Abstract
In this chapter, the author presents a set of interrelated theoretical tools drawing on spatial, network, and mobilities theories that provide the post-foundational framework for analyzing how higher education institutions are now internationalized. The chapter demonstrates how the theoretical tools deployed draw on Foucauldian concepts, such as discourse, governmentality, and the productive, disciplinary nature of power/knowledge. Three theoretical frameworks are described. These include spatial theories that emphasize the need for complex understandings of the relationship between place/local and space/global. The author then describes network theories drawing on the work of Manuel Castells. Finally, key concepts associated with mobilities theories, including the idea of immobilities are outlined to show the reader the ways in social relations in internationalized higher education settings are produced through mobility.
Marianne A. LarsenWestern University London, Canada
Notes
- 1.
Time needs to be considered within this relational analysis as well, given that spatiality cannot be separated from temporality. Local–global spatial relations are co-constituted across space and time. As Massey (2005) explains, “space is not static (i.e. time-less), nor time space-less…spatiality and temporality are different from each other but neither can be conceptualized as the absence of the other” (p. 155).
References
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London/New York: Routledge.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: Human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.
Beech, S. E. (2015). International student mobility: The role of social networks. Social and Cultural Geography, 16(3), 332–350.
Beech, J., & Larsen, M. A. (2014). Replacing old spatial empires of the mind: Rethinking space and place through network spatiality. European Education, 46(1), 75–94.
Carney, S. (2008). Negotiating policy in an age of globalization: Exploring educational “policyscapes” in Denmark, Nepal, and China. Comparative Education Review, 53(1), 63–88.
Castells, M. (2000a). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.
Castells, M. (2000b). Grassrooting the space of flows. In J. O. Wheeler, Y. Aoyama, & B. Warf (Eds.), Cities in the telecommunications age: The fracturing of geographies (pp. 18–27). New York: Routledge.
Castells, M. (2004). The network society: A cross-cultural perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. London/New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1974). Prisons et asiles dans le mécanisme du pouvoir. In Dits et Ecrits, 11 (pp. 523–524), (trans: O’Farrell, C.). Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (trans: Sheridan, A.). New York: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1980). Questions of geography. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings. Hemel Hempsted: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. (1986). ‘Des Espace Autres’ (Of other spaces) (trans: Miskowiecd, J.). Diacritics. 16(1), 22–27.
Hannan, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1, 1–22.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of social change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics, and culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Jameson, F. J. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 59–92.
Kesselring, S. (2006). Pioneering mobilities: New patterns of movement and motility in a mobile world. Environment and Planning A, 38, 269–279.
Larsen, M. A., & Beech, J. (2014). Spatial theorizing in comparative and international education research. Comparative Education Review, 58(2), 191–214.
Larsen, J., Urry, J., & Axhausen, K. (2006). Mobilities, networks, geographies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Lefebvre, H. (1976). Reflections on the politics of space (trans: Enders, M.). Antipodes, 8, 30–37.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Wiley.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Oxford: Blackwell.
Massey, D. (2005). For space. Los Angeles: Sage.
Massey, D. (2009). The possibilities of a politics of place beyond place? A conversation with Doreen Massey. Scottish Geographical Journal, 125(3–4), 401–420.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19, 431–466.
Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its discontents: Essays on the new mobility of people and money. New York: The New Press.
Sassen, S. (2007a). A sociology of globalization. New York: Norton.
Sheller, M. (2011). Mobility. Sociopedia.isa. doi:10.1177/205684601163.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning, 28, 207–226.
Singh, M., Rizvi, F., & Shrestha, M. (2007). Student mobility and the spatial production of cosmopolitan identities. In K. N. Gulson & C. Symes (Eds.), Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matter (pp. 195–214). New York: Routledge.
Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self and culture. London: Routledge.
Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford: Blackwell.
Soja, E. W. (2009). Taking space personally. In B. Warf & S. Arias (Eds.), The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 11–34). London: Routledge.
Staeheli, L. A. (2003). Place. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography. Malden: Blackwell.
Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.
Waters, M. (1995). Globalisation. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larsen, M.A. (2016). Constructing a Theoretical Framework: Space, Networks, and Mobilities. In: Internationalization of Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53345-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53345-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53344-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53345-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)