Advertisement

Involved Fatherhood: Source of New Gender Conflicts?

  • Diana Lengersdorf
  • Michael Meuser
Chapter
Part of the Global Masculinities book series (GLMAS)

Abstract

During the past two decades the culture of fatherhood changed a lot, if not fundamentally in most countries of the global north. The figure of the male breadwinner, being one of the pillars of the traditional gender order, is no more taken for granted, but increasingly questioned (Cunningham, 2008; Meuser, 2010). A new cultural ideal of fatherhood developed: the “new” or the “involved” father—a father who participates in domestic work and childcare. Defining fatherhood only in terms of breadwinning for the family is more and more rejected as one-sided and seen as not matching the desires and needs of fathers as well as mothers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, S. M., and Hawkins, A. J. (1999). “Maternal Gatekeeping. Mothers’ Beliefs and Behaviors that Inhibit Greater Father Involvement in Family Work.” Journal ofMarriage and the Family, 61, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almqvist, A.-L. (2008). “Why Most Swedish Fathers and Few French Fathers Use Paid Parental Leave. An Explanatory Qualitative Study of Parents.” Fathering, 6, 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behnke, C., Lengersdorf, D., and Meuser, M. (2013). “Egalitatsanspriiche vs. Selbstverstandlichkeiten: Unterschiedliche Rahmungen vaterlichen Engagements bei Paaren aus den westlichen und den östlichen Bundesländern,” in A. Rusconi et al. (eds.), Paare und Ungleichheit(en). Eine Verhaltnisbestimmung. Opladen/Berlin/Toronto: Barbara Budrich, pp. 192–209.Google Scholar
  4. Behnke, C., and Meuser, M. (2012). “‘Look here mate! I’m taking parental leave for a year’—Involved Fatherhood and Images of Masculinity,” in M. Oechsle, U. Müller, and S. Hess (eds.), Fatherhood in Late Modernity. Cultural Images, Social Practices, Structural Frames. Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich, pp. 129–145.Google Scholar
  5. Bohnsack, R. (2010). “Documentary Method and Group Discussions,” in R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff, and W. Weller (eds.), Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research. Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich, pp. 99–124.Google Scholar
  6. Bohnsack, R. (2014). “Documentary Method,” in U. Flick (ed.), SAGE Handbook of Analyzing Qualitative Data. Thousand Oakes/London/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1990). “La domination masculine.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 84, 2–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt, B., and Kvande, E. (1998). “Masculinity and Child Care: The Reconstruction of Fathering.” The Sociological Review, 46, 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, J. (2013). “The Default Model: Gender Equality, Fatherhood, and Structural Constraint.” Politics & Gender, 9, 152–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkart, G. (2007). “Das modernisierte Patriarchat. Neue Väter und alte Probleme.” West End. Neue Zeitschriftfür Sozialforschung, 4, 82–91.Google Scholar
  11. Craig, L. (2006). “Does Father Care Means Fathers Share? A Comparison of How Mothers and Fathers in Intact Families Spend Time with Children.” Gender & Society, 20, 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham, M. (2008). “ChangingAttitudes toward the Male Breadwinner, Female Homemaker Family Model: Influences of Women’s Employment and Education over the Lifecourse.” Social Forces, 87, 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dermott, E. (2008). Intimate Fatherhood. A Sociological Analysis. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Doucet, A. (2006). Do Men Mother? Fathering, Care, and Domestic Responsibility. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gaunt, R. (2008). “Maternal Gatekeeping. Antecedents and Consequences.” Journal of Family Issues, 29, 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haas, L., and Hwang, C. P. (2008). “The Impact of Taking Parental Leave on Fathers’s Participation in Childcare and Relationships with Children. Lessons from Sweden.” Community, Work & Family, 11, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johansson, T. (2011). “The Construction of the New Father. How Middle Class Men Become Present Fathers.” International Review of Modern Sociology, 37, 111–126.Google Scholar
  18. Kaufmann, J.-C. (1997). La trame conjugale : analyse du couple par son Paris: Pocket)/German Edition (1997): Schmutzige Wäsche. Ein ungewöhnlicher Blick auf gewöhnliche Paarbeziehungen (Konstanz: UVK).Google Scholar
  19. LaRossa, R. (1988). “Fatherhood and Social Change.” Family Relations, 37, 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lupton, D., and Barclay, L. (1997). Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Magaraggia, S. (2013). “Tensions between Fatherhood and the Social Construction of Fatherhood in Italy.” Current Sociology, 61, 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maříková, H. (2008). “Caring Fathers and Gender’ Equality.” Polish Sociological Review, 162, 135–152.Google Scholar
  23. Merla, L. (2008). “Determinants, Costs, and Meanings of Belgian Stay-at-Home Fathers. An International Comparison.” Fathering, 6, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meuser, M. (2010). “Men and the Family—Perspectives from Men’s Studies,” in O. Kapella et al. (eds.), Family Diversity. Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich, pp. 118–125.Google Scholar
  25. Puhlmann, D. J., and Pasley, K. (2013). “Rethinking Maternal Gatekeeping.” Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scholz, S. (2004). Männlichkeiten erzählen. Lebensgeschichtliche Identit ätskonstruktionen ostdeutscher Männer. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  27. Segal, L. (1990). Slow Motion. Changing Masculinities, Changing Men. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Seidler, V. (2003). “Fathering, Masculinity and Parental Relationships,” in E. Søren and T. Johansson (eds.), Among Men. Moulding Masculinities. Aldershot/Burlington: Farnham, pp. 212–226.Google Scholar
  29. Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2009). “Veränderungen der Vaterschaft,” in O. Kapella, Ch. Rille-Pfeiffer, M. Rupp, and N. F. Schneider (eds.), Die Vielfalt der Familie. Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich, pp. 203–219.Google Scholar
  30. Senghaas-Knobloch, E. (2008). “Care-Arbeit und das Ethos fürsorglicher Praxis unter neuen Marktbedingungen am Beispiel der Pflegepraxis.” Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 18, 221–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Veroff, J., Sutherland, L., Chadiha, L., and Ortega, R. M. (1993). “Newlyweds Tell Their Stories: A Narrative Method for Assessing Marital Experiences.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wall, G., and Arnold, S. (2007). “How Involved Is Involved Fathering? An Exploration of the Contemporary Culture of Fatherhood.” Gender & Society, 21, 508–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Diana Lengersdorf and Michael Meuser 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Lengersdorf
  • Michael Meuser

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations