Advertisement

Norbert Elias, Figurational Sociology and Feminisms

  • Katie Liston
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the main contributions of the figurational sociological tradition to the study of sport and gender. It charts the development of figurational work on sport and gender since the publication of the pioneering text Quest for Excitement. Elias’ own elaborations on relations between the sexes are also reviewed. Building on this groundwork, the chapter offers an overview of some of the exchanges between feminists and “figurati”. Central in this connection are varied interpretations of the concept of involvement/detachment, critiques of the notion of scientific objectivity and varying approaches to the role of values in research. The chapter concludes with an Eliasian focus on more egalitarian forms of sex relations and the implications of this for future work on sport and gender.

References

  1. Bairner, A. (2008). The Leicester school and the study of football hooliganism. In D. Malcolm & I. Waddington (Eds.), Matters of sport: Essays in honour of Eric Dunning (pp. 81–96). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Birrell, S. (2000). Feminist theories for sport. In J. Coakley & E. Dunning (Eds.), Handbook of sports studies (pp. 61–76). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bloyce, D., & Lovett, E. (2012). Planning for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic legacy: A figurational analysis. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics., 4(3), 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloyce, D., & Smith, A. (2010). Sport policy and development: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. du Bois, B. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social science. In G. Bowles & R. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 105–116). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Coakley, J., & Pike, E. (2009). Sports in society: Issues and controversies. London: Open University/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Colwell, S. (1999). Feminisms and figurational sociology: Contributions to understandings of sport, physical education and sex/gender. European Physical Education Review., 5(3), 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunning, E. (1999). Sport matters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dunning, E., & Hughes, J. (2013). Norbert Elias and modern sociology: Knowledge, interdependence, power, process. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  10. Dunning, E., & Maguire, J. (1996). Process-sociological notes on sport, gender relations and violence control. International Review for the Sociology of Sport., 31(3), 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunning, E., Malcolm, D., & Waddington, I. (2004). Conclusion: Figurational sociology and the development of modern sport. In E. Dunning, D. Malcolm, & I. Waddington (Eds.), Sport histories: Figurational studies of the development of modern sports (pp. 191–206). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Dunning, E., & Sheard, K. (1973). The rugby football club as a type of male preserve: Some sociological notes. International Review of Sport Sociology., 8, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elias, N. (2007 [1987]). Involvement and detachment (Collected Works, Vol. 8). Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  14. Elias, N. (2009a). The changing balance of power between the sexes: A process sociological study: The example of the ancient Roman state. In Essays III: On sociology and the humanities (Collected Works, Vol. 16, pp. 240–266). Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elias, N. (2009b). Foreword to women torn two ways. In Essays III: On sociology and the humanities (Collected Works, Vol. 16, pp. 270–276). Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  16. Elias, N. (2009c). Where two come together in lawful matrimony. In Essays III: On sociology and the humanities (Collected Works, Vol. 16, pp. 266–270). Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  17. Elias, N. (2014). Freud’s concept of society and beyond it. In Supplements and index (Collected Works, Vol. 18, pp. 13–53). Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (2008 [1986]). Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilizing process (Collected Works, Vol. 7). Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  19. Figurations. (2004). Newsletter of the Norbert Elias Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.norberteliasfoundation.nl/figurations.php
  20. Fry, J., & Bloyce, D. (2015). Friends as enemies: A sociological analysis of the relationship among touring professional golfers, International Review for the Sociology of Sport. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690215597659
  21. Giulianotti, R. (2004). Sport and modern social theorists. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gornicka, B., Liston, K., & Mennell, S. (2015). Twenty-five years on: Norbert Elias’s intellectual legacy 1990–2015. Human Figurations. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0004.303
  23. Goudsblom, J. (1977). Sociology in the balance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Hargreaves, J. (1992). Sex, gender and the body in sport and leisure: Has there been a civilizing process? In E. Dunning & C. Rojek (Eds.), Sport and leisure in the civilizing process (pp. 161–183). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hargreaves, J. (1996). Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sports. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Ketler, D., Loader, C., & Meja, V. (2008). Karl Mannheim and the legacy of Max Weber. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Killick, L. (2009). ‘Walking the fine line?’: Young people, sporting risk, health and embodied identities. PhD thesis, Loughborough University Institutional Repository.Google Scholar
  28. Kilminster, R. (1991). Editor’s introduction. In N. Elias (Ed.), The symbol theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Kilminster, R. (2004). From distance to detachment: Knowledge and self-knowledge in Elias’s theory of involvement and detachment. In S. Loyal & S. Quilley (Eds.), The sociology of Norbert Elias (pp. 25–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. van Krieken, R. (1998). Norbert Elias. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Lake, R. (2009). Real tennis and the civilizing process. Sport in History, 29(4), 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langer, C. (2001). What’s right with feminism: How feminism has changed American society, culture and how we live from the 1940’s to the present. New York: ASJA Press.Google Scholar
  33. Liston, K. (2005). Established–outsider relations between males and females in sports in Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology, 14(1), 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liston, K. (2007). Revisiting the feminist-figurational sociology exchange. Sport in Society, 10(4), 623–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liston, K. (2008). The problem of ideology in making sense of physical education and sport: Reflections on the Colwell-Mansfield debate. European Physical Education Review, 14(1), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liston, K. (2014). Revisiting relations between the sexes in sport on the island of Ireland. In T. Landini & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Norbert Elias and empirical research (pp. 197–218). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Loyal, S., & Quilley, S. (Eds.). (2004). The sociology of Norbert Elias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Malcolm, D. (2004). Cricket: Civilizing and de-civilizing processes in the imperial game. In E. Dunning, D. Malcolm, & I. Waddington (Eds.), Sport histories: Figurational studies of the development of modern sport (pp. 71–87). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Mansfield, L. (2007). Involved-detachment: A balance of passion and reason in feminisms and gender-related research on sport, tourism and sports tourism. Journal of Sport and Tourism., 12(2), 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mansfield, L. (2008). Reconsidering the relationships between feminisms and the work of Norbert Elias for understanding gender, sport and sport-related activities. European Physical Education Review, 14(1), 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maynard, M. (1994). Methods, practice and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research. In M. Maynard & J. Purvis (Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 10–26). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  42. Mennell, S. (1998). Norbert Elias: An introduction. Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mennell, S. (2014). Apropos “the collected works of Norbert Elias”. Sociologica, 3, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2383/79482. Retrieved from http://www.ucdpress.ie/PDFs/Stephen%20Mennell%20Elias%20Interview%2026-05-15.pdf Google Scholar
  44. Rojek, C. (2008). Sports celebrity and the civilizing process. In D. Malcolm & I. Waddington (Eds.), Matters of sport: Essays in honour of Eric Dunning (pp. 172–188). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Scraton, S., & Flintoff, A. (Eds.). (2002). Gender and sport: A reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Tomlinson, A. (Ed.). (2006). The sports studies reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Velija, P. (2011). Nice girls don’t play cricket: The theory of established and outsider relations and perceptions of sexuality and class amongst female cricketers. Sport in Society., 14(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Velija, P., & Flynn, L. (2010). Their bottoms are the wrong shape: Female jockeys and the theory of established outsider relations. Sociology of Sport Journal., 27, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie Liston
    • 1
  1. 1.Ulster UniversityNewtownabbeyIreland

Personalised recommendations