental evaluation is inappropriate for educational environments as it does not possess relevance to the educational—and wider—environment in which the learning takes place. The naturalistic approach, used in geographical and historical inquiry, acknowledges that effective learning (and teaching) takes into account the environment in which that inquiry learning takes place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2016). The Australian Curriculum V8.2. Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berriet-Solliec, M., Labarthe, P., & Laurent, C. (2014). Goals of evaluation and types of evidence. Evaluation, 20(2), 195–213. doi:10.1177/1356389014529836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, F. (2003). Inquiry Learning: Teaching for conceptual change in EE. Green Teacher, 71(Summer), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, C. A. (2008). Effective evaluation through appreciative inquiry. Performance Improvement, 47(2), 23–29. doi:10.1002/pfi.181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunsford, E., & Melear, C. T. (2004). Using scoring rubrics to evaluate inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(1), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musoba, G. D. (2006). Using evaluation to close the inquiry loop. New Directions for Institutional Research, 130, 77–94. doi:10.1002/ir.181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. H., Harbsmeier, M., & Ries, C. J. (2012). Studying scientists and scholars in the field: An introduction. In K. H. Nielsen, M. Harbsmeier, & C. J. Ries (Eds.), Studying scientists and scholars in the field: Studies in the history of fieldwork and expeditions (pp. 9–28). Arhus/Kobenhavn, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W. W. (1983). Experimental inquiry and naturalistic inquiry: An evaluation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), 95–103. doi:10.1002/tea.3660200202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian Kidman .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kidman, G., Casinader, N. (2017). The Evaluation of Inquiry: The End of the Road?. In: Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning across Disciplines. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53463-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53463-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53462-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53463-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics