Blogging and Feminist Participatory Research Online

  • Andrea Bundon


Undertaking participatory action research (PAR) means making a commitment to doing work that exposes how power operates in research and that seeks to redistribute power more equitably by providing participants with meaningful roles in the research process. In this chapter, I discuss how feminist scholars can use and are using blogs to advance understandings of gender in sport, leisure and physical education. I then explore how, in the blogosphere, individuals who have been excluded from other forms of political engagement may start to see themselves as political agents and cultural producers, and the role of feminist participatory research methods in supporting this process. The chapter concludes with a review of existing examples of feminist sport scholars who are using online tools and online spaces to transform their research practices and do research that is more collaborative and inclusive of diverse communities.


  1. Antunovic, D., & Hardin, M. (2013). Women bloggers: Identity and the conceptualization of sports. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1374–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antunovic, D., & Hardin, M. (2015). Women and the blogosphere: Exploring feminist approaches to sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(6), 661–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumer, E., Sueyoshi, M., & Tomlinson, B. (2011). Bloggers and readers blogging together: Collaborative co-creation of political blogs. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 20(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baym, N. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, E., & Gough, B. (2013). In pursuit of leanness: The management of appearance, affect and masculinities within a men’s weight loss forum. Health, 17(3), 284–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein, A. (2002). Is it time for a victory lap? Changes in the media coverage of women in sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37(3–4), 415–428.Google Scholar
  7. boyd, d. (2009). The not-so-hidden politics of class online. Personal Democracy Forum, 30 June. Retrieved 9 October 2015, from
  8. boyd, d. (2011). Social networks sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bruce, T. (2013). Reflections on communication and sport on women and femininities. Communication and Sport, 1(1–2), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bundon, A., & Hurd Clarke, L. (2015a). Honey or vinegar? Athletes with disabilities discuss strategies for advocacy within the Paralympic movement. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 39(5), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bundon, A., & Hurd Clarke, L. (2015b). Unless you go online you’re on your own: Blogging as a bridge in para-sport. Disability and Society, 30(2), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cargo, M., & Mercer, S. L. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 325–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chayko, M. (2007). The portable community: Envisioning and examining mobile social connectedness. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 3(4), 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clavio, G., & Eagleman, A. N. (2011). Gender and sexually suggestive images in sports blogs. Journal of Sport Management, 25(4), 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conner, N. (2014). Global cultural flows and the routes of identity: The imagined worlds of Celtic FC. Social and Cultural Geography, 15(5), 525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooky, C., Messner, M. A., & Hextrum, R. H. (2013). Women play sport, but not on TV a longitudinal study of televised news media. Communication and Sport, 1(3), 203–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dart, J. J. (2009). Blogging the 2006 FIFA World Cup finals. Sociology of Sport Journal, 26(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory: Feedback and capture in the circuits of drive. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellis, E., & Kent, M. (2011). Disability and new media. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, M., Hole, R., Berg, L. D., Hutchinson, P., & Sookraj, D. (2009). Common insights, differing methodologies: Toward a fusion of indigenous methodologies, participatory action research, and white studies in an urban Aboriginal research agenda. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frisby, F., Crawford, S., & Dorer, T. (1997). Reflections on participatory action research: The case of low-income women accessing local physical activity services. Journal of Sport Management, 11(1), 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gustafson, D. L., & Brunger, F. (2014). Ethics, “vulnerability,” and feminist participatory action research with a disability community. Qualitative Health Research, 24(7), 997–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hambrick, M. F., Frederick, E. L., & Sanderson, J. (2013). From yellow to blue: Exploring Lance Armstrong’s image repair strategy across traditional and social media. Communication & Sport, 3(2), 196–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardin, M., & Whiteside, E. (2012). How do women talk sports? Women sports fans in a blog community. In K. Toffoletti & P. Mewett (Eds.), Sport and its female fans (pp. 152–168). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Hardin, M., Zhong, B., & Corrigan, T. F. (2012). The funhouse mirror: The blogosphere’s reflection of women’s sports. In T. Dumova & R. Fiordo (Eds.), Blogging in the global society: Cultural, political and geographical aspects (pp. 51–77). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  28. Hayhurst, L. M., Giles, A. R., & Radforth, W. M. (2015). “I want to come here to prove them wrong”: Using a post-colonial feminist participatory action research (PFPAR) approach to studying sport, gender and development programmes for urban Indigenous young women. Sport in Society, 18(1), 952–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heinecken, D. (2015). So tight in the thighs, so loose in the waist” Embodying the female athlete online. Feminist Media Studies [Online first].
  30. Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing trolling in a feminist forum. The Information Society, 18(5), 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Holt, N. L., McHugh, T. L. F., Tink, L. N., Kingsley, B. C., Coppola, A. M., Neely, K. C., et al. (2013). Developing sport-based after-school programmes using a participatory action research approach. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 5(3), 332–355.Google Scholar
  34. Hutchins, B., & Mikosza, J. (2010). The Web 2.0 Olympics: Athlete blogging, social networking and policy contradictions at the 2008 Beijing Games. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(3), 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnston, A., Friedman, B., & Peach, S. (2011). Standpoint in political blogs: Voice, authority, and issues. Women’s Studies, 40(3), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kane, M. J. (2013). The better sportswomen get, the more the media ignore them. Communication & Sport, 1(3), 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keller, J. M. (2012). Virtual feminisms: Girl’s blogging communities, feminist activism, and participatory politics. Information, Communication and Society, 15(3), 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kitchin, R. (2000). The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research. Disability & Society, 15(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lebel, K., & Danylchuk, K. (2012). How tweet it is: A gendered analysis of professional tennis players’ self-presentation on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(4), 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lisec, J., & McDonald, M. G. (2012). Gender inequality in the new millennium: An analysis of WNBA representations in sport blogs. Journal of Sports Media, 7(2), 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lopez, L. K. (2009). The radical act of mommy blogging: Redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media and Society, 11(5), 729–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mackay, S., & Dallaire, C. (2013). Skirtboarder net-a-narratives: Young women creating their own skateboarding (re)presentations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48(2), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mackay, S., & Dallaire, C. (2014). Skateboarding women: Building collective identity in cyberspace. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 38(6), 548–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the Internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Messner, M. A., Duncan, M. C., & Cooky, C. (2003). Silence, sport bras, and wrestling porn: Women in televised sports news and highlights shows. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 27(1), 38–51.Google Scholar
  46. Millington, R., & Darnell, S. C. (2014). Constructing and contesting the Olympics online: The Internet, Rio 2016 and the politics of Brazilian development. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 49(2), 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicholls, S., Giles, A. R., & Sethna, C. (2011). Perpetuating the lack of evidence discourse in sport for development: Privileged voices, unheard stories and subjugated knowledge. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norman, M. (2014). Online community or electronic tribe? Exploring the social characteristics and spatial production of an Internet hockey fan culture. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 38(5), 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Numerato, D. (2015). Behind the digital curtain: Ethnography, football fan activism and social change. Qualitative Research [Online first].
  50. Olesen, V. (2011). Feminist qualitative research in the millennium’s first decade. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 129–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Olive, R. (2013). Making friends with the neighbours’: Blogging as a research method. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pavlidis, A., & Fullagar, S. (2013). Becoming roller derby grrrls: Exploring the gendered play of affect in mediated sport cultures. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48(6), 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Plymire, D. C., & Forman, P. J. (2000). Breaking the silence: Lesbian fans, the Internet, and the sexual politics of women’s sport. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 5(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ponic, P., Reid, C., & Frisby, W. (2010). Cultivating the power of partnerships in feminist participatory action research in women’s health. Nursing Inquiry, 17(4), 324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reid, C., & Brief, E. (2009). Confronting condescending ethics: How community-based research challenges traditional approaches to consent, confidentiality, and capacity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(1), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reid, C., Ponic, P., Hara, L., Ledrew, R., Kaweesi, C., & Besla, K. (2011). Living an ethical agreement: Negotiating confidentiality and harm in feminist participatory action research. In G. Creese & W. Frisby (Eds.), Feminist community research: Case studies and methodology (pp. 189–209). Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rettberg, J. W. (2008). Blogging. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  59. Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Ruddock, A., Hutchins, B., & Rowe, D. (2010). Contradictions in media sport culture: The reinscription of football supporter traditions through online media. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(3), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sanderson, J. (2012). Stepping into the (social media) game: Building athlete identity via Twitter. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Handbook of research on technoself: Identity in a technological society (pp. 419–438). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, W. R. (2015). Communication, sportsmanship, and negotiating ethical conduct on the digital playing field. Communication & Sport [Online first].
  63. Stoudt, B. G., Fox, M., & Fine, M. (2012). Contesting privilege with critical participatory action research. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stragier, J., Evens, T., & Mechant, P. (2015). Broadcast yourself: An exploratory study of sharing physical activity on social networking sites. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 155, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stragier, J., Mechant, P., & De Marez, L. (2013). Studying physical activity using social media: An analysis of the added value of RunKeeper tweets. International Journal of Interactive Communication Systems and Technologies, 3(2), 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waters, R. D., Burke, K. A., Jackson, Z. J., & Buning, J. D. (2011). Using stewardship to cultivate fandom online: Comparing how National Football League teams use their web sites and Facebook to engage their fans. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Bundon
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations