Advertisement

On the Development of Sport and Masculinities Research: Feminism as a Discourse of Inspiration and Theoretical Legitimation

  • Richard Pringle
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter traces the historic and contemporary influence of feminist scholarship within research pertaining to the critical study of sport, masculinities and gender relations. The first section illustrates how feminist theorizing provides impetus for recognizing males as gendered beings, for understanding masculinity as a relational concept tied to the workings of power, and for highlighting the intimate connections between genders, bodies, sexualities and associated performances. The second section provides an overview of how particular theoretical perspectives (e.g., psychoanalytic approaches, sex-role theorizing, hegemonic masculinities, Bourdieuian and Foucauldian theorizing, and the concept of inclusive masculinities) have been drawn upon by sport and masculinity scholars and how feminist theorizing has worked to legitimate or problematize the use of these theories. The chapter concludes by suggesting that feminist ideals articulate with a sense of social justice and that this powerful articulation has, in part, acted to legitimate the prominence of feminism in the development of sport and masculinity scholarship.

References

  1. Allen, J. A. (2002). Men interminably in crisis? Historians on masculinity, sexual boundaries, and manhood. Radical History Review, 82, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. (2014). 21st century jocks: Sporting men and contemporary heterosexuality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, D. L. (1993). Desperately seeking Michel: Foucault’s genealogy, the body, and critical sport sociology. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10, 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, D. (2000). Posting up: French post-structuralism and the critical analysis of contemporary sporting cultures. In J. Coakley & E. Dunning (Eds.), Handbook of sports studies (pp. 106–137). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bem, S. (1974). Thje measurement of psychological androgeny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bridel, W., & Rail, G. (2007). Sport, sexuality, and the production of (resistant) bodies: De-/re-constructing the meanings of gay male marathon corporeality. Sociology of Sport Journal, 24(2), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brod, H. (1987). The making of masculinity: The new men’s studies. Boston: Allen.Google Scholar
  11. Brohm, J. M. (1981). Theses towards a political sociology of sport. In M. Hart & S. Birrell (Eds.), Sport in the sociocultural process. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Company.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, D. (2005). An economy of gendered practices? Learning to teach physical education from the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu’s embodied sociology. Sport, Education and Society, 10(1), 3–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryson, L. (1987). Sport and the maintenance of masculine hegemony. Women’s Studies International Forum, 10(4), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butler, J. (1985). Variations on sex and gender: Behaviour Wittig, and Foucault. Praxis International, 4, 505–516.Google Scholar
  15. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Carrigan, T., Connell, R., & Lee, J. (1985). Hard and heavy: Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory & Society, 14, 551–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P., Fontayne, P., Boiché, J., & Clément-Guillotin, C. (2013). The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(2), 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chandler, T. J. L. (1996). The structuring of manliness and the development of rugby football at the public schools and Oxbridge, 1830–1880. In J. Nauright & T. Chandler (Eds.), Making men: Rugby and masculine identity (pp. 13–31). London: Frank Cass & Co..Google Scholar
  19. Cole, C. L. (1993). Resisting the canon: Feminist cultural studies, sport, and technologies of the body. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 17(2), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Connell, R. W. (2002). Masculinities and globalisation. In H. Worth, A. Paris, & L. Allen (Eds.), The life of Brian: Masculinities, sexualities and health in New Zealand (pp. 27–42). Dunedin, NZ: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
  23. De Beauvoir, S. (1949/1997). The second sex. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Diamond, I., & Quinby, L. (Eds.). (1988). Feminism and Foucault: Reflections of resistance. Boston: North Easton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory & Society, 22(5), 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duncan, M. C. (1994). The politics of women’s body images and practices: Foucault, the panopticon, and shape magazine. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 18(1), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunning, E., & Sheard, K. (1979). Barbarians, gentlemen and players: A sociological study of the development of rugby football. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  28. Edley, N., & Wetherell, M. (1995). Men in perspective: Practice, power and identity. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  29. Farrell, W. T. (1974). The liberated man: Freeing men and their relationships with women. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  30. Flood, M. (2002). Between men and masculinity: An assessment of the ‘term’ masculinity in recent scholarship on men. In S. Pearce & V. Muller (Eds.), Manning the next millennium: Studies in masculinities (pp. 203–213). Perth: Black Swan.Google Scholar
  31. Gilkinson, H. (1937). Masculine temperament and secondary sex characteristics: A study of the relationship between psychological and physical measures of masculinity. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 19, 105–154.Google Scholar
  32. Goodger, J. (1982). Theories of change in sport: Comments on some recent contributions. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 17(3), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gorely, T., Holroyd, R., & Kirk, D. (2003). Muscularity, the habitus and the social construction of gender: Towards a gender-relevant physical education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(4), 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greendorfer, S. (1978). Socialization into sport. In C. Oglesby (Ed.), Women and sport: From myth to reality (pp. 115–140). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  35. Gruneau, R. (1983). Class, sports, and social development. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gruneau, R. S. (1991). Sport and ‘esprit de corps’: Notes on power, culture and the politics of the body. In F. Landry, M. Landry, & M. Yerles (Eds.), Sport…The third millennium (pp. 169–185). Les Sainte-Foy: Presses de L’Universite Laval.Google Scholar
  37. Hall, M. A. (1996). Feminism and sporting bodies: Essays on theory and practice. Champiagn, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Hargreaves, J. (Ed.). (1982). Sport, culture and ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  39. Hargreaves, J. (1986). Sport, power and culture: A social and historical analysis of popular sports in Britain. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hargreaves, J., & Anderson, E. (2014). Routledge handbook of sport, gender and sexuality. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Harrison, L. A., & Lynch, A. B. (2005). Social role theory and the perceived gender role orientation of athletes. Sex Roles, 52(3–4), 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harvey, J. (1983). Le corps programme’ ou la rhitorique de Kino-Qukbec [The programmed body or the rhetoric of Kino-Quebec]. Montreal: Albert Saint-Martin.Google Scholar
  43. Henderson, K. A. (1990). The meaning of leisure for women: An integrative review of the research. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(3), 228–243.Google Scholar
  44. Henderson, K. A. (1994). Perspectives on analysing gender, women and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 119–137.Google Scholar
  45. Henderson, K., Hodges, S., & Kivel, B. (2002). Context and dialogue in research on women and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(3), 253–271.Google Scholar
  46. Hokowhitu, B. (2004). Tackling Maori masculinity: A colonial genealogy of savagery and sport. The Contemporary Pacific, 16(2), 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. hunter, l. (2004). Bourdieu and the social space of the PE class: Reproduction of Doxa through practice. Sport, Education and Society, 9(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kay, J., & Laberge, S. (2004). ‘Mandatory equipment’: Women in adventure racing. In B. Wheaton (Ed.), Understanding lifestyle sports: Consumption, identity and difference (pp. 154–174). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Kidd, B. (1990). The men’s cultural centre: Sports and the dynamic of women’s oppression/men’s repression. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 31–43). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  50. Laberge, S. (1995). Toward an integration of gender into Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Light, R., & Kirk, D. (2000). High school rugby, the body and the reproduction of hegemonic masculinity. Sport, Education and Society, 5(2), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Markula, P. (1995). Firm but shapely, fit but sexy, strong but thin: The postmodern aerobicizing female bodies. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McKay, J., Messner, M., & Sabo, D. (2000). Studying sport, men, and masculinities from feminist standpoints. In J. McKay, M. Messner, & D. Sabo (Eds.), Masculinities, gender relations, and sport (pp. 1–11). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Messner, M. A. (1988). Sports and male domination: The female athlete as contested ideological terrain. Sociology of Sport Journal, 5, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Messner, M. A. (1990). Boyhood, organised sports, and the construction of masculinities. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(4), 416–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Messner, M., & Sabo, D. (Eds.). (1990). Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  57. Miller, T. (1998). Commodifying the male body, problematizing ‘hegemonic masculinity?’. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 22(4), 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller, T. (2010). Alan Ingham Memorial Address. In North American Sociology of Sport 31st Annual Conference, Producing knowledge, producing bodies. San Diego, USA, November 3–6.Google Scholar
  59. Morford, W. R., & McIntosh, M. J. (1993). Sport and Victorian gentleman. In A. Ingham & J. Loy (Eds.), Sport in social development: Traditions, transitions and transformations (pp. 51–76). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  60. Ogburn, W. F. (1937). Culture and sociology. Social Forces, 16, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pleck, J. H., & Sawyer, J. (Eds.). (1974). Men and masculinity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  63. Polsky, N. (1967). Poolrooms: End of the male sanctuary. Society, 4(4), 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pringle, R. (2005). Masculinities, power and sport: A critical comparison of Foucauldian and Gramscian inspired theoretical tool. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29(3), 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pringle, R. (2014). Bourdieu comes off the bench: A reflexive analysis of the circulation of ideas within the sociology of sport field. In L. Hunter, W. Smith, & E. Emerald (Eds.), Fields of physical culture: Encounters with and beyond Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 168–176). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Pronger, B. (1990). The arena of masculinity: Sports, homosexuality, and the meaning of sex. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  67. Rowe, D. (1998). Play up: Rethinking power and resistance. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 22(3), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Sedgwick, E. (1990). Epistemologies of the closet. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 45–61). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Segal, L. (1990). Slow motion: Changing masculinities, changing men. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sheard, K., & Dunning, E. (1973). The rugby football club as a type of male preserve: Some sociological notes. International Review of Sport Sociology, 5(3), 5–24.Google Scholar
  72. Star, L. (1999). New masculinities theory: Poststructuralism and beyond. In R. Law, H. Campbell, & J. Dolan (Eds.), Masculinities in Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 36–45). Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tetreault, M. K. (1985). Feminist phase theory: An experience-derived evaluation model. Journal of Higher Education, 56(4), 363–384.Google Scholar
  74. Theberge, N. (1981). A critique of critiques: Radical and feminist writings on sport. Social Forces, 60, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Theberge, N. (1991). Reflections on the body in the sociology of sport. Quest, 43, 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wedgwood, N. (2009). Connell’s theory of masculinity – Its origins and influences on the study of gender. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. White, P. G., & Vagi, A. B. (1990). Rugby in the 19th-century British boarding-school system: A feminist psychoanalytic perspective. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 67–78). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  78. Whitson, D. (1990). Sport in the social construction of masculinity. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 19–29). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  79. Willis, P. (1982). Women in sport and ideology. In J. Hargreaves (Ed.), Sport, culture and ideology (pp. 117–135). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Pringle
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations