Advertisement

Post-colonial Feminist International Relations Theory and Sport for Development and Peace

  • Lyndsay M. C. Hayhurst
  • Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom
  • Devra Waldman
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we suggest that bridging post-colonial feminist perspectives and international relations (IR) standpoints can make important contributions to thinking about operations of power and knowledge in sport for development and peace (SDP) scholarship. Contending that post-colonial feminist IR standpoints provide avenues to consider issues of global capitalism, class, and politics of knowledge and representation, we apply these themes to an analysis of an SDP initiative run by Standard Chartered Bank that focuses on transforming the lives of young women in underserved communities. We conclude by highlighting the value of a post-colonial feminist IR approach in exposing some of the racialized, classed and gendered silences/invisibilities in SDP, and suggesting that future research explore instances of grassroots resistance, agency and localized counter-narratives to “global” SDP interventions.

References

  1. Ackerly, B., & True, J. (2008). Reflexivity in practice: Power and ethics in feminist research on international relations. International Studies Review, 10(4), 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Neorealism and neoliberalism: The contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Batliwala, S., & Dhanraj, D. (2007). Gender myths that instrumentalize women: A view from the Indian frontline. In A. Cornwall, E. Harrison, & A. Whitehead (Eds.), Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations and challenges (pp. 21–34). New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Black, D. (2008). Dreaming big: The pursuit of “second order” games as a strategic response to globalization. Sport in Society, 11(4), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chant, S. (2012). The disappearing of ‘smart economics’? The world development report 2012 on gender equality: Some concerns about the preparatory process and the prospects for paradigm change. Global Social Policy, 12(2), 198–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chawansky, M. (2012). Good girls play sports: International inspiration and the construction of girlhood. Feminist Media Studies, 12(3), 473–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chowdhry, G., & Nair, S. (2002). Power, postcolonialism, and international relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Darnell, S. C. (2012). Sport for development and peace: A critical sociology. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Darnell, S. C., & Hayhurst, L. M. C. (2011). Sport for decolonization: Exploring a new praxis of sport for development. Progress in Development Studies, 11(3), 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darnell, S. C., & Hayhurst, L. M. C. (2014). De-colonising sport-for-development: Critical insights from post-colonial feminist theory. In N. Schulenkorg & D. Adair (Eds.), Global sport-for-development: Critical perspectives (pp. 33–61). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Darnell, S. C., & Huish, R. (2015a). Cuban sport and the challenges of South-South solidarity. In L. M. C. Hayhurst, T. Kay, & M. Chawansky (Eds.), Beyond sport for development and peace: Transnational perspectives on theory, policy and practice (pp. 35–46). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Darnell, S. C., & Huish, R. (2015b). Cuban sport policy and South-South development cooperation: An overview and analysis of the Escuela Internacional de Educación Física y Deporte. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7(1), 123–140.Google Scholar
  17. Doyle, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and world politics. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1151–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forde, S., Waldman, D., Hayhurst, L. M. C., & Frisby, W. (2017). Sport, social change and peace. In D. Andrews, M. Silk, & H. Thorpe (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of physical cultural studies (pp. 568–579). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Giulianotti, R. (2011). Sport, transnational peacemaking, and global civil society: Exploring the reflective discourses of “Sport, Development and Peace” project officials. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 35(1), 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goal. (2015). Goal programme. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from http://goalprogramme.org
  23. Harvey, J., Horne, J., Safai, P., Darnell, S. C., & Courchesne-O’Neill, S. (2013). Sport and social movements: From the global to the local. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hayhurst, L. M. C. (2011a). Corporatising sport, gender and development: Postcolonial IR feminisms, transnational private governance and global corporate social engagement. Third World Quarterly, 32(3), 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayhurst, L. M. C. (2011b). The corporatization of sport, gender and development: Postcolonial IR feminisms, transnational private governance and global corporate social engagement, Munk School of Global Affairs Working Paper Series 2009–2010. Retrieved September 12, 2012, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1942740
  26. Hayhurst, L. M. C. (2014). Using postcolonial feminism to investigate cultural difference and neoliberalism in sport, gender and development programming in Uganda. In K. Young & C. Okada (Eds.), Sport, social development and peace (pp. 45–65). New York: Emerald Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayhurst, L. M. C., MacNeill, M., & Frisby, W. (2011). A postcolonial feminist approach to gender, development and Edusport. In B. Houlihan & M. Green (Eds.), Handbook of sport development (pp. 353–367). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Houlihan, B. (1994). Sport and international politics. London: Harvester and Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  29. Houlihan, B. (1997). Sport, policy and politics: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Houlihan, B., & White, A. (2002). The politics of sports development: Development of sport or development through sport? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huish, R., Carter, T., & Darnell, S. (2013). The (soft) power of sport: The comprehensive and contradictory strategies of Cuba’s sport-based internationalism. International Journal of Cuban Studies, 5(1), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Idle No More. (2014). Retrieved July 2, 2015, from http://www.idlenomore.ca/
  33. Jeanes, R. (2013). Educating through sport? Examining HIV/AIDS education and sport-for-development through the perspectives of Zambian young people. Sport Education and Society, 18(3), 388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kant, I., Kleingeld, P., Waldron, J., Doyle, M. W., & Wood, A. W. (2006). Toward perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace, and history. Hartford: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  38. Levermore, R. (2004). Sport and international relations: Continued neglect? In R. Levermore & A. Budd (Eds.), Sport and international relations: An emerging relationship (pp. 16–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Levermore, R. (2009). Sport-in-international development: Theoretical frameworks. In R. Levermore & A. Beacom (Eds.), Sport and international development (pp. 26–54). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levermore, R., & Beacom, A. (Eds.). (2009). Sport and international development. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  41. Levermore, R., & Beacom, A. (2014). Sport and international relations re-examined. In J. Maguire (Ed.), Handbook of the social sciences and sport (pp. 219–245). Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  42. Levermore, R., & Budd, A. (Eds.). (2004). Sport and international relations: An emerging relationship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Lindsey, I., & Grattan, A. (2012). An ‘international movement’? Decentering sport-for-development within Zambian communities. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4(1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ling, L. H. M. (2002). Cultural chauvinism and the liberal international order: “West vs. rest” in Asia’s financial crisis. In G. Chowdhry & S. Nair (Eds.), Power in a postcolonial world: Race, gender and class in international relations (pp. 115–114). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Ling, L. H. M. (2013). Session 3 – International relations theory: Views from beyond the west. Retrieved August 24, 2015, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tLMtAYiCSg
  46. Ling, L. H. M. (2014). Decolonizing the international: Towards multiple emoition worlds. International Theory, 6(3), 579–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Locher, B., & Prugl, E. (2001). Feminism and constructivism: Worlds apart or sharing the middle ground? International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Locke, J., & Macpherson, C. B. (1980). Second treatise of government. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  49. Maguire, J. (2008). “Real politic” or “ethically based”: Sport, globalisation, migration and nation-state policies. Sport in Society, 11(4), 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milner, H. (1991). The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: A critique. Review of International Studies, 17(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morgenthau, H. J. (1954). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  52. Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenau, J. N. (1999). Toward an ontology of global governance. In M. Hewson & T. J. Sinclair (Eds.), Approaches to global governance theory (pp. 287–302). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schulenkorf, N. (2012). Sustainable community development through sport and events: A conceptual framework for sport-for-development projects. Sport Management Review, 15(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Standard Chartered. (2009). Sustainability review 2009: Goal. Retrieved September 15, 2015, from http://www.standardchartered.com/sustainability-review-09/en/community_investment/goal.html
  56. Standard Chartered. (2011). Sustainability review 2011: Goal. Retrieved July 15, 2015, from http://reports.standardchartered.com/sr2011/leadingthewayincommunities/communityinvestment/goalprogramme.html?cat=m
  57. Standard Chartered. (2014). Sustainability summary 2014: Driving investment, trade and the creation of wealth across Asia, Africa and the Middle East. London: Standard Chartered.Google Scholar
  58. Sylvester, C. (1994a). Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Sylvester, C. (1994b). Empathetic cooperation: A feminist method for IR. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 23(2), 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tickner, J. A. (1988). Hans Morgenthau’s principles of political realism: A feminist reformulation. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tickner, J. A. (1992). Gender in international relations: Feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  62. True, J. (1999). Expanding markets and marketing gender: The integration of the postsocialist Czech Republic. Review of International Political Economy, 6(3), 360–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tuathail, G. Ó., & Agnew, J. (1992). Geopolitics and discourse: Practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography, 11(2), 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walt, S. M. (1998). International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, 110, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  66. Weldes, J. (2006). High politics and low data: Globalization discourse and popular culture. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 176–186). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, B. (2012). Sport and peace: A sociological perspective. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lyndsay M. C. Hayhurst
    • 1
  • Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom
    • 2
  • Devra Waldman
    • 2
  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations