Advertisement

Challenges of Heritage Development Projects in Macau and Penang: Preservation and Anti-Preservation

  • Peter Zabielskis
Chapter
  • 295 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter critiques what easily happens when heritage preservation is considered primarily for the purpose of tourist development rather than the needs and values of local residents. The analytic proposed, in two Asian case studies (Macau SAR, China; and Penang, Malaysia) is that houses—so often the key focal point of both preservation projects and heritage narratives—all too often end up cleaned up and emptied out in what amounts to an inappropriately universal modernist emphasis on an objectified material design aesthetic that minimizes lived experiences and identities. Despite good intentions, such projects easily distance heritage away from local uses toward a more general and standardized type of globalized commercialization/commodification of history and culture despite recently widespread efforts to preserve more “intangible” aspects of heritage.

References

  1. Ahmad, Y. (2006). The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(3), 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, A. H. (Ed.). (2001). Culture of Metropolis in Macau: An International Symposium on Cultural Heritage Strategies for the Twenty-first Century. Macau: Instituto Cultural do Governo da R.A.E. de Macau.Google Scholar
  3. Chung, T. (2009). Valuing Heritage in Macau: On Contexts and Processes of Urban Conservation. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 38(1), 129–160.Google Scholar
  4. Clayton, C. H. (2009). Sovereignty at the Edge: Macau & the Question of Chineseness. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
  5. du Cros, H. (2009). Emerging Issues for Cultural Tourism in Macau. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 1, 73–99.Google Scholar
  6. Dewar, K., du Cros, H., & Li, W. (2012). The Search for World Heritage Brand Awareness Beyond the Iconic Heritage: A Case Study of the Historic Centre of Macao. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 7(4), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engelhardt, R. (2004). The Management of World Heritage Cities: Evolving Concepts, New Strategies. In D. Lung (Ed.), The Conservation of Urban Heritage: Macau Vision (pp. 33–48). Macao: Instituto Cultural do Governo da R.A.E. de Macau.Google Scholar
  8. Goh, B. L. (2001). Rethinking Urbanism in Malaysia: Power, Space and Identity. In M. Mohamad & S. K. Wong (Eds.), Risking Malaysia: Culture, Politics and Identity (pp. 159–178). Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
  9. Goh, B. L. (2002). Modern Dreams: An Inquiry into Power, Cultural Production, and the Cityscape in Contemporary Urban Penang, Malaysia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Graburn, N. H. H. (2006). Arts of the Fourth World. In H. Morphy & M. Perkins (Eds.), The Anthropology of Art: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Hewison, R. (1987). The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  12. Khoo, S. N. (1993). Streets of George Town. Penang: Areca Books.Google Scholar
  13. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1998). Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums and Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Klein, N. (2002). No Space, No Choice, No Jobs, No Logo. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  15. Loos, A.. (1998; [1930]). Ornament and Crime: Selected Essays. Riverside: Ariadne Press.Google Scholar
  16. Macau Daily Times. (2013, May 24). April: Visitor arrivals up by 0.7 percent year-on-year, p. 7.Google Scholar
  17. Morais, P. (2013). Macau’s Urban Identity Question 1557–1999/2009: Spatializing territory. In C. X. George Wei (Ed.), Macao: The Formation of a Global City. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Nagata, J. (2001). Heritage as a Site of Resistance: From Architecture to Political Activism in Urban Penang. In M. Mohamad & S. K. Wong (Eds.), Risking Malaysia: Culture, Politics and Identity. Bangi: Penebit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
  19. Nasution, K. S., & Jenkins, G. (2002). George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia: Development Strategies and Community Realities. In W. S. Logan (Ed.), The Disappearing ‘Asian’ City: Protecting Asia’s Urban Heritage in a Globalizing World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. de Pina-Cabral, J. (2002). Between China and Europe: Persons, Culture and Emotion in Macao. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. de Pina-Cabral, J. (2005). New Age Warriors: Negotiating the Handover on the Streets of Macao. Institute of Germanic & Romance Studies, 5(1), 9–22.Google Scholar
  22. du Plessis, J. (2005). The Growing Problem of Forced Evictions and the Crucial Importance of Community-Based, Locally Appropriate Alternatives. Environment & Urbanization, 17(1), 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robertson, I. J. M. (Ed.). (2012). Heritage from Below. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, L., & Akagawa, N. (Eds.). (2009). Intangible Heritage. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO Headquarters.Google Scholar
  27. UNESCO. (2011). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Thirty-fifth session. Paris: UNESCO Headquarters.Google Scholar
  28. UNESCO. (2017). Memory of the World Programme Objectives. http://unesco.org/new/en/communicationand information/memory-of-the-world/about-the-programme/objectives/. Accessed 30 Jan 2017.
  29. Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
  30. Vong, L. T.-N. (2013). An Investigation of the Influence of Heritage Tourism on Local People’s Sense of Place: The Macau Youth’s Experience. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 8(4), 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vong, L. T.-N. (2015). The Mediating Role of Place Identity in the Relationship Between Residents’ Perceptions of Heritage Tourism and Place Attachment: The Macau Youth Experience. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 10(4), 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wan, P. Y. K., & Pinheiro, F. V. (2014). Macau’s Tourism Planning Approach and Its Shortcomings: A Case Study. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 15, 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zabielskis, P. (2003). House, Self, and Society: The Cultural Space of Identity in a Multi-ethnic Southeast Asian City, Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, Department of Anthropology.Google Scholar
  34. Zabielskis, P. (2008). Towards a Moral Ecology of the City: A New Form of Place-Based Identity and Social Action in Penang, Malaysia. Special issue on Place-Making and Liveability, edited by K. C. Ho and Mike Douglass. International Development Planning Review, 30(3), 267–291.Google Scholar
  35. Zabielskis, P. (2012). The Environment with Chinese Characteristics: Implications for Policy, Governance, and Political Change. Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1), 99–111.Google Scholar
  36. Zabielskis, P. (2013a). Faith and Property: Pressures of Development on Worship at the Mou Tai – Tin Hau 2013 Temple in Cheok Ka Chun, Taipa, Macau. In C. X. George Wei (Ed.), Macao: The Formation of a Global City. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Zabielskis, P. (2013b). Environmental Problems in China: Issues and Prospects. In Z. Hao & S. Chen (Eds.), Social Issues in China: Gender, Ethnicity, Labor, and the Environment. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Zabielskis, P. (2017). At the Crossroads of History and Development: An Urban Kampung as ‘Unseen’ Heritage and a Critique of Development in Penang. In P. Zabielskis, Y. S. G. Peter, & K. Fatland (Eds.), Essays on Society and Culture in Penang. Penang: Areca Books.Google Scholar
  39. Zhang, M., & Yang, Y. (2012). On Touristic Ecological Footprint of Macau. Chinese Journal of Population and Environment, 10(1), 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Zabielskis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of MacauMacau SARChina

Personalised recommendations