Abstract
This chapter critiques what easily happens when heritage preservation is considered primarily for the purpose of tourist development rather than the needs and values of local residents. The analytic proposed, in two Asian case studies (Macau SAR, China; and Penang, Malaysia) is that houses—so often the key focal point of both preservation projects and heritage narratives—all too often end up cleaned up and emptied out in what amounts to an inappropriately universal modernist emphasis on an objectified material design aesthetic that minimizes lived experiences and identities. Despite good intentions, such projects easily distance heritage away from local uses toward a more general and standardized type of globalized commercialization/commodification of history and culture despite recently widespread efforts to preserve more “intangible” aspects of heritage.
References
Ahmad, Y. (2006). The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(3), 299.
Chen, A. H. (Ed.). (2001). Culture of Metropolis in Macau: An International Symposium on Cultural Heritage Strategies for the Twenty-first Century. Macau: Instituto Cultural do Governo da R.A.E. de Macau.
Chung, T. (2009). Valuing Heritage in Macau: On Contexts and Processes of Urban Conservation. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 38(1), 129–160.
Clayton, C. H. (2009). Sovereignty at the Edge: Macau & the Question of Chineseness. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.
du Cros, H. (2009). Emerging Issues for Cultural Tourism in Macau. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 1, 73–99.
Dewar, K., du Cros, H., & Li, W. (2012). The Search for World Heritage Brand Awareness Beyond the Iconic Heritage: A Case Study of the Historic Centre of Macao. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 7(4), 323–339.
Engelhardt, R. (2004). The Management of World Heritage Cities: Evolving Concepts, New Strategies. In D. Lung (Ed.), The Conservation of Urban Heritage: Macau Vision (pp. 33–48). Macao: Instituto Cultural do Governo da R.A.E. de Macau.
Goh, B. L. (2001). Rethinking Urbanism in Malaysia: Power, Space and Identity. In M. Mohamad & S. K. Wong (Eds.), Risking Malaysia: Culture, Politics and Identity (pp. 159–178). Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Goh, B. L. (2002). Modern Dreams: An Inquiry into Power, Cultural Production, and the Cityscape in Contemporary Urban Penang, Malaysia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Graburn, N. H. H. (2006). Arts of the Fourth World. In H. Morphy & M. Perkins (Eds.), The Anthropology of Art: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hewison, R. (1987). The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline. London: Methuen.
Khoo, S. N. (1993). Streets of George Town. Penang: Areca Books.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1998). Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums and Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Klein, N. (2002). No Space, No Choice, No Jobs, No Logo. New York: Picador.
Loos, A.. (1998; [1930]). Ornament and Crime: Selected Essays. Riverside: Ariadne Press.
Macau Daily Times. (2013, May 24). April: Visitor arrivals up by 0.7 percent year-on-year, p. 7.
Morais, P. (2013). Macau’s Urban Identity Question 1557–1999/2009: Spatializing territory. In C. X. George Wei (Ed.), Macao: The Formation of a Global City. London/New York: Routledge.
Nagata, J. (2001). Heritage as a Site of Resistance: From Architecture to Political Activism in Urban Penang. In M. Mohamad & S. K. Wong (Eds.), Risking Malaysia: Culture, Politics and Identity. Bangi: Penebit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Nasution, K. S., & Jenkins, G. (2002). George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia: Development Strategies and Community Realities. In W. S. Logan (Ed.), The Disappearing ‘Asian’ City: Protecting Asia’s Urban Heritage in a Globalizing World. New York: Oxford University Press.
de Pina-Cabral, J. (2002). Between China and Europe: Persons, Culture and Emotion in Macao. London and New York: Continuum.
de Pina-Cabral, J. (2005). New Age Warriors: Negotiating the Handover on the Streets of Macao. Institute of Germanic & Romance Studies, 5(1), 9–22.
du Plessis, J. (2005). The Growing Problem of Forced Evictions and the Crucial Importance of Community-Based, Locally Appropriate Alternatives. Environment & Urbanization, 17(1), 123–134.
Robertson, I. J. M. (Ed.). (2012). Heritage from Below. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
Smith, L., & Akagawa, N. (Eds.). (2009). Intangible Heritage. London/New York: Routledge.
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO Headquarters.
UNESCO. (2011). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Thirty-fifth session. Paris: UNESCO Headquarters.
UNESCO. (2017). Memory of the World Programme Objectives. http://unesco.org/new/en/communicationand information/memory-of-the-world/about-the-programme/objectives/. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.
Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
Vong, L. T.-N. (2013). An Investigation of the Influence of Heritage Tourism on Local People’s Sense of Place: The Macau Youth’s Experience. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 8(4), 292–302.
Vong, L. T.-N. (2015). The Mediating Role of Place Identity in the Relationship Between Residents’ Perceptions of Heritage Tourism and Place Attachment: The Macau Youth Experience. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 10(4), 344–356.
Wan, P. Y. K., & Pinheiro, F. V. (2014). Macau’s Tourism Planning Approach and Its Shortcomings: A Case Study. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 15, 78–102.
Zabielskis, P. (2003). House, Self, and Society: The Cultural Space of Identity in a Multi-ethnic Southeast Asian City, Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, Department of Anthropology.
Zabielskis, P. (2008). Towards a Moral Ecology of the City: A New Form of Place-Based Identity and Social Action in Penang, Malaysia. Special issue on Place-Making and Liveability, edited by K. C. Ho and Mike Douglass. International Development Planning Review, 30(3), 267–291.
Zabielskis, P. (2012). The Environment with Chinese Characteristics: Implications for Policy, Governance, and Political Change. Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1), 99–111.
Zabielskis, P. (2013a). Faith and Property: Pressures of Development on Worship at the Mou Tai – Tin Hau 2013 Temple in Cheok Ka Chun, Taipa, Macau. In C. X. George Wei (Ed.), Macao: The Formation of a Global City. London/New York: Routledge.
Zabielskis, P. (2013b). Environmental Problems in China: Issues and Prospects. In Z. Hao & S. Chen (Eds.), Social Issues in China: Gender, Ethnicity, Labor, and the Environment. New York: Springer.
Zabielskis, P. (2017). At the Crossroads of History and Development: An Urban Kampung as ‘Unseen’ Heritage and a Critique of Development in Penang. In P. Zabielskis, Y. S. G. Peter, & K. Fatland (Eds.), Essays on Society and Culture in Penang. Penang: Areca Books.
Zhang, M., & Yang, Y. (2012). On Touristic Ecological Footprint of Macau. Chinese Journal of Population and Environment, 10(1), 80–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zabielskis, P. (2018). Challenges of Heritage Development Projects in Macau and Penang: Preservation and Anti-Preservation. In: Compton, Jr., R., Leung, H., Robles, Y. (eds) Dynamics of Community Formation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53359-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53359-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53358-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53359-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)